Jump to content

User talk:Wiki7Hell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2024

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hi Wiki7Hell! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Twink (gay slang) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Twink (gay slang), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Ïvana (talk) 04:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 16:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Twenteen

[edit]

Hello, Wiki7Hell

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ibjaja055, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Twenteen, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Twenteen

[edit]

Hello Wiki7Hell, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Twenteen, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenteen.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ibjaja055: I would like to know, if my page "Twenteen" that is up for deletion is not voted on during those 7 days as you mentioned, will it remain available as a normal page or will it still be deleted automatically?
Wiki7Hell (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ibjaja055: If my "twenteen" page is not deleted I will improve it further and continue working on it to make it accurate, consistent and improved over time.
Wiki7Hell (talk) 04:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The deletion discussion concluded yesterday, the article has already been deleted. MrOllie (talk) 16:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Recreating the same thing at another title is disruptive. You should respect the community decision on this. MrOllie (talk) 22:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twenteen Years (October 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Twenteen instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wiki7Hell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOS

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. In particular, please read WP:MOS, which describes how we format section headings.

Additionally, while you've included sources much of the material you are adding violates WP:SYNTH. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring MOS:HEAD, WP:SYNTH

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OhNoitsJamie: My article is largely based on reliable sources and in context. So please stop deleting my articles unnecessarily. And at least read the links in the article before just deleting. Thanks for understanding.Wiki7Hell (talk) 17:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have 36 hours to read MOS:HEAD and WP:SYNTH. If you resume making disruptive edits when this block expires, the next block will be longer. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twenteen years

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Twenteen years requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenteen. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrOllie (talk) 22:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wiki7Hell! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Wiki7Hell! Your additions to Adolescence have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Diannaa (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You again tried to rewrite the article lead and inserted copyright violating text. [1] You've got to stop doing this. MrOllie (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MrOllie
Did you at least read my edit and review the articles mentioned? It seems not, I used my own words to edit the file according to verified sources, and I also followed all possible Wikipedia rules. You are a disgrace to Wikipedia and to all other users and should not be an administrator since that role is not yours. I hope you are banned indefinitely from Wikipedia. Wiki7Hell (talk) 20:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did review the articles, yes. That is how I noticed you were violating copyright. You absolutely did not use your own words. This is not the first time you have made talk page claims that are obviously false ([https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adolescence&diff=next&oldid=1251530274 like when you denied adding blog links). You have to actually follow Wikipedia's policies, not violate them and then claim otherwise in subsequent talk page posts. MrOllie (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article Deleted

[edit]

October 2024

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 23:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:TALK#REVISE, you may not remove discussions on article talk pages (see the second paragraph under "Editing own comments"). Per WP:OWNTALK, you are permitted to remove any commentson your own talk page other than declined unblock requests. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know that, if you told me I wouldn't do that anymore. So I ask you to unblock my page and I won't do that anymore.Wiki7Hell (talk) 03:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster talk 03:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki7Hell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear administrator, you are penalizing me just because I want to delete my topics from the "Adolescence" page. You saw that we did not reach any consensus on my edit, and you wanted to reject it. I also do not intend to edit it anymore, because as I said we did not reach any consensus on the publication of my edit. I make this appeal because I have decided not to edit anymore on "Adolescence" unless you change your mind. I understand that you are the administrators who were just trying to maintain your points of view. Wiki7Hell (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say what you won't do anymore, but not what you will do. Nor do you seem to understand what was wrong with your recent editing. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki7Hell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will no longer make edits to the "adolescence" page or revert my topics. I don't really know what was wrong with my edit, but an admin told me what was wrong right after blocking me, but since I'm blocked now and can't fix the error, plus I don't know if I would risk trying to publish it. it again and lose my account. I understand my mistakes and I hope you understand that I am learning how to edit on Wikipedia and, therefore, I am prone to making many mistakes, but each mistake is a learning experience that teaches me to be better every day. Therefore, I kindly ask you to unblock my account. I appreciate your understanding and hope for a positive response soon. Wiki7Hell (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

On the one hand, you say, "I don't really know what was wrong with my edit". On the other hand, you say, "I understand my mistakes". These are directly contradictory and make it clear you are attempting to mislead us. Yamla (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you still don't understand what you did wrong, there's no reason to unblock you. You've continually ignored advices from at least three different editors and insulted them instead. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twenteen Years

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Twenteen Years, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Royiswariii (talk) 03:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created a new topic to answer you because, with this block on my account, it is impossible.

[edit]

@Yamla I don't know what's wrong with my editing, because I'm new to Wikipedia and I'm still learning how to edit, plus it's been 6 days since I learned how to create an article on Wikipedia since I created my account, on the other hand I understand my mistakes because @Ohnoitsjamie, told me that I should have added more context at the beginning of the article instead of directly citing an age range, to make the article more encyclopedic, but no, I'm not trying to trick you guys and there's no need to do that. I hope you understand it. Wiki7Hell (talk) 20:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie
I understand my mistake, and if you don't know I'm "human" and I have feelings, you blocked my account 2 times, 3 times with this one, and my secondary account permanently, and all my edits were disregarded by you, and instead of giving me constructive tips like @MrOllie did for a while, you thought I was having edit wars. Remember that each edit takes time and work to edit, and when you try over and over again and never get anywhere, as a "human" this is stressful and agonizing. Anyway, I apologize @Ohnoitsjamie, I didn't mean to offend anyone or create problems. Just like everyone else, I just wanted to contribute to Wikipedia, even though I'm a newbie here. Whether or not you prefer to unblock my account is up to you. I appreciate your attention and understanding, and I hope you don't take to heart the times I got stressed. Wiki7Hell (talk) 20:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not interested in unblocking you, as you don't seem to be willing or capable of following advice or instructions. You had plenty of chances to to do so, and chose to argue and edit-war instead. Note that I've disabled notifications from you so you need not waste your time tagging me anymore. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie
Well... do whatever you want, I don't care. I already apologized for what happened, if you want to accept it or not, that's your problem. I respect your point of view and I know that you were probably prejudiced by my username "Wiki7Hell" and that's why you hate me so much, but either way, I don't care about that, kid. Wiki7Hell (talk) 01:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie
Also, you were the one who showed the most hate in your behavior towards me. What motivated you to have so much hate towards me? Was it because of my name "Wiki7Hell"? Was it because of my point of view that was explicit in my edit? I don't even know you @Ohnoitsjamie, but if I knew you personally maybe we would be good friends. 😂 Wiki7Hell (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed sockpuppeteer. --Yamla (talk) 10:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wiki7Hell&oldid=1253101776"