User talk:Whippyice will

Welcome!

Hello, Whippyice will, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Oliver Céleste, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! David.moreno72 (talk) 14:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Oliver Céleste"

Oliver Céleste, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 14:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oliver Céleste

The article Oliver Céleste has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Largoplazo (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 55 (The Knocks album) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 55 (The Knocks album) was changed by Whippyice will (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965349 on 2016-06-04T15:57:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page For All We Know (NAO album) has been reverted.
Your edit here to For All We Know (NAO album) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.clashmusic.com/news/nao-announces-debut-album-for-all-we-know) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Classic (The Knocks song)

added a link pointing to Big Beat Records

Francesco Yates (album)

added a link pointing to Matt Morris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of M+A

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on M+A requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. OnionRing (talk) 12:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sigala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Newman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This Ain't Over (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Beat Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Don't Need No Money (Imani song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Say You Do. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BloodPop

The article BloodPop has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 17:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Digital Farm Animals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Beat Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dream Life (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Make Me Feel Better. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oliver Céleste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of This Ain't Over (song)

The article This Ain't Over (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laun chba ller 19:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oliver Céleste

The article Oliver Céleste has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laun chba ller 19:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Knocks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Beat Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmacy Galantis Album

Do you have a source for the Pharmacy (Galantis' album)'s track listing notes? How do you know the uncredited vocals are actually them? - TheMagnificentist (talk) 14:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Oliver Céleste

Hello, Whippyice will,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Oliver Céleste should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Céleste .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, TheMagnificentist (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hakuna Matoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Knight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LDN Noise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LDN Noise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LDN Noise (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 11:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Dream Life (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Dream Life (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Laun chba ller 19:01, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Two Vines. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Please don't combine the bonus tracks. Not every deluxe edition of Two Vines has "Walking on a Dream" as a bonus track. Only the North American editions do because of the ad that featured it there. Ss 112 00:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Whippyice will. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kingdom (Gorgon City album)

Hi, I'm Mz7. Whippyice will, thanks for creating Kingdom (Gorgon City album)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The next step should be to add more references to reliable sources. There is only one in the article and it appears now to be dead. Additionally, the article should be updated with new information if available.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mz7 (talk) 04:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding new albums to List of 2017 albums

Hey, just wanting to let you know as I see you editing List of 2017 albums sometimes: If you have information about a new album, you can create the redirect for the album, because there are certain users who have added that page to their watchlist (me included), who create redirects for all new albums added to the page that don't yet have articles without particularly caring about the artist or album, they just want to be the first to do it. I've also seen that you sometimes create content over the redirects for some albums, so just letting you know, you can (and maybe should) create the redirect yourself in future (before later adding content). Ss 112 05:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Producers for Zara Larrson in List of 2017 albums

Hello, Whippyice will.

For the last several days, someone, probably you, keeps adding new producers to the Zara Larsson untitled album that is expected in January 2017 in the List of 2017 albums article. However, you do not provide a citation for the producers that you list, and the current citations do not support the producers that you list, so the speculative producers keep getting deleted. Today, you also added a tag at the end of the producer list that says "Do not change". Of course I deleted it, along with the unsupported producers, but now I am writing on your talk page to encourage you to provide support for the changes that you are insistent to be kept. At this point, the album does not have a name or a Wikipedia page, so news articles are required to support your listings.

Thank you. Mburrell (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Ralph (record producer)

Hi, because of your note at the bottom of the page, I did not put a WP:BLPPROD tag on this article. Just as an FYI, all articles about living people must have at least one reference in them or else they can be nominated for deletion using the process I linked to above. The underconstruction template will give you some time, but someone will probably tag it if there is not a source in there soon. Once the tag is placed, it can be removed if there is a reliable source, but not otherwise. Just letting you know so you can fix the article :) TonyBallioni (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Ralph (record producer)

Hello, Whippyice will. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mark Ralph (record producer), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mark Ralph (record producer) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 00:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whippyice will, I went ahead and put this tag on since it has been eight hours in the new pages feed without any work. All you need to do to have it removed from this deletion process is to put a reliable source in it. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dancing With Myself (The Knocks song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dancing With Myself (The Knocks song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing With Myself (The Knocks song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Collect My Love for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Collect My Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collect My Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Wish (My Taylor Swift) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Wish (My Taylor Swift) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Wish (My Taylor Swift) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 18:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comfortable (The Knocks song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comfortable (The Knocks song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comfortable (The Knocks song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hi there. Its come to my attention that you are repeatedly creating articles with no sources other than an iTunes link. This is not acceptable on Wikipedia. A core, crucial part of Wikipedia is using reliable sources to verify the content of articles. Retail or digital distribution links are not sufficient - we're talking about articles written by third party music journalists from websites listed at WP:MUSIC/SOURCES. Album reviews, previews, announcements, etc.

If you continue to create articles with nothing other than an iTunes/retail link, you will start receiving short blocks from editing. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 16:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheMagnificentist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Music Is the Weapon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - TheMagnificentist 08:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Digital Farm Animals. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Skip Marley page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heat (The Knocks song)

Hello, Whippyice will. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Heat (The Knocks song), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Ravenswing 15:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Someday Somewhere (EP)

The article Someday Somewhere (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Climate Change (album). Magnolia677 (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Symphony (song)

Please at least wait until the song charts before recreating the article. Two references does not establish notability (per WP:NSONGS). Personally, I feel it should be at Symphony (Clean Bandit song) as there was previously content at Symphony (song) and it's a generic title for a song. Ss 112 19:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ed Sheeran discography. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

In It to Win It (Charlie Wilson album)

added a link pointing to Charlie Wilson

John Newman (singer)

added a link pointing to Charlie Wilson

List of 2017 albums

added a link pointing to Charlie Wilson

So Good (Zara Larsson album)

added a link pointing to Symphony (Clean Bandit song)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To Fall Out of Love To

Please do not change back bold markup (three apostrophes, ''') to a semicolon. This is against WP:PSEUDOHEAD. Thank you. Ss 112 21:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Can you please remove the wording you copied from my user page from your own? A user could assume that you are a sockpuppet or account of mine, and I'm pretty sure that violates some form of copyright that I hold over what I wrote on my own page. You didn't ask if you could copy it; you just did it, which is also quite rude. Ss 112 21:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've refused to explain yourself, I've chosen to remove the offending material from your user page myself. If you revert me, that's your choice, but then I will seek administrative attention. If permission is required, I do not give you permission to copy from my user page, even if you do ask after this as I don't know why I would when you've demonstrated that you are willing to copy without attribution. Even when using a site that has a free license, you still have to attribute where you copied said text from. Furthermore, surely you are capable of explaining what and how you edit without copying from other users. You are proficient in English, are you not? Therefore you can write a spiel out yourself. Ss 112 01:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francesco Yates (EP)

The article Francesco Yates (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 06:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Memories...Do Not Open, you may be blocked from editing. Ss 112 02:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at MNEK. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent addition of unverifiable content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bon Appétit (song). —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:26, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jhené Aiko discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bon Appétit (song). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great editor. - TheMagnificentist 17:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor sourcing

Please don't use josepvinaixa.com (aka "Ultimate Music") as a reference. It's an obscure blog with basically no real credibility that's quite often inaccurate. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Katy Perry discography. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 12:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Control (Uppermost album). Domdeparis (talk) 16:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Control (Uppermost album)

Hello, Whippyice will,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Control (Uppermost album) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control (Uppermost album) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Domdeparis (talk) 16:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Witness (Katy Perry album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Witness (Katy Perry album). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is your 5th block in roughly two months for the same behavior and is likely the last one you will get that has an expiration on it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whippyice will (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that my reason for getting blocked, understandably, was using a lot of poorly referenced content. I also understand that this is the same reason of why i was getting blocked four times previously. I want you as administrators to understand that my block was a terrible mistake and you completely misjudge the situation. As you may have noticed, my referencing abilities are getting better and are improving. But it is up to you whether you think I should continue improving and learning from my mistakes or not. In addition, there is some content, not most, that does not require or is not seen with a reference. This can be seen with songwriting and production credits on track listings for albums. I believe that, if people were to edit stuff like that, should say if they have a reference or not and, if they do, it should be added to the edit. In summary, I wish to edit, but it is up to you guy to let me continue on improving my referencing abilities, and I still do wish to continue being apart of this flourishing community. Thank you!

Decline reason:

You changed information without providing a reference that your change is correct. That's a problem, no matter what type of content it is. How could our readers, or other editors, tell your change wasn't actually making the article worse by inserting falsehoods? If you haven't learned the importance of citing reliable sources yet, I don't think a further trial-and-error approach will be beneficial to the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whippyice will (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that my reason for getting blocked, understandably, was using a lot of poorly referenced content. I also understand that this is the same reason of why i was getting blocked four times previously. I want you as administrators to understand that my block was a terrible mistake and you completely misjudge the situation. As you may have noticed, my referencing abilities are getting better and are improving and I really do want to follow the rules which are put in place for the Wikipedia community to abide by in order to keep its articles safe and secure. I believe that I am now ready to abide by these rules and am, therefore, ready to by unblocked. I and a few others that are a part of this community believe that I have the potential to be a very helpful part of the this community, but it is up to you guys to make the decision to turn it down. Please accept. Thank you.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2017

Hello, Whippyice will, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Whippy7 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Ss 112 22:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Whippyice will. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small text in infoboxes

Hi. Per Template:Infobox song, please stop using/inserting small text into infoboxes. Smaller text should not be used in them. Thank you. Ss112 21:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again on OMG (Gryffin and Carly Rae Jepsen song). Next time you add it, whatever you just added will be reverted outright. Don't ignore talk page messages. Read MOS:SMALLTEXT. Ss112 07:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rationale (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rationale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Courage (Celine Dion album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johan Carlsson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revival (Vancouver Sleep Clinic album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revival (Vancouver Sleep Clinic album), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revival (Vancouver Sleep Clinic album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Small Talk (EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Small Talk (EP), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Talk (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]