Jump to content

User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Archive
Typhoon2013's Archives

Barnstars
2013 // 2014 // 2015 // 2016 // 2017
2018 // 2019 // 2020 // 2021 // 2022

This is the 2nd Archive of Typhoon2013's talk page. Archive 2 includes messages during 2014.

Proposed deletion of Timeline of the 2014 Pacific typhoon season

The article Timeline of the 2014 Pacific typhoon season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is premature and consists of original research and what appears to be guess work, with no references. If articles such as this, timelines of natural disasters and weather events, are common, this can be properly recreated later in the year, with sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. freshacconci talk to me 21:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

2014 PTS timeline

There is no need for there to be a timeline of the 2014 PTS yet, as things stand certain users dont like the seasons having timelines yet alone when theres nothing to put in them. If the season deserves a timeline like the 2013 does then we can recreate it later.Jason Rees (talk) 00:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

IRC

Hey there. Could you stop making such short articles that are essentially copies of the season article? If you want to make a sub-article, then there needs to be more information. That was the case for 2013 Pacific typhoon season. You made a bunch of articles, and most of them are still in the same short stubby state as when you first created them. I can help you make them better, but you gotta meet us halfway and put some more effort into them.

I should add, there are a bunch of editors that regularly frequent an online chatroom called Internet Relay Chat. I'm on there, so is Yellow Evan, TheAustinMan, JasonRees, etc. We could help you get your articles off the ground and help you in general as an editor.

Here is the link - Internet Relay Chat - you just enter your user name, put #wiki-hurricanes as the channel, and then enter what you see for the "captcha". If you need any help, let me know, I'd love to have you become more involved in the project! :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey! Sorry I missed you on IRC. I was having lunch then, but I'm glad you found the channel alright :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

IRC

Hey there. Could you stop making such short articles that are essentially copies of the season article? If you want to make a sub-article, then there needs to be more information. That was the case for 2013 Pacific typhoon season. You made a bunch of articles, and most of them are still in the same short stubby state as when you first created them. I can help you make them better, but you gotta meet us halfway and put some more effort into them.

I should add, there are a bunch of editors that regularly frequent an online chatroom called Internet Relay Chat. I'm on there, so is Yellow Evan, TheAustinMan, JasonRees, etc. We could help you get your articles off the ground and help you in general as an editor.

Here is the link - Internet Relay Chat - you just enter your user name, put #wiki-hurricanes as the channel, and then enter what you see for the "captcha". If you need any help, let me know, I'd love to have you become more involved in the project! :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey! Sorry I missed you on IRC. I was having lunch then, but I'm glad you found the channel alright :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Hopefully you had no problems with Cyclone Lusi! We're all on IRC right now if you want to join :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of companion plants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beneficial insects, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marigold and Nasturtium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 7 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Start/End Date templates

Please avoid removing these when you tweak dates, they need to be there for some reason im not clear on.Jason Rees (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoon Aere (2004) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Infobox Hurricane
  • Dissipated=August 27, 2004 <br><small>{weakened at depression strength during August 26 to 31, 2004)</br></small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Storm dates

Please stop adding original research to articles. All of the recent reverts I made were to articles in which your changes are not supported by the NHC reports. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 Pacific typhoon season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mph
Cyclone Wilma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tropical Storm Wilma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Typhoon Sanba (disambiguation)

Hello Typhoon2013,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Typhoon Sanba (disambiguation) for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anastasia (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Year articles

See WT:YEARS, but I do not believe "Easter Monday" is a significant holiday, and Holy Week is marginal. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Yeah. Easter Monday is more of a Canadian holiday, and even without that, it is already a minor holiday. LightandDark2000 (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
OK, then. It is just because its my first time in the Project of Years. Oh and just a tip, it is not just a Canadian holiday, its also here in New Zealand, British and Australia maybe. Typhoon2013 (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Remnants of Gillian

Hello, LightandDark2000. A couple of days ago, I just thought that the remnants or the remnant energy of Cyclone Gillian became Cyclone Ivanoe. What do you think? Typhoon2013 (talk) 20:34, 17 April 2014‎ (UTC)

It's possible, but highly unlikely, due to the time span between the 2 storms (6 days), and the lack of references to Gillian in any of Ivanoe's advisories. Unless you find an official source that confirms this, it shouldn't be added to the article. Best regards, LightandDark2000 (talk) 09:07, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh, and please remember to sign your post by by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your posts. Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Things to consider

There is no real need to expand out the information on Hadi's life within the SPAC page, with things that happened while it was out of the basin. Also please note that the JTWC called Hadi a tropical storm, so you shouldnt be doing so.Jason Rees (talk) 22:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

]== Removing AfD template ==

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Typhoon Yolanda (disambiguation) concerning this edit. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. It is not a good idea to simply remove notices added with {{Article for deletion}} templates without ever commenting on the related page. You may in fact have an excellent reason to contest this deletion, but it is essential that you voice this reason. Thank you. Dustin (talk) 21:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

TC's

Hi Typhoon2013, I saw your message to both Hurricanehink and LightandDark2000, which asked if we should add in a system from 2005 to the WPAC page. The answer too which is yes - it should be added. However i have too point out to you that "Typhoon 2000" is not PAGASA's wesbite, it is just a reliable source which we can use for various things. If you ever spot a tropical cyclone missing again and have a reliable source, just be bold and add it in.Jason Rees (talk) 01:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Yep, what Jason Rees said. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2005 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bicol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

PAGASA Tropical Depression 'Michael' of 2005

Hello, LightandDark2000. I found out in the PAGASA's Typhoon2000 log (website: http://www.typhoon2000.ph/season05-3.htm) that there is a storm between Typhoon Kiko and Labuyo (Typhoons Khanun and Damrey). Do you thin we should add this? Please rely :) Typhoon2013 08:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

By all means, Go for it! Just remember to cite your source. LightandDark2000 (talk) 07:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
I just added a section for Tropical Depression Michael to the 2005 Pacific typhoon season article. Feel free to add to it, as it is nearly empty. LightandDark2000 (talk) 09:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Oh, thanks. Just one more question about this storm, did JMA classified it as a tropical depression too? Typhoon2013 (talk) 09:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Ive had to remove this system as when i investigated it further, it turns out that it is only classified by the webmaster himself and not any of the agencies as far as i am aware.Jason Rees (talk) 12:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Then why is it even on the website at all?? LightandDark2000 (talk) 02:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2005 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of the 2011 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • tracker/tropical-storm-14w-nanmadol-1-1.153051}|publisher=Dave Ornauer|accessdate=August 23, 2011}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of the 2011 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of the 2012 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *0600 UTC&nbsp;- JMA names it as Tropical Storm Guchol as it starts its [[rapid deepening] phase.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


Timelines

I dont think you should set a date but rather wait and see what happens when it happens.Jason Rees (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Not yet - Wait until at least this pause in activity is over.Jason Rees (talk) 14:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the 2012 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guandong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Mitag

The JTWC were the ones to declare the system as sub-tropical. We as users cannot declare what a system is since that would constitute as original research. When in doubt use JMA data :) Supportstorm (talk) 04:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 Pacific typhoon season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Guandong
Timeline of the 2014 Pacific typhoon season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chuuk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

re: 2002 PTS

Ah ok, you're right about Rammasun, but I hope you understand why I reverted the rest of your edits. There's no need for a section on every tropical depression (JTWC or otherwise), unless they actually did something notable (like causing a lot of damage). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Please be aware of something

Information for typhoon-related articles should be based on JMA first, including life span, pressure, etc.. A storm’s main picture should be during or nearing its peak intensity, and a TD picture should not be used for an officially named storm. -- Meow 06:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Timeline entries

Please write timeline entries out correctly, properly, add sources and correct times in UTC, without including bias words such as finally weakens.Jason Rees (talk) 12:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 20 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tropical Storm Hagibis (2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of the 2014 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • nbsp;- Tropical Storm Hagibis finally weakens as it makes landfall over southern [[China]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-06/15/content_17588650.htm|accessdate=June 15,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1940–49 Pacific typhoon seasons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{main|1940 Pacific typhoon season}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tropical Storm Hagibis (2014) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[2009 Pacific typhoon season#Typhoon Molave (Isang)|Typhoon Molave (2009]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoon Chataan (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Typhoon Chataan|Typhoon Chataan (2002]] (T0206, 08W, Gloria) - deadliest storm in [[Chuuk State|Chuuk]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Track maps with low quality

I am glad that you contribute to track maps of tropical cyclones, but what you submitted are all with low quality. Please tell me how you create these maps so I can find out the answer. -- Meow 18:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Warnings.

Hi,

I've noticed a couple of your edit summaries have included statements that may cause peole to think that you have administraor priviliges. For example [1] and [2]. It might be worth using warning templates on user pages that there are issues with rather than including this in edit summaries these can be found here. This will allow other users to see if they have been warned for similar behaviour before as well as preventing people from accusing you of trying to impersonate an administrator (it doesnt appear you are but it may be misinterpreted as such). Amortias (T)(C) 21:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: 60W

At best, I think it should get a small mention in an "other storms" section, which should also hold every system that was not a named storm, IMO. That includes the "September Tropical Storm", which wasn't officially a storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Yep, exactly! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Relative sizes of Haiyan and Katrina with the US.jpg

Thank you for uploading the image, but it is not from the official source. I tried to update your file, yet it was in vain because of different formats. Thus, I have uploaded another file Comparison between Haiyan and Katrina.png which is directly from CIMSS. -- Meow 10:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 7 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

re: 1993

No problem about the questions! So, you have to find links online and in text in order to cite them. PAGASA naming isn't the best... we don't really know every single named storm, as most sources usually use the international name (which at that time was by JTWC). It's not listed here, which is a list of the damaging Philippine systems, so I'm not really sure. Sorry. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Jebi

Please stop messing around with the date Severe Tropical Storm Jebi formed, we go with when the JMA declares a tropical depression in best track. The IP that you were warring with stopped putting the 26th in after i had linked to the BT in my edit summary, however, you keep changing it to the 30th.Jason Rees (talk) 12:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

The Neoguri picture

07-07 00Z JMA: 95kt JTWC: 135kt

07-07 06Z JMA: 95kt JTWC: 135kt

Neoguri 2014-07-07 0455Z.jpg is the only picture which is not only within Neoguri’s peak intensity period and but with better quality. Please do not replace it with another picture or say it is after peak intensity anymore. -- Meow 10:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Reasoning for Special:Diff/616417576

Could you please elaborate? Why should the header say "Tropical Depression 09W" but the infobox just say "09W"? I just isn't consistent despite being of low importance. Thank you for responding. Dustin (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey, not to seem like I am stalking you or something, but I notice that you have been editing and whatnot without responding. Could you just give me some sort of reason? Please? Thank you. Dustin (talk) 20:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Same reason as this.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hmm... I guess it is different with hurricanes (Atl, CPac, EPac) compared to typhoons (WPac)? Dustin (talk) 23:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Okay, well, thanks for giving an explanation! Dustin (talk) 00:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
This is a really unimportant issue that isn't really worth pinging you about, but on my edit summary, the mistake on your username was caused by my software. I didn't catch the mistake the second time either. That is the last you will hear from me regarding this issue. Dustin (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1964 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bicol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

File:01C Jul 17 2014 1950Z.jpg

I just thought I should notify you, see the page File:01C Jul 17 2014 1950Z.jpg to see the change. Dustin (talk) 00:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@User:Dustin V. S.. Oh, I should not have left that message because I already found a source. But, thanks for some notes.Typhoon2013 (talk) 01:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Infobox_typhoon_current

Just as FYI, I've recently completed a merge of the "current" templates into the main one, which now has options to allow tracking of active storms. Going to revert your revert, since the old syntax is now gone. -- Netoholic @ 03:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I have already reverted Typhoon2013's revert. With the templates having been merged, the old syntax is gone. Dustin (talk) 03:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
@Netoholic, I think you should fix the new template/infobox again. Something is currently wrong. I was just updating both templates of Rammasun and Matmo from JMA's advisory but it appears out when I clicked save it dramatically changed. Could you fix this immediately please. Typhoon2013 (talk) 01:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I can't do anything as long as User:United_States_Man keeps reverting the changes. I suggest asking him to stop and to use the new documentation I provided for how to use Template:Infobox hurricane on active storms. -- Netoholic @ 02:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
No. Myself and others feel that this is doing more bad than good. You are welcome to join the discussion at the project talk page. United States Man (talk) 02:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
@Netoholic. Oh, it is OK. I think User:Yellow Evan is fixing it up. But if the template still doesn't work for me and User:Meow, I thin there is going to be a big problem to the new infobox template. Typhoon2013 (talk) 02:26 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Typhoon2013, United States Man reverted all my changes, so you're currently left only with the old templates. I literally can't do anything to help until he let's me restore my update to Template:Infobox hurricane. -- Netoholic @ 03:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
@Netoholic, @Dustin. I think the issue of the new infobox is finished. I have already put back the old one. Netoholic, next time if you are going to make a new infobox/template, tell the users or else we would have another of this again. Please do not worry about these issues already, just continue to fix and update tropical cyclones. :) Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Season Track Summary

Thanks for you messages about Mitag. The problem is that the season summary maps have always used the US 1-minute wind data, using the NRL running tracks as operational data and the JTWC database for post-season analysis. Despite your opinions of me, I wasn't involved when the West Pacific tracks were first generated (around 2006), but no doubt the intention was to keep the track maps for different basins compatible (Atlantic tracks seen to have been done first and could only use 1-minute winds), and to make use of the longest running database then available (i.e. JTWC). Cyclonebiskit's update to Mitag uses JMA 10-minute data, unlike any other map on this page, and while the colors may not be any different in this case I don't want to start a precedent by bringing this data onto the season summary map.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 08:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

TD and dissipation

A tropical depression is considered as an active tropical cyclone in Wikipedia. JMA only downgraded Rammasun to a TD, so it is still active. Once it degenerated to a LPA or disappeared according to JMA’s high seas report, it officially dissipates. -- Meow 02:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

When people did this last year they were quickly reverted.Jason Rees (talk) 02:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
When you say "this", who are you referring to? Dustin (talk) 02:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

East Pacific Seasonal Track Maps

Hi,

From what I recall (it's been a while :P), the issue with Peke's track was that it cut off at the International Date Line as the EPac dataset for Peke did not extend into its West Pacific phase. I'll fire up the track map generator and see if I can get a better quality track for 1987 (your version is a bit blurry) as well as update 1990 and 1991 with the modern color scheme.

Have a nice day! — Iune(talk) 03:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Matmo (2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2002 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2002 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

1976 Canary Island UFO Article on AFD

Please join the discussion about the fate of this article.98.174.223.41 (talk) 20:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Southwest China floods, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Guandong Province and Guandong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 3 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 7 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:43, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 14 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |Prewinds=<
  • {{cn span|text=On July 26, JMA monitors a [[low-pressure area]] near [[Chuuk State|Chuuk]]. The

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |distance_from=About 1,305 mi (2,105 km) WSW of [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]]<br>About 495 mi 800 km) SW of [[Johnston Atoll|Johnston Island]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of the 2003 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • issued its first warning on Kujira, giving the local storm name Amang.<ref name=GP />|group=nb}}<ref name=GP />

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1994 North Indian Ocean cyclone season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Weather channel names

I have gone and removed your edits per multiple discussions about the matter, The weather channel uses their winter storm names to promote their channel, as their revenue comes from viewers. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 11:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

2003 PTS

Hey there. I hope you don't mind, but I reverted your edit to the 2003 PTS article. There is no need for minor short-lived depressions to get full sections. They make the article unnecessarily long and don't add anything other than an unneeded infobox. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Yea, in general, the PAGASA depressions probably don't need their own section. Granted, some, like Winnie 04, would warrant one due to their impact. But most are short-lived, weak, and not that damaging, so those ones definitely don't need their own section. It just adds unnecessary space to the article. Hope you understand :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop creating another JTWC track map

There is already JTWC wp1514.gif, why did you create another file? What you did is only confusing people and causing troubles. Please update to the first file. By the way, your file name is really a mistake. -- Meow 20:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@Meow:, Oh sorry. I didn't know. The question is that why didn't they put it there in the 2014 article after they uploaded it? User:Typhoon2013 03:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Kalmaegi

You created the article too early that it may be merged by someone very soon unless you provide more important contents. Besides, it is not a typhoon so the title is currently wrong. -- Meow 04:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

@Meow:. I know and I am sorry that I will never do it again. Just saying just unlock it () for the moment. I already replied a message to Dustin, about this. -Typhoon2013 04:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 Pacific typhoon season
added a link pointing to Mph
Typhoon Kalmaegi (2014)
added a link pointing to Mph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |distance_from=About 25 mi (40 km) SSW of [Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur|Santa Rosalia]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoon Kalmaegi (2014) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Joel Locsin}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Bagyo Luis / Developing Kalmagi Moving towards Luzon (Friday AM Update |url=http://www.westernpacificweather.com/2014/09/11/bagyo-luis-developing-kalmagi-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Fung-Wong

Hi! sige paki create ng main article si Mario kasi ilalagay ko yung impact. paki notify lang ako. hahaha. salamat xD (Jpuligan 12 (talk) 08:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC))

@Jpuligan 12:: Malapit na ako. I ready mo na. I am living in New Zealand right now so I get info from the internet. Just saying, I am ypung here in Wikipedia so I am trying my best to becoming an admin. -Typhoon2013 08:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
haha alright. yung rainfall amount at tally of deaths ipopost ko mamayang gabi. manonood pa ko news eh at yung sources kasi. haha Jpuligan 12 (talk) 08:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
@Jpuligan 12: Ok, ikaw na bahala dito. Time is different here and I am going to watch movies :P. Please do not vandalize the page and I trust you. I hope we could chat some time in the weekend or next week :). Great to meet you. -Typhoon2013 08:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
nako po. tulungan mo rin ako pag may oras ka hahaha ((: oo di ko ivavandalize yan. sanay na ko dito xD may twitter ka? follow kita haha. nice to meet you rin xD Jpuligan 12 (talk) 09:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
@Jpuligan 12: Aldre Rosario and twitter ko. Meron ako rin facebook. -Typhoon2013 23:30, 19 September 2014
Done followed you already (: @imjohngonzales is my twitter :) tweet ka na lang para ma add kita fb hahahah Jpuligan 12 (talk) 11:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

(UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia

Hey there! Congrats on being around almost an entire year.

  • First, I notice you update your user page a lot. Maybe it's just this month, but that definitely doesn't need to be a big of a focus. Also, I noticed - "You are free to look at it but not to edit it, of course." That isn't actually correct. Your user page is a Wikipedia page, which is still bound to the rules of the website, meaning others could edit if they wanted (For example, if they saw a typo, or one of the user boxes got deleted). That's kind of calling people out to edit your page, when it's not really necessary :P People understand that user pages are primarily done by you and shouldn't be edited unless for good reason.
  • Second, I notice you're starting to dabble with making more articles. That's great! However, if you want to be a better user, you should work on expanding them more, so they're more in line with existing good articles in whatever basin you work in. For example, the Kalmaegi article you started would probably not have been merged if you had a good two paragraphs of information for impact, and an expanded meteorological history. It doesn't do any good for Wikipedia if you simply split off the information from the season article, as Wikipedia just has two copies of the same information without anything additional. Try doing more research through Google and Google News. You'll be surprised how much you can add!
  • Third, the main reason no one is editing 2014 PTS articles is that this is a record season for the eastern Pacific, so there is a lot of attention on those articles. However, that is the case for most years, as generally the Atlantic gets more attention during the year since it's closer to home for many users.
  • Fourth, I think it's way too early to think about adminship. The biggest thing for that is that you need to take drive and become a leader. You need to be able to take care of situations and find problems where some might not know they exist.
  • Regarding the button bar, there's no right or wrong answer. If there was only one more storm in this PTS, for example, then it would be silly to have three lines. But if there is enough for three lines, then make them all even.
  • Lastly, this is just my opinion, but it'd be great if you became the go to user for the PTS. Right now, we have certain users who focus more on some basins than others (for example, I do a lot of work in the south-west Indian, Jason Rees usually works in the South Pacific). We have a large number of stubby or poorly done articles in the western Pacific. That would help the project the most, if you were helping to get the articles to GA in the basin. No pressure, but that would be a really great help :)

Feel free to reply here. I have your talk page watched. Take care. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:38, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, for not replying @Hurricanehink: since I have a project to do at school, editing information about Kalmaegi and waiting for PAGASA to name the new storm (which already is now). Thank you for this information and I will try to do this. Just saying that my school term ends next week so I can be in Wikipedia and talk pages in a lot of time from September 28 to October 12. I will try to chat to you tomorrow in the Wiki relay chat at 04utc if possible. Typhoon2013 23:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
No prob! As for Fung-Wong, yea, it's appropriate for almost any landfalling storm in a populated area to get an article. Good job adding info to it already. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey there! First, I don't think you should be advertising your age on your user page, but that's not why you messaged me :P If you can prove that the 8 deaths are unrelated to the other 4 deaths, then yes, the total should be 12. Ideally, you should find a source saying there were 12 deaths overall. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Yep, as long as you have a source that explicitly says the storm caused the deaths, then it can be added. Nice find, ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Userpage

Hi Typhoon2013, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

JTWC wp1714.gif

If you cannot upload the original track map from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center website or the FMNOC, you should not update. -- Meow 11:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Pacific typhoon season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Land Depression discussion

Hi, this is Rishabh. I have created a discussion where your views will be greatly appreciated, regarding whether Land Depressions should be considered as "other storms" from now on. Please have a look at the discussion where I've explained everything. Located here. Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 03:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

JTWC wp1914.gif

Please stop updating the file in the English Wikipedia. It will be deleted very soon. -- Meow 13:23, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@Meow: It's just a mistake since the guy who made that is wrong that there is another one, which you created. I am just trying to help here and being kind to users. -Typhoon2013 04:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi!

I was that random unregistered user that added info to Tropical Storm Vongfong. I created an account now. :D I love severe weather and hurricanes. Anyway, thanks for redoing it to have it done correctly, I tried to do it the best I could, since an empty space was kind of annoying, lol. However, mind updating Phanfone's "story", too. I'm pretty sure it underwent an eyewall replacement cycle, which would make sense as to why it momentarily weakened. If you know of any sources that say this, then please add it, otherwise maybe just say that it weakened slightly or such. Wow, that's an amazing looking storm, though! HurricaneRaindrop57 (talk) 04:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Reply to invitation: I'm not planning on being on all that much, but I'll accept. I'll probably just come on occasionally when there's a good hurricane/typhoon that seems like it will hit something. :P And thanks for the sources! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HurricaneRaindrop57 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Rethoughts, I've decided not to continue editing, but for certain reasons.

So, I've rethought things, and I've decided that although I love hurricanes and such, I also don't want to miss out on real life. Although that was a great chat and all, I'll likely not continue editing, as the last time I did this I got addicted. So even though I'd love to be part of contributing, I have too much to lose. I'm sorry, but I don't want to miss out on real life, where I really should be, perhaps even eventually really seeing the storms from inside. Thanks for adding the info though. I guess I just wanted to try editing here, and although it might be a fun hobby, it would mess up my life on the outside. You can remove my name from the list too. It's a yes or no choice, to keep editing or not, and I've decided no. Thank you for the invite for the cyclone project, but you can remove my name now. I just hope you understand that I'm not trying to be a troll or anything, I just don't want to get absorbed, and end up being defined by one word: "Average". And I've also figured out one thing - hurricanes, to experience them, need to be seen for real. Sorry if you already do that, not really a tip then. But, if you don't already, maybe you could eventually study hurricanes in real life! :) Goodbye, HurricaneRaindrop57 (talk) 05:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding.

Thank you for understanding. And thank you for being so helpful on here! Instead of just undoing my edit and leaving it, you corrected it. And also, thank you for being so helpful and kind! Have a good time, weather it be editing or anywhere. (Pun intended!) Saying goodbye, HurricaneRaindrop57 (talk) 05:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Stop providing misleading time on the current typhoon information box

You should not use future time anymore. Please read this or I have to report. -- Meow 09:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Sourcing

You should not be using either Western Pacific Weather or Nasa for details about any Pacific typhoons, as they are not reliable enough nor are they official. What you should be doing is using the JTWC Prognostic Reasoning's, Significant tropical weather advisories, in addition to the JMA advisories, these are available on their websites and archived on the talk page. Do not let me catch you using NASA or Western Pacific Weather again to try and source meterological details.Jason Rees (talk) 11:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

It has been me who has been cleaning it up and adding in the CMA stuff based on the BT and i strongly feel that it is fine to stay. As are the pagasa names Jason Rees (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

IRC

Hey there! Don't forget to come on IRC every now and then :) Here is a link, in case you lost it. The channel is #wiki-hurricanes. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

What is your view of arts?

In this image, Vongfong 2014-10-08 0215Z.jpg, you replaced the original with an asymmetric picture. How can you say it is more better? In arts, it is not attractive at all. -- Meow 07:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

@Meow: I thought that the image was a little bit small. I tried it in the normal infobox. So that's why I stretched it out a bit. - Typhoon2013 07:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
@Typhoon2013: Well, in this case, the picture has contained enough contents, as it includes Vongfong’s main circulation completely and still has some spaces. Anyway, that is the limit of MODIS. -- Meow 07:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
@Meow: Ok, then. Do you want to chat tomorrow in the Internet Relay Chat because I don't want to leave too many messages on your talk page, hehe. If it is OK for you. - Typhoon2013 07:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
@Typhoon2013: I may have a meeting tomorrow. I have already postponed it due to Typhoon Vongfong. -- Meow 07:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
@Meow: I am available on Thursday and Friday. Also I am still up until midnight (NZT) because I am going to sight-see the eclipse. I am available on these times if you need me or leave a message about something. - Typhoon2013 07:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Cyclone Hudhud

I see you reverted my edits on Hudhud. But why don't we need the template for the North Indian Ocean Storms? We do that for all other northern hemisphere basin (I don't know about southern hemisphere, because I haven't experienced tracking them yet) but not for the Indian Ocean. May I know why? Besides, the template also works for Indian Ocean. So I do not know why we don't put templates on Indian Ocean storms. Please clarify. Damien4794 (talk) 00:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: anon

Hey there. I'm not really sure what to do. It looks like a lot of the edits are legit. Instead of warning about blocking, why not try asking that IP address to create an account and work with him/her? You catch more flies with honey, not vinegar :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Try this new approach of being nice to the anon, see if that changes anything. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring

Dude, I know you have administrator ambitions, but you really can't become one if you can't learn to use the talk page of an article. If three separate people revert you, then chances are you might be in the wrong. I'm not sure why you're so obsessed with this storm, but you can't let obsession drive your editing habits. I opened up a discussion on the talk page, which is what you should do in the future in cases of dispute. You shouldn't use edit summaries to explain your changes, and it shouldn't be split over multiple user talk pages. Always use the article talk page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

To be completed...

I think this covered by my previous response at User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive2#Season Track Summary.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:12, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

The "NASA prediction"

This fake prediction has already been thoroughly debunked in 2012 when it originally appeared (with the date 2012-12-21 known for another public hysteria event), no need to proliferate silly hoaxes in an encyclopedia. You can read more about it here. — Yerpo Eh? 09:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: Do we still need it?

It's needed for visually impaired people in case they cannot see the colors properly. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 18 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

04F Image

Just saw your recent edit. The image is actually of 03F. 04F is further southeast.

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

As of is not analysis time

As of for a tropical cyclone means when it presents the intensity and location, not an agency analyses the system. I have mentioned this many times, and I do not want to remind you anymore. Do not let me see this happen from you. -- Meow 03:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Typhoon2013/Archive2&oldid=1090611552"