User talk:Vaclaw1990

Copyright issues

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from de:Narew-Offensive to Narew Offensive. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 17:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your edit to Gorlice–Tarnów offensive has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 02:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narew Offensive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bug. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Russian invasion of East Prussia (1914), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tannenberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of bridgehead over the Vistula (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Probably notable, but sourcing and context issues need addressing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of bridgehead over the Vistula and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vaclaw1990! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 15:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Vaclaw1990. Thank you for creating Battle of Łomża. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, can you add trans-title tags into the refs.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 14:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Vaclaw1990. Thank you for creating Riga–Schaulen offensive. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 19:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Łomża, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hude.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Vaclaw1990. Thank you for creating Zolota Lypa – Dniestr battle. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bug–Narew Offensive, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Adamowo and Gnojno.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bug–Narew Offensive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamionka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kaunas Fortress into Siege of Kovno. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:22, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narew Offensive, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Adamowo and Kamionka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vilno-Dvinsk offensive moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vilno-Dvinsk offensive, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaclaw1990: Please see Draft talk:Vilno-Dvinsk offensive § Possible sources & the Draft:Vilno-Dvinsk offensive § Notes section. I was only searching on Vilno & Dvinsk for the possible sources thus far. It is probable that there are other sources under variant spellings. Peaceray (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of bridgehead over the Vistula

Hello, Vaclaw1990. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of bridgehead over the Vistula, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of bridgehead over the Vistula

Hello, Vaclaw1990. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of bridgehead over the Vistula".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rovno offensive moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rovno offensive, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Skh-27av-2se915-rovno.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Skh-27av-2se915-rovno.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Gorlice breakthrough.png

Thanks for uploading File:Gorlice breakthrough.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Russian invasion of East Prussia (1914), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tannenberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Vaclaw1990. Thank you for your work on Second Brusilov offensive. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting information

If you don't like something, then write your claims to the discussion page and prove your words in the discussion, and do not delete information from sources crying that someone is a "Russian forger" Dushnilkin (talk) 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]