User talk:Web-wiki-warrior

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Web-wiki-warrior. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 10:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 FC Chornomorets Odesa season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 FC Chornomorets Odesa season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 10:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019–20 FC Chornomorets Odesa season (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2019–20 FC Chornomorets Odesa season instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2019–20 FC Chornomorets Odesa season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2019–20 FC Chornomorets Odesa season, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Web-wiki-warrior! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Logo-Chornomorets-Stadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-Chornomorets-Stadium.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2020–21 FC Chornomorets Odesa season

Hello, Web-wiki-warrior,

Thank you for creating 2020–21 FC Chornomorets Odesa season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 20:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Igor Belanov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Odesa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please stop removing sourced and consensus content on Odesa/Odessa. While one version may be more prominent in English, both are commonly used. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Odesa#Pronunciation_of_the_city_name_in_the_article. Kind Regards. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 08:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you weren't just removing the pronunciation... you were removing Odessa also. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because "Odessa" is wrong if we translate from ukrainian to english. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't translating. The city has two English spellings: Odesa and Odessa. And in English they are pronounced the same. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you aren't translating, but in the article next to the spelling "Odessa" there is notice that it is the spelling by russian translation of the word Odessa to english. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that's a different situation than removing the English spelling Odessa. You'll note in the prior discussion that we were talking about how best to form the first sentence. Choices like the following would work better:

Odesa (Оде́са, Оде́сса) or Odessa
Odesa (Ukrainian: Оде́са, Russian: Оде́сса) or Odessa
Odesa or Odessa ;- note: we'd put all the foreign pronunciation stuff in the name section.

But we must maintain both prevalent English spellings. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we must maintain both prevalent English spellings, and/or it would work better. Take a look at EN-article about ukrainian city Dnipro ... here there is only ukrainian spelling: 1. of the current city name; 2. of the former city name (as city belonged to USSR).Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 10:08, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We always have both prevalent English spellings if there are two, and I would hazard a guess that Odessa is the most common spelling among average Americans. If the city is called Dnipro in English we wouldn't have two spellings in the lead. However the Dnieper river has two English spellings so we use both. Similar to Kyiv/Kiev. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

>among average Americans

The whole English-speaking world (=english native speakers) isn't just Americans.

>However the Dnieper river has two English spellings so we use both.

Ok, but you don't write there the first spelling is ukrainian, and the second one — russian, and so on.

Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 09:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Allrise Capital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Allrise Capital, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://allrisecapital.com/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I visited the page, and started Talk about "Contest deletion", but your hasty wiki colleagues deleted the article :(((

It's not a good style! This is an absolute disaster! Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Your edit to Allrise Capital has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Whpq (talk) 19:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to write this in your own words. It also looks like advertising because you copied text from company press release. Don't do that. -- Whpq (talk) 19:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was on the way to write this in my own words! It was not necessary to delete the article completely! At least there remains the Ukrainian version, which is gradually being improved. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 20:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was necessary to delete the article. It consisted of copyrighted material. Wikipedia require the content to be freely licensed. Do not copy copyrighted text. -- Whpq (talk) 20:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you. It was not necessary to delete the article. A small style's update can be done instead of delete the article. The EN-article will be created here sooner or later.Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then you are disagreeing with the third pillar of Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man, don't be so picky! Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 21:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Allrise Capital

Hello Web-wiki-warrior,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Allrise Capital for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The firm is important enough, cause it is a sponsor of the ukrainian premier league football club "Chornomorets" Odesa, and furthermore the firm is owner of the Chornomorets's stadium.Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 10:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allrise Capital for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allrise Capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allrise Capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:28, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tamara Gorikha Zernya

Hello, Web-wiki-warrior. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tamara Gorikha Zernya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tamara Gorikha Zernya

Hello, Web-wiki-warrior. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tamara Gorikha Zernya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023–24 FC Chornomorets Odesa season moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023–24 FC Chornomorets Odesa season. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting needed grammatical edits

Now more than once, you have wholesale reverted needed grammatical edits at 2022–23 FC Chornomorets Odesa season. An article is not a proprietary space. When edits are needed, as was the case at 2022–23 FC Chornomorets Odesa season, it is acceptable for anyone to make them, if done correctly. My grammatical corrections have not changed the meanings of the sentences, and they have fixed glaring and obvious problems in each sentence. You have, however, undone each of them, reverting the sentences to their previous incorrect forms. This borders on violations of WP:NOTHERE and WP:COMPETENCE. If you are unable to recognize the grammatical mistakes you are making in writing the sentences in the "Timeline" section of this article, you might want to reconsider whether you are capable of continuing to edit on the English-language version of Wikipedia. If you are unwilling to allow someone else to edit a page due to a feeling of propriety over it, or for any other reason at all, please review WP:CO to remind yourself that Wikipedia is by nature collaborative. Anwegmann (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

>My grammatical corrections have not changed...

Your "corrections" have changed the content: For example you have deleted information about friendly match Zimbru-Chornomorets played July 9, 2022. Why? Every professional soccer team in the world plays friendly matches. What is so wrong in the case? Moreover, as you deleted it you added a comment "senseless". Why this information is senseless?

>You have, however, undone each of them, reverting the sentences to their previous incorrect forms.

I think it is not true. I revised and corrected sentences. They may not be 100% consistent with Wikipedia's style, but they were grammatically correct after my corrections.

Please show me an example using the em dash in a Wikipedia-article, you use by your "corrections"? I mean your constructions like following:
* any date—In the 1th round, and so on.

Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 07:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, wholesale reverting needed grammatical edits

You have wholesale reverted needed grammatical edits again, this time at 2023–24 FC Chornomorets Odesa season. An article is not a proprietary space. When edits are needed, as was the case at 2023–24 FC Chornomorets Odesa season, it is acceptable for anyone to make them, if done correctly. My grammatical corrections have not changed the meanings of the sentences, and they have fixed glaring and obvious problems in each sentence. You have, however, undone each of them, reverting the sentences to their previous incorrect forms. This borders on violations of WP:NOTHERE and WP:COMPETENCE. If you are unable to recognize the grammatical mistakes you are making in writing the sentences in the "Timeline" section of this article, you might want to reconsider whether you are capable of continuing to edit on the English-language version of Wikipedia. If you are unwilling to allow someone else to edit a page due to a feeling of propriety over it, or for any other reason at all, please review WP:CO to remind yourself that Wikipedia is by nature collaborative.

Also, the fact that you freely admit that your edits "may not be 100% consistent with Wikipedia's style" is further evidence of your inability to follow standard consensus and work collaboratively. Additionally, the fact that you don't seem to recognize the awkward phrasing, grammatical mistakes, and passive voice used in your sentences, and you seem to think that reverting my corrections counts as revision and correction, is further evidence of a lack of WP:COMPETENCE. Again, you do not own these articles. You are not the proprietor of the content in these articles. I am correcting obvious mistakes in written English that need to be fixed.

Also, if you want to use the team's nickname in the article's body, you must both capitalize it and include a clear explanation of the nickname. One way to do this is to add it to the infobox or to the lead. Anwegmann (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

>You have wholesale reverted needed grammatical edits again, this time at 2023–24 FC Chornomorets Odesa season. An article is not a proprietary space. When edits are needed, as was the case at 2023–24 FC Chornomorets Odesa season, it is acceptable for anyone to make them, if done correctly. My grammatical corrections have not changed the meanings of the sentences, and they have fixed glaring and obvious problems in each sentence. You have, however, undone each of them, reverting the sentences to their previous incorrect forms.

imho not true ... I didn't change the sentences to an incorrect form

>Also, the fact that you freely admit that your edits "may not be 100% consistent with Wikipedia's style" is further evidence of your inability to follow standard consensus and work collaboratively.

imho it provides no evidence of any inability...

>Additionally, the fact that you don't seem to recognize the awkward phrasing, grammatical mistakes, and passive voice used in your sentences, and you seem to think that reverting my corrections counts as revision and correction, is further evidence of a lack of WP:COMPETENCE.

imho not true. I've recognized and corrected sentences to a grammatically correct form. FYI: awkward phrasing is not end of the world :)

>Again, you do not own these articles. You are not the proprietor of the content in these articles. I am correcting obvious mistakes in written English that need to be fixed.

very nice

>Also, if you want to use the team's nickname in the article's body, you must both capitalize it and include a clear explanation of the nickname. One way to do this is to add it to the infobox or to the lead.

The team's nickname is known and has been provided in the team's info box.

...

I miss your explanations about why you deleted text about friendly match Zimbru-Chornomorets (s. 2022–23 FC Chornomorets Odesa season), and why did you comment on this information as meaningless? Also, the facts are further evidences of your inability to follow the subject of the article and work collaboratively.

Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 10:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Please stop overlinking in the article 2023–24 FC Chornomorets Odesa season. This is now the third time I've been forced to leave a note on your talk page about not following Wikipedia standards. Please follow clearly delineated practices, established both in the Wikipedia Manual of Style and by consensus (in this case at WP:OVERLINK). You are overlinking in the same section of the article, which is unwarranted, especially given the very short length of the section. Continuing to refuse to edit according to Wikipedia standards will fall under the standard of disruptive editing. Anwegmann (talk) 22:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Yaroslav Kysil

Hello Web-wiki-warrior, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Yaroslav Kysil, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaroslav Kysil (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 23:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Vladyslav Kalyn

Hello Web-wiki-warrior, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Vladyslav Kalyn, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Kalyn.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 23:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Roman Savchenko (footballer)

Hello Web-wiki-warrior, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Roman Savchenko (footballer), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Savchenko (footballer) (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaroslav Kysil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yaroslav Kysil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Yaroslav Kysil. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. C F A 💬 00:51, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaroslav Kysil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yaroslav Kysil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaroslav Kysil. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your edit to Kyinka has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Wikishovel (talk) 13:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to 2024–25 FC Chornomorets Odesa season‎, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Please stop adding unnecessary links to deleted and/or non-existent pages. You have already reverted several attempts to correct this issue without any explanation, which borders on edit warring—a much more serious offense than it needs to be. Anwegmann (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to FC Chornomorets Odesa, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Please stop adding unnecessary links to deleted and/or non-existent pages. You have already reverted several attempts to correct this issue without any explanation, which borders on edit warring—a much more serious offense than it needs to be. Anwegmann (talk) 20:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which links do you mean? Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to FC Chornomorets Odesa, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. This is the second we've had to warn you about this. You continuously revert delinking without explaining your actions in the edit summary. Anwegmann (talk) 16:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Anwegmann (talk) 16:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Калин Владислав Тарасович

Статтю про вище вказаного футболіста англійською мовою я встиг скопіювати й написав про нього українською. Отож ваша праця була не зовсім даремною. Дми88 (talk) 16:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Pshenychnyuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Pshenychnyuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Pshenychnyuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Direct question requiring a response

Web-wiki-warrior, as per Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, were you paid in any way for your contributions to Allrise Capital? Daniel (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Why did you ask it?

2. I had/have nothing to do with "Allrise Capital".

3. I wasn't paid for my contributions to "Allrise Capital". Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 19:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because you wrote a ridiculously-promotional article about a non-notable company, that started with "Allrise Capital Inc. is a multi-strategy investment firm with a direct investment mandate covering real estate, venture capital and special situations opportunities in the US and select emerging markets. Investment process of the firm is oriented around fundamental research on asset classes, sectors and companies to identify asymmetric risk/reward opportunities." This behaviour is generally associated with paid editing. Daniel (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but imho you are completely wrong, especially about "I wrote a ridiculously-promotional article". Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 19:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the article was deleted (the first time, including the version I quoted above) for WP:CSD#G11, "Unambiguous advertising or promotion", I think it is you that is wrong. Daniel (talk) 19:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the person who deleted the article thinks it was advertising/promotion, then that is their opinion, not mine. And I have already answered you ("I wasn't paid for the article"). That's why you're wrong in my opinion. Kind Regards Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Web-wiki-warrior. Thank you for your work on Zhavynka. Another editor, CanonNi, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the article. I've assessed it as Start class and performed some general fixes.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]