Jump to content

User talk:WaftCinematic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paanie Kashyap (November 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Does not meet the the notability guidelines for actresses. Also, standard announcements about films, such as trailers, castings, etc. are considered trivial coverage and interviews are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, WaftCinematic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohan Lal Commodity Management Pvt Ltd (November 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for corporations at this time. Also reads like a promotional press release in the article's current state, saying "directly touched the livelihoods" is not neutral and not warranted in the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 09:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajveer Deol has been accepted

[edit]
Rajveer Deol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 09:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for approving the articles of me, Puran Davar and Rajveer Deol. I've just joined Wikipedia and am trying to learn. I hope that I will continue to get your guidance in future also. Thank you WaftCinematic (talk) 13:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, WaftCinematic!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Designing Forum (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at World Designing Forum instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Simply merge the content of this draft to the one already in mainspace at World Designing Forum.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Designing Forum (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Submitted twice without improvement and then created in mainspace. The bypass of AfC without improvement is concerning but since we have one in the mainspace now, no need to resubmit this draft. Will handle the live page separately.
CNMall41 (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC versus Mainspace

[edit]

I see that you created the page World Designing Forum and Sohan Lal Commodity Management Pvt Ltd despite them both being declined as Draft:World Designing Forum and Draft:Sohan Lal Commodity Management Pvt Ltd respectively. You are not required to submit pages through AfC but bypassing the process after submission, along with other editing patterns, gives the impression you have a conflict of interest related to these pages. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ankush Anami

[edit]

Hello WaftCinematic, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ankush Anami, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankush Anami.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CNMall41}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CNMall41 (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about World Designing Forum

[edit]

Hello WaftCinematic, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, World Designing Forum, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Designing Forum.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CNMall41}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CNMall41 (talk) 19:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no disclaimer in any article in World Designing Forum and this is a correct article. Please give it permanent recognition. WaftCinematic (talk) 06:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Palak Tiwari

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Palak Tiwari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palak Tiwari. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palak Tiwari is a young famous actress, there is no need to tell me about her introduction, that is why her page should not be removed. If it needs improvement then help me in improving it. Thank you. WaftCinematic (talk) 13:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

I previously notified you about your editing giving the appearance of you having a conflict of interest. You have continued to edit and create new pages (and responding to your talk page messages) and yet have not responded to this notice. Let me ask a clear question - "Do you have a connection, financially or otherwise, with the subjects of the pages you have created?" CNMall41 (talk) 19:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Akhil Bharatiya Karan Samaj Mahasabha moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Akhil Bharatiya Karan Samaj Mahasabha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Sending to draft space for review. Too many of these creations by user have been deleted or recommended for deletion. No response to COI request. Will take to COIN if no response is received. For now, saving time and allowing for this to incubate in draft space. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 19:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhil Bharatiya Karan Samaj Mahasabha (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhil Bharatiya Karan Samaj Mahasabha (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. N. Reddy (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Missvain was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The articles are only mentioning the subject in passing. At this time, this subject does NOT merit inclusion Wikipedia.
Missvain (talk) 16:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shehzad Poonawala for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shehzad Poonawala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shehzad Poonawala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While greeting elder brother, I want to tell you that Shahzad Poonawala is the official spokesperson of Bharatiya Janata Party. Information about him is available on the official website of the Bharatiya Janata Party as well as in many major news publications as source links, hence this page. should not be removed WaftCinematic (talk) 06:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chandrani Das for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chandrani Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrani Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Katy Williamson (talk) 11:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page written is absolutely true, there is no problem in it, then why has it been put on deletion? WaftCinematic (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S.N Reddy for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S.N Reddy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.N Reddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandeep Sabharwal for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandeep Sabharwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Sabharwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Schirin Thoma moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Schirin Thoma. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because It was disambiguated as the actual name was deleted a few months back for being created by a blocked or banned user which there is now evidence this was as well. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Waft Studios moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Waft Studios. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Editor has a coi and not reporting to noticeboard entry. Seems to be promoting "PR and Wikipedia Services for India's Entertainment and Corporate Industry". I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creepTalk 08:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schirin Thoma (November 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

Given your creation of Draft:Waft Studios, which advertises "Wikipedia solutions that illuminate narratives, forge connections, and push the boundaries of creative expression", your earlier refusal to respond to COI and paid disclosure requests, and your blatant spamming of non-notable articles using PR and SEO sourcing, I have disabled this account. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep in mind what you said in future. Please try to unblock my account, it will be a great favor to me. WaftCinematic (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No thank you; I don't do favors. You've been editing in violation of our terms of use. You'll need to read the links to WP:PAID that you have been previously given and comply with the required disclosures. You'll also need to change the name of this account, as we do not allow account names that are promotional or indicate group usage. Once that is complete, we can talk about your usage of black hat SEO garbage sources and promotional editing. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I will create a new page and avoid violating all Wikipedia rules from now on. I assure you that you will not get any complaint from me in future. I pray that I will follow your orders like a younger brother. Please try to unblock my IP address, I will be grateful to you. WaftCinematic (talk) 18:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajveer Deol for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajveer Deol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajveer Deol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creepTalk 17:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have been blocked for editing on Wikipedia and Rajveer Deol is an Indian film actor. He is the son of MP and actor Sunny Deol. You are requested to unblock me for editing and editing on Wikipedia. I assure you that I will not do anything in the future that is against Wikipedia's rules. As soon as my account is unblocked, I will provide all the evidence as reference to Wikipedia. WaftCinematic (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have that capability unfortunately. scope_creepTalk 19:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bikrookanpurgangster per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bikrookanpurgangster. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 10:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WaftCinematic&oldid=1197406939"