User talk:Wiki-Nihaal

Ask doubt about chemistry over here if you like

Welcome!

Hi Wiki-Nihaal! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 07:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugènie Jeanne Devoir (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Loksmythe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Loksmythe (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wiki-Nihaal! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Loksmythe (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Loksmythe Wiki-Nihaal (talk) 03:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugènie Jeanne Devoir (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

References to offline sources are perfectly acceptable. There is work to do here. Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE

First, is the other of Coo Chanel notable in her own right? If so oy is up to you to assert it and verify it

Second, if and only is she is, the article is not yet even close to being an article, so it needs to become more than a list of facts

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 11:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise. That message was malformed and I have corrected it Fiddle Faddle 11:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fiddle Faddle . I have made a typo , it is Jeanne devolle . Please retain my draft under category G7. Thanks Wiki-Nihaal (talk) 04:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 12:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugènie Jeanne Devoir (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devoir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have highlighted Db-g7 already. Wiki-Nihaal (talk) 15:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've made sure it works. The tag was not fully formed on the draft. Now it is Fiddle Faddle 16:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source on Cinchona edit

Hi there! Do you mind adding the source you found the information from in this edit? If you could add it as a citation, that would be great. Thanks! - Whisperjanes (talk) 04:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugènie Jeanne Devolle (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tatupiplu was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tatupiplu'^talk 13:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Wiki-Nihaal. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Part of my answer to your question at the Teahouse about your fourth or fifth attempt in as many days to create Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle was to suggest that you read "Wikipedia:Competence is required" to appreciate some of the concerns I have over your approach to contributing here. I will not accept another attempt from you to create a page on the mother of Coco Channel until you understand our WP:NBIO notability criteria, and how you need to meet them by finding proper sources of information about here. If you don't understand that (and this comment yesterday says a lot about your failure to understand), then I need to ask you to stop trying until you do. If you can't find Reliable Sources about someone, then simply give up the task until you can. Period! So, please slow down; get a few hundred smaller edits under your belt, and perhaps you should give The Wikipedia Adventure interactive tour a go. There are 15 badges to collect as you learn the basics of editing. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible for me to do it,I do not use a laptop/computer for this Science Wiki Guy (talk) 06:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020: Note that most of your edits have been reverted

You seem very eager to make a contribution to Wikipedia; perhaps a bit too eager. Wikipedia has many rules you must follow in order to be a constructive editor. Here are some things to be aware of:

(1) any changes to article content require the proper citation of a reliable source. Please read about reliable sources and how to cite them properly. This means that, if something is common sense to you and you "just know it", you should only contribute it if you find and properly cite a reliable source which supports it.

(2) We all have favorite factoids which we discover and want to share, but sharing a factoid on Wikipedia may not be constructive (that is, it may not improve the encyclopedia). It is vital that you read over the article to see if it is actually in need of your contribution and will be a better article if you add it. Most factoids are too trivial to be of benefit to Wikipedia, like this addition. The more Wikipedia articles you read, the better you will know what makes a decent article and what content does not belong, per WP:NOTEVERYTHING.

(3) When you make an edit, use the to inspect your changes before publishing them. This prevents saving serial messes to an article's history as you did with E number.

(4) If you accidentally save a bad edit, you can undo it by going to the article's history and clicking the "undo" link for your bad edit, then publish the new version of the article with . Do not leave the bad edit for others to find and fix.

The advice you have been given regarding WP:The Wikipedia Adventure is something you should follow as soon as you can. It will help you in becoming a competent editor, although competence also comes from knowing when and where an edit is called for. Do not be over-eager to contribute to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is for reading and learning. If you find a deficit while reading an article, feel free to fix it, but try not to feel compelled to add to Wikipedia. It's big enough at the moment.

As for your draft article, Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle, you appear to be convinced that she is notable, since, without her, Coco Chanel would not have lived. That is not how Wikipedia views notability, and it's why we have no article on the mother of Michelangelo or the mother of Saddam Hussein. Wikipedia defines notability as wide coverage in reliable, published, independent sources, sources which have not covered Eugènie Devolle. That is why your draft can never be an article in Wikipedia.

Thank you for your enthusiasm for Wikipedia, and happy editing.--Quisqualis (talk) 00:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I actually tried adding content but the whole thing messed up and the MSG photo went away . And thank you for the information about notability.Science Wiki Guy (talk) 04:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Wiki-Nihaal! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to create a new language Wikipedia?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Wiki-Nihaal! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Info about Draft : Eugènie Jeanne Devolle, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jeanne Devolle

Hello, Wiki-Nihaal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeanne Devolle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle

Hello, Wiki-Nihaal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eugènie Jeanne Devolle

Hello, Wiki-Nihaal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eugènie Jeanne Devolle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]