User talk:VSOian

Welcome/Socking

Hello, VSOian, welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. With that in mind can you please share what your relationship is to Smita Patil PSP or users, Vinayak Singh Oberoi Official? --VViking_TalkEdits 15:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening Sir!

Sure Sir, Sir, I am using this computer from- a Cyber Cafe, where many people have used this before too. Some of my relatives did use it too. And Smita and Vinayak, are indeed my relatives, my cousin and brother respectively. Is there anything wrong in me editing the Wikipedia Pages Sir? Whatever I have edited on Wikipedia as yet, i have added valid news citations etc Sir. Please let me know, if there's anything wrong. I am well, aware of them getting blocked, the reasons also I am aware about Sir. Personal/Family promotion. I am ashamed for their unethical behaviors that violated- Wikipedia's policies. You and other Wikipedia users can be rest assured, such activities wont take place again in future. You would also not find me- User:VSOian adding/promoting any personal/family members/pages/events/incidents Sir.

Thank You,

Virat Singh Oberoi. VSOian (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Rupanjana Mitra, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geniac (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thank you so much, and sorry for the inconvenience. I shall be citing every edit i make from now on with reliable sources. VSOian (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uma Dhar (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuicoleJR was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uma Dhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QuicoleJR (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VSOian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QuicoleJR (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidency University, Kolkata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidency University. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect and Addition of Information

@Bonadea Good Afternoon Ma'am,

I had a doubt. In this article as father, it is given- 'J.N. Sircar' but it is incorrect I suppose. Nripendra Sircar's father was- Nagendranath Sircar, according to these two sources- Source 1 and Source 2 Please look into the matter and do the needful ma'am. Additionally, I found more information about Nripendra Sircar on the above two sources. May I add them citing the links given above?

Thank You, VSOian (talk) 11:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello VSOian, thank you for your question. First a comment on Who's Who as a source. Wikipedia considers that to be generally unreliable (see this list of sources) because the entries are written by the subjects themselves – on the other hand, this particular claim might be considered OK to source from there because after all, it seems unlikely that he would give the wrong name for his father! I don't have access to Who's Who, but of course I trust you are right about what it says. The other source you provide, Sir N.N. Sircar's Speeches and Pamphlets, seems fine to me, so I think you can change the info about Sircar's father based on that, and then you don't need to refer to Who's Who at all. If you use the book about Sircar's speeches and pamphlet as a source to add more info to the article, do be careful to keep to a neutral tone, though, since the book is written in a rather laudarory manner! --bonadea contributions talk 12:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much ma'am. I have changed the information.

Regards. VSOian (talk) 13:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arindam Ganguly (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arindam Ganguly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 19:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thank you so much. As I am a new editor on Wikipedia, I am still learning 😄 I'll slowly learn more about adding new articles and contributing to Wikipedia.

Thank You! VSOian (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]