User talk:Wesxdz

Image layout algorithms moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Image layout algorithms, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Image layout algorithms (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Image layout algorithms and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Image layout algorithms, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wesxdz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Image layout algorithms

Hello, Wesxdz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Image layout algorithms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Image layout algorithms

Hello, Wesxdz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Image layout algorithms".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Relative robotics

Hello, Wesxdz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Relative robotics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Relative robotics

Hello, Wesxdz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Relative robotics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Wesxdz, and a (belated) welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Bespoke futuristic children's illustration style" images

… on End-of-history illusion among others. I think they're wonderful. So thanks! --Ernstkm (talk) 15:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Ernstkm! I originally created these visualizations to help game developers understand their own psychology: why video game projects are abandoned as unfinished creative work so frequently.

I'm glad you enjoy them :) Wesxdz (talk) 02:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These AI generated cartoons are an interesting approach to illustrating abstract concepts, but I'm not sure that they really do the job. If you don't have a particular vision in mind and ask the AI to draw you something based on a very general description like a woman's exterior appearance is not reflective of her internal state (as you did for illusion of transparency), the AI isn't always going to come up with a useful insight.

exterior appearance is not reflective of her internal state also seems too a broad description of the illusion of transparency, to the point where the illustration generated at File:Illusion of transparency.png seems to have it backwards: it's suggesting a woman who is privately very sad (the big background face) and where others can only see her neutral expression (the glasses signifying that the smaller face is the perceived reality), it doesn't seem to say anything about how she thinks other people see her. --Belbury (talk) 10:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury these illustrations are not direct AI outputs, but the result of an iterative process using multiple AI models, Krita, img2img...

if the illustrations are not able to capture the nuances of the cognitive biases, it is primarily due to a lack of time to make more sophisticated scenes or edit all 50+ I made...

whether cognitive biases can or should be grounded by scene representations of physical entities, and which ones, and if that is something that should go on Wikipedia is certainly an open question Wesxdz (talk) 00:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it's okay if you feel the need to remove this work from Wikipedia to make it more. neutral, as it's really just for a personal telos that knowledge should be embedded in the world to help people Wesxdz (talk) 00:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I took the Unknown environmental hazards endanger a woman's mental model of the world. Bespoke futuristic children's illustration style file descriptions to be the entirety of the prompts you were using. Commons AI policy encourages stating the prompt and AI software used in full, if you want to update the descriptions.

This is definitely a useful direction for illustration of psychological concepts, certainly better in many cases than user-created sketches. But such images need to be created with care if they are to help the reader understand the article. A purely decorative image that broadly illustrates the concept of a person thinking about time or danger is at best uninformative and at worst (when it slightly contradicts what the article is actually saying) a barrier to the reader understanding the subject. Belbury (talk) 08:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open-endedness

The article Open-endedness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

stub that just repeats whats in open-ended landing page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabet path of motion moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alphabet path of motion. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 15:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alphabet path of motion

Hello, Wesxdz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alphabet path of motion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alphabet path of motion

Hello, Wesxdz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alphabet path of motion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BLAR notice

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Open-endedness, likely does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article (and frankly, made no sense and offered no indication of what the concept meant). As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Open-ended. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]