User talk:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h/historical archive/2013

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Skyfall by Hahc21. Project News: A record, and issue and a future. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 190 articles passed in December! GA Task Forces: Results from the drive Member News: Two crucial users leave the project Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 3 January 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter

Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader ( Grapple X (submissions)) had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. 12george1 (submissions) was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:

• 12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
• Buggie111 (submissions) was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
• Spencer (submissions) was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
• Status (submissions) was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
• Adam Cuerden (submissions) was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:

• Ed! (submissions) was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
• Hawkeye7 (submissions) has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
• HueSatLum (submissions) claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of The C of E (submissions), who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 2 – February 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Time to make a Sweep by Hahc21. Project News: Several proposals are currently ongoin at the project, including two requests for comment. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 282 articles passed in January! GA Task Forces: Some minor notes this month Member News: Member news Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 12 February 2012

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

1. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
2. Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
3. Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

• Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
• Sasata (submissions), whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
• Muboshgu (submissions) and Wizardman (submissions), who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
• Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 11:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Cite DGRC

Some time ago you created Template:Diccionario Geográfico de la República de Chile entry

I have recently modified it to use what is now the standard parameter of "wstitle=" in place of "entry=". The letter=parameter is now redundant and removed (instead there is a string cut to do the same think automatically). I have also moved the template to a new name and created two other similar templates see:

• {{Cite DGRC}}
• {{DGRC}}
• {{DGRC poster}}

These are the names commonly used for this type of template. See Category:Wikisource link templates]] -- PBS (talk) 16:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Good Article Nominations Request For Comment

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here. At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr ( Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare ( Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus ( Keilana (submissions) and Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John ( Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Lists at FLC

If you have time or interest, feel free to take a look at my two lists at FLC: List of awards and nominations received by Fiona Apple and List of songs recorded by Pink Martini. Thanks so much! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place Casliber (submissions) and second place Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK RfC

• As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions03:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Cáhuil Bridge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cáhuil Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cáhuil Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 14:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! A GAN Backlog Drive will begin in less than 4 days! In past Backlog Drives, the goal was to reduce the backlog of Good article nominations. In the upcoming drive, another goal will be added - raising as much money as we can for the Wikimedia Foundation. How will this work? Well, its pretty simple. Any user interested in donating can submit a pledge at the Backlog Drive page (linked above). The pledge should mention the amount of money the user is willing to donate per review. For example, if a user pledges 5 cents per review and 100 nominations are reviewed, the total donation amount is $5.00. At the time this message was sent out, two users have submitted pledges for a total of 8 cents per review. All pledges, no matter how much money, are greatly appreciated. Also, in no way is this saying you must make a pledge. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or leave a message on the Backlog Drive talk page. And remember, there are less than 4 days before the drive starts!--EdwardsBot (talk) 03:12, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013! If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive! If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Skyfall by Hahc21. Project News: A record, and issue and a future. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 190 articles passed in December! GA Task Forces: Results from the drive Member News: Two crucial users leave the project Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 3 January 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter

Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader ( Grapple X (submissions)) had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. 12george1 (submissions) was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:

• 12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
• Buggie111 (submissions) was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
• Spencer (submissions) was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
• Status (submissions) was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
• Adam Cuerden (submissions) was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:

• Ed! (submissions) was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
• Hawkeye7 (submissions) has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
• HueSatLum (submissions) claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of The C of E (submissions), who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume IV, No. 2 – February 2013 For past newsletters click here

In This Issue Featured editorial: Time to make a Sweep by Hahc21. Project News: Several proposals are currently ongoin at the project, including two requests for comment. Good Articles of the Month: See which articles were picked this year of records: 282 articles passed in January! GA Task Forces: Some minor notes this month Member News: Member news Read this newsletter Single-page Unsubscribe Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot · 12 February 2012

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

1. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
2. Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
3. Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

• Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
• Sasata (submissions), whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
• Muboshgu (submissions) and Wizardman (submissions), who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
• Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 11:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Cite DGRC

Some time ago you created Template:Diccionario Geográfico de la República de Chile entry

I have recently modified it to use what is now the standard parameter of "wstitle=" in place of "entry=". The letter=parameter is now redundant and removed (instead there is a string cut to do the same think automatically). I have also moved the template to a new name and created two other similar templates see:

• {{Cite DGRC}}
• {{DGRC}}
• {{DGRC poster}}

These are the names commonly used for this type of template. See Category:Wikisource link templates]] -- PBS (talk) 16:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Good Article Nominations Request For Comment

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here. At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr ( Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare ( Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus ( Keilana (submissions) and Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John ( Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Lists at FLC

If you have time or interest, feel free to take a look at my two lists at FLC: List of awards and nominations received by Fiona Apple and List of songs recorded by Pink Martini. Thanks so much! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place Casliber (submissions) and second place Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Los Ángeles Negros was changed by Lester Foster (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967589 on 2012-09-20T15:54:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Ángeles Negros

The article Los Ángeles Negros you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Los Ángeles Negros for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis (✔) 09:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Do you have plans getting the Lolol murder to FA-status? It would be interesting to see it on the mainpage. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 09:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it would be cool. I'm gonna request a peer review in the next days before I do anything else, though. Lester Foster (talk | talk) 01:58, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Happy Birthday (2012)

AFisch99 (talk) 13:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Civil Registry and Identification Service of Chile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maipú (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Release Version Nominations

Hi - thanks for your message. I hope to start reviewing these in the next few months.. The reason they've lain dormant for a while is that we didn't have the people we needed to work on a new release, and if there's no new release there's no incentive to review! However, we now have two new key people helping in the project, and we're currently trying to get a server to host the vandalism checking (it needs to be a VERY BIG server) - we're aiming to release Version 0.9 during this year. If we get the server going and someone to watch it, we'll be able to start producing regular collections, and maybe even produce Version 1.0, finally! Cheers, Walkerma (talk) 07:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia

User:Lester Foster can't see who is masquerading as this user. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 00:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1985 Pichilemu earthquake, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Osorno and Cordoba Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

SUP DIEGO

how did your sister Natalie Grez did in this elections? Did she at least got it into SERVEL's list? We all at the GNAA missed you. 186.105.110.80 (talk) 19:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Hugo Chavez

I put your ITN nom in proper format, please feel free to modify as you like. μηδείς (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Lester Foster; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Daniel Ortúzar

Hello! Your submission of Daniel Ortúzar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 02:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Daniel Ortúzar

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for René Maturana

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for José María Caro Martínez

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cheer C.P.S.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:RFPERM

Any reason you can't access your old account? Unless you have lost access to the email address used to create that account or there was no email address associated with the account, you should be able to request a password reset. Pol430 talk to me 20:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

It's not possible for me to request a password reset, otherwise I would have done so, trust me. There is no e-mail associated with it and so I cannot do anything for the account. Lester Foster (talk | talk) 20:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Considering it has been previously compromised, it's probably best to abandon that account anyway; it's unlikely it will ever be unblocked on wikinews. I've left a comment at RFPERM. Pol430 talk to me 09:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Basilio Sánchez

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlos Echazarreta Iñiguez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colegio San Ignacio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Mario Bichón

Please return to the DYK nomination — you forgot to specify what nomination you reviewed. Nyttend (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Carlos Echazarreta Iñiguez

SpinningSpark 10:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC) 17:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to WDL!

Hi Lester Foster! I'm so happy to see you signed up for the WDL project! Welcome aboard. I saw you're interested in Latin America and Chilean subjects. I have created a to-do list for Latin America here. There is a small section about Chile. You also might stumble across some more things here. Be sure to add the to-do list to your watch list, as I'll be adding more content to it. And don't forget to share your outcomes on the outcomes page. If I can be of an assistance just ask, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 17:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mario Bichón

The DYK project (nominate) 00:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

El Mercurio

Hello. I have noticed that you are from Chile, and I would like a small clarification. There is an article on a newspaper El Mercurio de Valparaíso and El Mercurio, based in Valparaíso. Both ones seem to have been created in 1827, and none of them mention the other. Are they 2 different newspapers (perhaps with some detail wrong, confused with the other), or is it the same one, and someone created a second article by mistake? Cambalachero (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Carlos Rojas Pavez

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited René Maturana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Jara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Pisco Sour

Hello. There is a FAC on the Pisco Sour cocktail at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pisco Sour/archive2, a national drink of Peru and Chile. The nominator is Peruvian, and the discussion may be benefited with the presence of a Chilean user as well, to confirm that we are not leaving anything important out of the article. Cambalachero (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for José Lino Vargas

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

José María Caro Martínez

I've begun the GA review for José María Caro Martínez. This looks ripe for promotion, but I'd like your thoughts on a few points. Thanks for all your work on it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring José María Caro Martínez to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Once again, Khazar, thank you for taking the time to review the article, it is really appreciated :-) Regards, Lester Foster (talk | talk) 03:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure. -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Eduardo Parraguez

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Washington Saldías

Orlady (talk) 08:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pedro Pablo Caro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pedro Pablo Caro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - Vivvt (Talk) 01:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Rosa Otarola

Would you mind explaining this[1]? Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 06:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination: Cornejo

Hello! Your submission of Orlando Cornejo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ComputerJA (talk) 01:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pedro Pablo Caro

Hello! Your submission of Pedro Pablo Caro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Iselilja (talk) 08:28, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Gustavo Parraguez

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Orlando Cornejo

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Precious

Pichilemu
Thank you for quality articles for project Chile on education, such as List of schools in the Cardenal Caro Province, and people such as the mayors of Pichilemu including Orlando Cornejo, stressing democracy on the Main page, and for Komm, gib mir deine Hand, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for this! I did not expect it at all, I'm happy that there is people who actually take the time to read Pichilemu articles, thank you again! Regards, Lester Foster (talk | talk) 01:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Coat of arms of Pichilemu

The DYK project (nominate) 03:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Pisco Sour

Hola Lester,
I hope all is well. User:Ian Rose asked me to send you a notice about the Pisco Sour FAC. Could you please provide an update in your analysis of the content?
Thanks again for the earlier thorough review you gave the work. I know this topic causes bubbles like soap on water, but I am on the same side as you on the topic of Pisco (the brandy) and often keep my eyes open to keep a NPOV status on that article.
Saludos.--MarshalN20 | ^Talk 17:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'll get to it ASAP, I've been offline for the last five days or so, I will try to review your comments tomorrow, sorry about this. Regards, Lester Foster (talk | talk) 01:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

FLC for Mayor of Pichilemu

Hi. I've finished my review of your FLC candidate and I'm very satisfied with the changes you've made. I've placed my comments in a resolved template and given the list my support. If you happen to get too bored, would you be willing to look at my FLC candidate, List of Sega 32X games? Thanks. Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}_{remember the past...} 02:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I will! :) Lester Foster (talk | talk) 05:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pedro Pablo Caro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Pablo Caro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Pablo Caro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership Newsletter

Expand Wikipedia's free knowledge with WDL resources!

Hi Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:

• We have an easy way to now cite WDL resources. You can learn more about it on our news page, here.
• Our to-do list is being expanded and features newly digitized and created resources from libraries and archives around the world, including content from Sweden, Qatar, the Library of Congress, and more! You can discover new content for dissemination here.
• WDL project has new userbox for you to post on your userpage and celebrate your involvement. Soffredo created it, so please be sure to thank them on their talk page. You can find the userbox and add it to your page here.
• Our first batch of WDL barnstars have been awarded! Congratulations to our first recipients: ProtoplasmaKid, ChrisGualtieri, TenthEagle, Rhyswynne, Luwii, Sosthenes12, Djembayz, Parkwells, Carl Francis, Yunshui, MrX, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and the prolific Yster76!! Thank you for your contributions and keep up the great work. Be sure to share your article expansions and successes here.

Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree with your Rfd

I also ask you in good faith to assume good faith and employ patience before you seek destruction of an article. Also, with all due respect, I would not support any of your applications to become an admin. Worldedixor (talk) 07:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your nom at WP:TFLS

Lester, the TFL submissions page holds a maximum of 10 lists at a time, per the instructions on the page. This is meant to prevent an excessive number of potential candidates that might clog up the process. Since the nomination you made was the 11th on the page, I have removed it for now. When one or more of the current noms gets promoted or rejected, feel free to renominate the list at TFLS. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Oops, I did not see that, sorry about it! I will re-nominate when one of the nominations is gone, regards, Lester Foster (talk | talk) 02:00, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Liceo Santa Cruz de Triana may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The high school emphasizes abilities in arts,<ref>[{cite news|url=http://www.elrancahuaso.cl/admin/render/noticia/19684|title=Alumnos del Liceo Santa
• no|language=Spanish|archivedate=8 July 2013|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6HyNCpMCV}}</ref> and sports: one of its students earned a gold medal at the national tournament Juegos

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armando Caroca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical Party of Chile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Pedro Pablo Caro

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for El Puerto (newspaper)

Alex Shih(talk) 08:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Charitar 373

What is link of Golbal Wikisource?

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by To.harpreet (talk • contribs) 06:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, wikisource.org is the URL of the global edition of Wikisource; I have just looked in there and your text might be the first Punjabi one over there! Regards, Küñall (talk) 06:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of schools in Cardenal Caro know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on September 16, 2013. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/September 16, 2013. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. Thanks! Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

There are sixty-three schools in Cardenal Caro, one of the three provinces of Libertador General Bernardo O'Higgins Region in Chile. The province contains several primary schools and eight secondary schools. All schools in Cardenal Caro are municipal (owned by the government of their respective communes) except the Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu (pictured) and the Colegio Charly's School, which are semi-private (subsidized by the state). Forty-seven schools are located in rural areas, while the remaining sixteen are located in urban areas. All of them are coeducational. In 2010, there were seventy-eight schools in Cardenal Caro, with 7,400 students in total. As of 2012, the number of students in the province decreased to 6,681. The Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre in Pichilemu has the most students, with 558, and is followed by the Liceo Agustín Ross Edwards, also in Pichilemu, with 504, and the Escuela Cardenal Raúl Silva Henríquez in Litueche, with 489.

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

El Rancagüino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tabloid

El Siglo (Chile) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tabloid

Fortín Mapocho (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tabloid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Clarín (Chilean newspaper)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clarín (Chilean newspaper), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://redaccion1.bligoo.com.ar/diario-clarin.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clarín (Chilean newspaper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

What does your username mean?

What does your username mean? Im curious. —Soap— 04:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi there Soap. It's a Mapudungún language (from the Mapuche indigenous people in southern Chile) word, meaning "whip". Regards, Küñall (talk) 02:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Coat of arms of Pichilemu

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Coat of arms of Pichilemu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 01:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cristina Barra.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cristina Barra.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=433793079989667&set=a.433792573323051.89535.166885400013771&type=1&theater. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Please act in good faith and do not archive my comments every day

Listen, chico aka Master in the English language. You left me an instigating message that I respectfully copied below for your easy reference, yet you archived mine. Please stop acting in bad faith. Wikipedia has a million articles that need your free time, so get busy. Please do not come and threaten to delete my article of Aida, a notable person, and please do not revert 3 times my edits without ANY discussion. You are not a dictator here and your POV is not all that matters in Wikipedia. I will assume good faith and ask you not to bother me or try again to delete the article on Aida. I will also NEVER support any for your applications for admin. If you are already an admin, I request that you teach me how to file a complaint against you, which is your responsibility. Worldedixor (talk) 18:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

• "Firstly, the guy used content taken from the Ukrainian Wikipedia, and as such, we need to comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license (which this Wikipedia version also uses). Secondly, please stop restoring deleted content which makes no sense at all in English, you are overriding the WP:3RR. Thirdly, I suppose (per comment above: "preferably a fan of hers") you are a fan of this person; it does not make your point more valid if you are a fan of hers; as I said, the content you are restoring makes no sense in English language. Let alone if this gets to survive AFD. Regards, Küñall (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)"

Your GA nomination of Coat of arms of Pichilemu

The article Coat of arms of Pichilemu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Coat of arms of Pichilemu for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 08:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giorgio Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Europa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your help is highly needed

New discussion about expansion of the 2013 Bohol earthquake. For the discussion, please click this link: Expansion discussion.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 13:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu Students' Center

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu Students' Center you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 04:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

• Hi, LT910001. My two cents. This article is about nothing more than a student center in an obscure town, one of millions in every small town in every country all round the world. It is certainly not notable (not Harvard University, for example). Do we want every student center in small towns, for example Leiva, Colombia, to start a Wikipedia article and post pictures of its students in an encyclopedia? I already removed self-promoting pictures and unsourced content by this editor, Küñall, and nominated it for afd. Worldedixor (talk) 08:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Have you been spying on my Facebook? (Leiva, Colombia) Worldedixor, this has gone far enough for me to report you to administrators. Küñall (talk) 14:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

For your information

There is no such thing as a "3RR exemption: reverting unjustified removal of sourced content". [2] You might do as well to self-revert. Not least because I am beginning to wonder whether the naming and identifying by photographs of non-notable minors in the article is a violation of WP:BLP policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

• I value your input, AndyTheGrump, and as per WP:BLP, non-notability, and absence of "authorization to publish" pictures and names of minors, I removed the names and pictures on these non-notable minors or otherwise. Please feel free to re-insert them if you opine differently and should remain in Wikipedia. Worldedixor (talk) 03:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

WP:AFD

Our articles for deletion page is not meant to be a place to get attention; in your words, the "point of this nomination was to draw attention of users interested in the topic (and others) that could help improve the article in question." Since we are all volunteers, and AfD is not the place to debate how to improve articles, and there is a sizeable backlog at WP:AFD, your nomination was in fact quite disruptive to our process. If you want to improve an article, please list it at the talk page of the appropriate project, such as Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Bearian (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu Students' Center

The article Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu Students' Center you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu Students' Center for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 01:52, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Roxana Miranda

Diego, first of all: the image that you insist to put in the article is of poor quality because it looks that it has been cropped and/or zoomed. That's not a professional image per se. Second: the image in the infobox is intended to be an image of the face of the person, more than a full or half-body shoot. In this case, i'm still prefering the first image over the photo that you uploaded. Third: you said about File:Roxana Miranda, foto promocional.jpg that "is official; focus on content". Please tell me in what cases an official photo (independent of their nature) is more suitable over an image that simply shows her face. And please clarify me what is "focus on content": political content, artistic content, social content, what? Anyway, the poor quality of the photo is the first thing i'm considering to remove it from the article, even more when there are lots of images (that you've uploaded to Commons) that are more suitable for the infobox. --Sfs90 (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

(respondo en español porque escribí en un principio en ese idioma) No conozco una guideline que diga que la imagen tenga que ser de tal o tal forma. Es cosa de basarse en otros artículos, como por ejemplo, el de Bill Gates, o el de Michelle Bachelet, para darse cuenta de que no necesariamente tiene que enfocar la cara solamente. La imagen que propones de Miranda no ayuda mucho a la comadre, sinceramente (y no es que necesariamente tenga que "ayudarla", sino que es, simplemente, una mala l foto). La imagen que he agregado es una versión recortada de esta otra. No veo otra imagen de igual o mejor calidad que esa para ser utilizada en el artículo, aunque esta ha sido utilizada en prensa; la recortaré, y añadiré al artículo. Cuando me refiero a "focus on content", me refiero a que el artículo requiere más contenido, que estar discutiendo por cosas mínimas, como la imagen del infobox. Saludos. Küñall (talk) 21:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

My response is in English because this is the English Wikipedia, not the Spanish one The latest image that you added to the article looks more reasonable. I'll keep that one, and the "focus on content" is given by anyone of the users who contribute here. If you think that a discussion of an image in an article is a "minimal thing", you must reconsider what Wikipedia is: not only the text, it's everything, including the design of any article. Any discussion that contributes to build better articles must be welcomed. And another thing: please do your responses in my talk page; i'm too busy with other things, and i haven't all the time to read your discussion or any other who put their responses in their own talk pages. --Sfs90 (talk) 21:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I prefer to keep discussions in a single place (even though my first post was on your talk page, this is common here on en.wiki). I meant that images, in general, ain't no controversial thing for an article. Regards, Küñall (talk) 22:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I think the discussion about the image is over. Nevertheless, an image is an important thing of an article, and the quality of that generally is a topic of discussion. And finally, I suggest you to take a look at WP:SPEAKENGLISH. --Sfs90 (talk) 13:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest, self-promotion, and abuse of Wikipedia for personal gratification.

Ok, here's the deal. Revert your recent edits to Colegio de la Preciosa Sangre de Pichilemu, delete the ridiculous categories you have created, [3][4] and stop using Wikipedia as a means to promote your entirely-non-notable self, or I will report you for abuse of Wikipedia for personal gratification. And no, there is probably no such policy, but I can think of half-a-dozen good reasons why your repeated attempts to promote yourself on Wikipedia is liable to be seen as detrimental to the project - the only real question in my mind is whether this is likely to result in a topic ban, or an indefinite block. I will give you 48 hours to respond, and then take this up at the appropriate place. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi there Andy. I'm not reverting the edits, I'd rather prefer discuss it on the article's talk page. My desire is not to promote myself, in fact, I have not done it with that purpose, I am not even trying to create an article on myself, that'd be sure ridiculous. It's just that students' centers' presidents are somewhat relevant to the article, I thought a list of former presidents (all of them are over 18 now) would be in order to make the article more complete. And in fact, there's nothing else I think it misses. Regarding the categories, they are absolutely not ridiculous, as other schools who have a series of articles do categorize their content that way. Discussion is the way, Andy, if you wish, you could check I have worked on some other good content. As I said, I am not doing it in a way to self-promote myself, and if I have made it look like that, I'm sorry, but I mantain my position that former presidents and the little collage are relevant to the article. Kind regards, Küñall (talk) 02:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

There is nothing remotely notable about a 'president' who represents 500 or so school students - it was already made abundantly clear at the recent AfD discussion that the 'student center' didn't in any way whatsoever meet our notability guidelines. As for your claim not to be promoting yourself, the misleading image caption you added with your photo ("former Preciosa Sangre authorities") suggests otherwise. Either remove your self-promotion, or expect to be held accountable for it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Andy, the students' center may not be worthy of its own article, granted. But it's definitely worth noting in the school's article; the school is the largest in the province, so even though it has 500 and something students, it's noteworthy. I will be changing the photograph to portray only one of these former or current authorities, I don't intend to promote myself, in fact, I have not had contact with anyone of the school for more than a year. My intention, as I said, is not to selfpromote nor anything, and I apologize for any inconvenience, it has not been my purpose. Regards, Küñall (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your actions demonstrate the contrary. If you weren't trying to promote yourself, you wouldn't keep inserting your name into articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

The names are significant to the article... if they weren't I would not have added them at first. Küñall (talk) 20:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Utter nonsense. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Stop this nonsense. You have great systemic bias. I'll let it go. I'm not restoring the content, after all, it doesn't make a great difference. But: students' centers are notable in Chile and for their schools. If they aren't where you reside, it's not my problem. Regards, and I'm not responding any further this topic. Küñall (talk) 20:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

If I see you insert your name once more into any Wikipedia article, I will report the matter at WP:ANI, and ask that you be topic-banned and/or blocked. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rebeca Cofré

Hello! Your submission of Rebeca Cofré at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm also confused as to what name she goes by. You've titled the page Rebeca Cofré, but written Rebeca Cofré Calderón in the hook. Yoninah (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Final notification: no edits have been made to the article since your response on December 17. Action is needed; the usual period for work to be completed is one week, and it has already been ten days. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jang Sung-thaek.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jang Sung-thaek.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Jang Sung-thaek.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jang Sung-thaek.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — This, that and the other (talk) 05:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for fixing the image of Gonzalo Inzunza Inzunza to an appropriate size! Happy holidays! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 07:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Glad to have been of help, thanks, and happy holidays for you too! Küñall (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2013 (UTC)