User talk:Walluu2

Welcome!

Hello, Walluu2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Walluu2, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zaid Saad Al Khayyat moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zaid Saad Al Khayyat. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Al Khayyat Investments moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Al Khayyat Investments. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello Walluu2. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Al Khayyat Investments, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Walluu2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Walluu2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GPL93 (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out and providing guidance regarding Wikipedia’s Terms of Use.

I would like to clarify that I am not involved in paid editing, nor am I receiving any form of compensation for my contributions. My intent in building this account is to contribute meaningfully to the Wikipedia community in accordance with the platform’s policies and guidelines.

I understand and respect the importance of transparency and the principles that support Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will ensure my contributions align with these standards.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please let me know if there are any further clarifications I can provide. Walluu2 (talk) 14:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out and providing guidance regarding Wikipedia’s Terms of Use.

I would like to clarify that I am not involved in paid editing, nor am I receiving any form of compensation for my contributions. My intent in building this account is to contribute meaningfully to the Wikipedia community in accordance with the platform’s policies and guidelines.

I understand and respect the importance of transparency and the principles that support Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will ensure my contributions align with these standards.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please let me know if there are any further clarifications I can provide. Walluu2 (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a response generated by a Large Language Model. Since you have not written this declaration yourself it is invalid. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Jannat Mirza, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Walluu2, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Walluu2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You must use your own words when you respond 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My God, I am contributing to the community and I am not being involved in paid editing why am I being targeted? Walluu2 (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer the question. It is a question that can be posed to anyone, at any time. Answer in your own words without use of AI. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MY apologies. I see that you have answered it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem! I am happy to contribute to the community and learn from the seniors.

Thank you Walluu2 (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Walluu2. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Jannat Mirza, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Walluu2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Walluu2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib just above I felt I had a satisfactory negative answer to this question. Do you disagree? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am neither being paid nor involved in paid editing! How can I prove please advise! Walluu2 (talk) 14:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for restating it. This direct answer is all that you need to provide. It also provides somewhat greater clarity. than prior answers 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timtrent, OK, I didn’t notice there was already a note from you. However, if this editor isn’t a paid editor, I hope they won’t waste time—neither theirs nor ours—creating articles on non-notable subjects. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib Their time and ours is no longer wasted. Blocked as a sock. Just not the master I thought. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fayçal Lalioui moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fayçal Lalioui. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out and providing guidance regarding Wikipedia’s Terms of Use.

I would like to clarify that I am not involved in paid editing, nor am I receiving any form of compensation for my contributions. My intent in building this account is to contribute meaningfully to the Wikipedia community in accordance with the platform’s policies and guidelines.

I understand and respect the importance of transparency and the principles that support Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will ensure my contributions align with these standards.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please let me know if there are any further clarifications I can provide.

Walluu2 (talk) 20:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All three articles you have created are promotional in tone. Please submit as drafts for review. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed one and will submit other 2 through AFC

Thanks Walluu2 (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not "fixed" and is referenced with paid press, press releases, and unreliable sources. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fayçal Lalioui

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fayçal Lalioui, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jannat Mirza moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jannat Mirza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Notability not demonstrated. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither I am being paid to edit nor involved in this, as this page does not demonstrates notability the above 3 pages are notable and being removed? Am I being specifically targeted? Walluu2 (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not being targeted. New entrants to mainspace are scrutinised. I scrutinised this one and returned it to draft. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and thank you, if there is any suggestion you have for me I would be happy to learn. Walluu2 (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may be writing drafts WP:BACKWARDS. Please start by finding references, and only then start the draft. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion. Appreciated! Walluu2 (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Amansharma111 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amansharma111. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 15:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]