Jump to content

User talk:Utopes/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 17

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Request on 16:14:18, 18 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by CantileverGray



CantileverGray (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Request on 13:13:38, 13 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Stoneman519


Hello! I'm reaching out for help with this draft. I think I know what's going wrong, but I just wanted to get some clarification. I'm creating this on behalf of someone, so I just want to make sure I'm coordinating with the correct info.

What I'm reading is that I need to have more than one independent news source to corroborate the authenticity of this project. I just want to make sure that this is the correct interpretation of the rejection, and that it's the only sticking point.

Thanks for your help!

Stoneman519 (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for submitting your draft, by the way. When you first submitted, only one of the sources was usable as a secondary reference. Verifiability is the first point towards having an article, as it's impossible for us to approve a draft if it's not easily verifiably true. So, thank you for adding more sources!
That being said, simply having sources does not equate to a guaranteed acceptance. You ask if sources are the "only sticking point" and the answer to that is no, as the subject still needs to meet the notability guidelines and be written in a neutral point of view. It seems since then, your draft has been reviewed again a couple days ago. The draft looks significantly better and the game journalism you included looks to be quality. As mentioned by User:Qcne though, through nobody's fault as the game hasn't been released yet, there may not be enough significant coverage currently, or at least based off of what was included in the article.
That all being said, thank you for your efforts so far! A good starting point for publishing this draft is being able to include & identify at least three reliable, secondary sources which provide independent coverage. Feel free to reach out on my talk page or on the draft's talk page, and resubmit if you are able to supply these. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Swiss Stem Cell

Hi @Utopes. Im asking for your help to review my article again. It has been declined since 9 September 2023. The article is actually a first task from my boss. I already fix all the mistake. Pelase consider to review it again. Thank you. Ryuaelv1407 (talk) 02:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Draft:DAAily platforms

Hi Utopes. Thanks for reviewing my submission. Could you tell me exactly what needs to be modified, in order for approval to be granted? Many thanks in advance. CantileverGray CantileverGray (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello @CantileverGray:! I had already given a comment on the draftpage itself, in terms of what improvements would be initially recommended. I'm afraid there's no DIRECT modification I can suggest which can make up for a lack of the subject's apparent notability. If the subject has received significant coverage from reliable sources that are secondary and independent of the subject, at the time that the draft is reviewed, it will have a good chance of being accepted.
Helpful links for viewing that I would recommend are this article on maintaining a neutral point of view, and that article detailing the ins and outs of reliable sources. I hope this is helpful to you! Utopes (talk / cont) 18:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, Utopes. Many thanks. The third-party sources that are cited are all independent and credible. This is why I'm a bit confused as to what further can be done. I look forward to your response. Thanks for your time, CantileverGray. CantileverGray (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Well, a few different points to start at are the fact that References 4 & 5 do not seem to mention "daaily platforms" at all, and reference 1 is the website itself. The Organisation section does not contain any inline citations. The remaining sources appear to be press-releases that come from the platform itself.
If you're able to add references to sections without any (such as the Organisation section), and/or find further references that could replace #1, 4, and potentially 5, feel free to resubmit the draft. You can ask for further assistance at the Wikipedia teahouse. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Many thanks, @Utopes. I appreciate your effort to help me. I've replaced citations 1 and 4, double-checked that 5 isn't a press-release (it's a credible industry news outlet) and shorted the Organisation section, while adding a supporting citation. I hope this meets with your approval. Look forward to your response. Many thanks, CantileverGray. CantileverGray (talk) 11:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Utopes,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Translator redirects

Generally in a case such as you bring up, if the translator's calls end up being used for translating another station (which is very likely), then the redirect will move to the station where the calls are in use. There really isn't a set policy about translator calls since outside a few HD-to-analog FM translators that do originate original content, the vast majority translate the main signal of an AM or FM station. As there are no incoming links at all for W215AQ, I would have no objection to a deletion at all since the transition has been completed in full. Nate • (chatter) 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

@MrSchimpf: I see, thank you for the response! I think I'll go ahead and tag the redirect in question from the user talk discussion from earlier, if you'd like. Alternatively, since you're the creator of the W215AQ page by way of the move, I think you should be able to request CSD under G7 there. Although, I'm not sure if the act of page moving introduces technicalities on that end. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Request on 16:25:46, 9 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Faezeh Shahrabi


Hi Utopes, Thank you for your kind review.

I used other taekwondo players' Wikipedia pages as templates e.g. Nahid Kiani, Marjan Salahshouri and Sara Khoshjamal Fekri. They are almost the same as my article. As they are young champions there is not much referenceable information about them on the internet.

I'd appreciate it if you guide me on the extra information you are looking for or suggest some templates.

Thanks

Faezeh Shahrabi (talk) 16:25, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Botanical & Zoological Garden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Botanical & Zoological Garden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botanical & Zoological Garden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Plantdrew (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

@Plantdrew: I didn't create this page; I'm probably not who you want to be communicating this to. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Resubmission

Thank you for your suggestion and comments for https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Kara_Jorga initial submission . I have improved coverage of this topic in media and academic research. I have also edited grammar mistakes and misspellings. Aidos.taibekuly (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you @Aidos.taibekuly:! I'll take another look at the draft and keep you updated. Cheers, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Resubmission

Hello UTOPES.

Major improvements have been made at Draft:Blandaren. Please consider taking another look at it.

Kind regards,

Fiskpinnar1337 Fiskpinnar1337 (talk) 13:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Dropping a single source tag on a newly created article instead of doing a simple web search to find a second source (of which there are several). RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 09:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

@RadioactiveBoulevardier not a good reason to trout someone. A relevant maintenance tag was added and the original article creator should have added more than a single source to begin with. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
You're right lol, I was being grouchy because it happened within an hour of publication.
The rationale behind publishing it as a single-source stub is that it's easier to crowdsource expansion than incubate in userspace or draftspace since it's a currently relevant topic. That's been my experience so far creating Russo-Ukrainian War articles. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 23:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
@RadioactiveBoulevardier: It was actually after 2 hours from the page's creation, which I checked after the trout was sent. I didn't comment on the trouting because the ordeal looked over-and-done, based on the conversation on your talk page. The page was created at 3:24 with [1], whereas I added the tag at 5:49 at [2]. I'm all for trouts being sent as a good-natured update if a mistake is made, but in this case 60 minutes is the NPP-suggested time to wait before tagging (which shows up red for reviewers so that sub-hour tags shouldn't happen), and in this case your final edit on the page was 3:28, with no indication that you were going to add a second sentence (much less a second source). While there may have been easily accessible sources out there on the Internet, the one sentence present didn't assert the subject was notable to begin with (as it just claimed the artillery existed, and I'm no artillery guru). From my point of view, draftification was absolutely the right avenue for that page, but because it was still made that same day, I felt a tag was more than plenty in case you did come back to the article later. Just my two cents; I wanted to add this bit as the trout may have been a misunderstanding in regards to the within-an-hour tag, as it definitely wasn't that. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Mathematical Growth

Thank you for reviewing my submission. I have tried to address all of our concerns. Again, I am aiming this article at non-mathematicians, to help connect everyday observations of growth with the proper terminology, so I chose (and do not have the expertise) not to include more technical information about the topic. I hope the numerous links to other Wikipedia articles will satisfy all of those needs. I am trying to provide an overview and guideposts for readers to find the appropriate detailed information, if desired.

I included two references for the last section, Determining type of growth, which I failed to do earlier. I also added two sentences, one to this section and one to the first paragraph, on the suggestion of D.Lazard. I paraphrased the applicable statements from each article, and of course linked my sentences to those articles. Is that enough for reference? I do not have access to original sources for those topics. I also removed the inappropriate section on Recursive growth, thanks to D.Lazard.

I plan to do research for further references beyond my personal library at the University of Wisconsin. I also need to improve some of the images I used.

Please let me know if these changes have helped the article. Thank you. Pbergerd (talk) 16:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Nickel azide

Could you please double-check that new article? The formula (CuN3) and nickel ionic nature (dinickel monocation) are not correct. DMacks (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

@DMacks: Thanks for letting me know! That was definitely an error; I had borrowed a page skeleton when I was putting the page together (mainly for tuning the chembox template), but did not catch that that part. I have gone back and updated the lead based on the associated zhwiki page, so please take a look to see if I addressed everything! (As a heads-up, I had planned on creating a few more of these for azides with quality coverage, namely for Cr, Mn, Co, and Hg as the ones that are left. These should crop up over the next couple days if everything goes right.) Utopes (talk / cont) 20:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Ni(N3)2 looks good now. Thanks for all your work on these. I've worked with a few of the more-stable or gas-phase/matrix-isolated among the M(N3)x but not in many years. DMacks (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Utopes:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

Unnecessarily complicated Gears Award

This award is given to Utopes for collecting more than 150 points per week in the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for your continuous contributions to the drive! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award

The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This award is given to Utopes for collecting more than 500 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Most redirects award

Redirect Ninja Award
Hi Utopes!

Thank you so much for contributing to the New pages patrol backlog drive. You reviewed an astounding 4,684 redirects. That’s more than any other person could do, and it’s safe to say you impressed us all with your dedication to the project. Your reviews were not just plentiful, but they were accurate, efficient, and well reasoned. This drive would not have been near as successful without your reviews and helpful advice provided via Discord. I am honored to award you the redirect ninja award for your outstanding job this month. Congratulations and happy editing! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 13:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


WikiCup 2023 November newsletter

The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, Delaware BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

  • Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
  • England Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
  • Delaware BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
  • Berkelland LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
  • Ukraine Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Review new article David Le Vita

Hello Utopes May I ask whether you could give me some more specific resons for the refusal? Thanks in advance and all best Schedukiam Schedukiam (talk) 14:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Siege Of Inegol

Hello, you declined my article based on the fact that the sources didn't change despite the previous reviewer's comments. However as stated by the reviewer there was no problem with the source itself, it was just the way I added them in the article, which I fixed. I see no reason as to why there would be a problem now Salman Cooper Mapping (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Can you help me

I need help to complete my article Ultra8T (talk) 14:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message (test)

(This is a test message. You are getting this, because you are either a coordinator or an electoral commissioner for the Arbitration Committee Elections.)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Civility Barnstar
Thank you for being so kind to me when you didn't agree with an AfC article I had accepted :) Genuinely probably the nicest ways I've been called out on anything on Wikipedia. -- NotCharizard 🗨 07:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much! Now my 10,000th edit actually has some significance and isn't some random gnomish vandalism warning xD Utopes (talk / cont) 08:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

Technical news

  • Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Utopes. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

RfD and the WP:SNOW clause

I'm not going to revert your revert, but I do think keeping the discussion open longer will be a needless waste of editor time that could be better spent elsewhere. Cremastra (talk) 22:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

While you're probably right that the discussion will result in a keep verdict, the decision to close it before the discussion even turned 12 hours old was premature. It was a nom created in good faith, but who was not given the time of day to withdraw if they wanted, or respond to any of the keep voters if they so choose. RfD is not a head count, and 40% of the keeps were "weak keeps" at that. At the end of the day, how editors spend their time is up them, but if the nominator has any words they'd like to add there, that is permitted. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
@Cremastra: If you want to close that discussion, I see the one above has also been closed as a snow-keep so the one in question could probably end up in the same boat. I will say, I was quite surprised to see what seemed to be a new person relisting and closing discussions on their first day at RfD, hence my apprehension around that discussion closing early despite the 5 keep votes. It'll probably have a snowball's chance of getting deleted, so it was likely correct in spirit. I trust your judgement, so if you think its closure-as-keep is the right call, that works for me too. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utopes/Archive_13&oldid=1212663687"