User talk:Transient-understanding
Welcome
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Transient-understanding, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Transient-understanding! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC) |
The Enterprise Channel
[edit]Hi! Your article on The Enterprise Channel is not ready for inclusion in Wikipedia since it lacks references, categories, incoming links, outgoing links. I have therefore moved it to Draft:The Enterprise Channel where you can continue developing it without fear of it being deleted. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
BBC Living moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, BBC Living, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: BBC Living has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Bilorv (talk) 20:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Patricia Resick moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Patricia Resick, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Resick has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MurielMary (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Posttraumatic stress disorder into Treatments for PTSD. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Fair enough. I will do that in future.Transient-understanding (talk) 23:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walkabout (magazine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dick Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Enterprise Channel
[edit]
Hello, Transient-understanding. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Enterprise Channel".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Transient-understanding, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Medicare (Australia) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soldier settlement (Australia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Renmark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BoJack Horseman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMAX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State Library Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scienceworks.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Murray River distances, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gol Gol.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 17:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Edit summaries
[edit]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking notice and caring about at least one page I do :-) I used to leave a lot more summaries before I started using the Visual Editor. It's lack of summary-including save-and-keep-editing button makes it more difficult, as well as causing more edit conflicts. I don't tend to read other people's edit comments much myself - I find the compare tool far more useful for determining what's changed - but I understand your process is different to mine. I will add summaries to my edits to the Half-Caste Act in future.Transient-understanding (talk) 04:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- No worries, and thanks. I have come across your edits before, although not often. I scroll through my emailed notifications on my tablet in the mornings, and unless the editor is one I am very familiar with, tend to click on those without edit summaries to check the changes, which is all rather slow and laborious on the tablet. I didn't realise that Visual Editor made it so difficult to add summaries. Not a biggie, and now at least I am more likely to remember your name! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
– robertsky (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sick leave into Health care in Australia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Fair enough. 02:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBC Kids until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Modernponderer (talk) 01:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of autism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emotional disturbance.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on History of autism
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of autism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on History of autism
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of autism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Neurosis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Neurosis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Psychological resilience
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Psychological resilience, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia (third request)
[edit]You have multiple times been advised on your talk page about the importance of understanding copyright (2020), including two requests about WP:CWW from Diannaa above (2019 and August 2022). After removing this content from occupational burnout added by you in July 2022, I reviewed your contribs and find that you are still, and recently, not respecting WP:CWW. Samples of concerning edit summaries:
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Neurosis&diff=prev&oldid=1166515671
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Neurosis&diff=prev&oldid=1165465882
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Neurosis&diff=prev&oldid=1150952109
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Neurosis&diff=prev&oldid=1145406253
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Catharsis&diff=prev&oldid=1142526753
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Neurosis&diff=prev&oldid=1150960390
There is much more, including at other articles, but I stopped there. I have not checked for other copyvio.
I am additionally concerned about how often you add uncited material, particularly where WP:MEDRS applies. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi SandyGeorgia. Thank you for taking an interest in the quality of entries that I have been working to improve. I hope you have found I have done much more good than harm.
- Yes, I should do CWW better. I forget there is a standard for that. Probably because I never see it used in edit histories. I do always acknowledge that material is copied from elsewhere in Wikipedia. I will review the rule before I next copy content within Wikipedia.
- I have provided hundreds of cites for my recent additions to the histories of psychological subjects. By all means add "citation needed" where you believe a statement isn't supported by an immediately adjacent cited source. I will very likely add a reference in response.
- I'm not trying to use unlicensed content. I'm not trying to make anything up.Transient-understanding (talk) 01:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
September 2023
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Career counseling into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. GenQuest "scribble" 19:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
[edit]
Your edit to History of autism has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Ontario, California
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ontario, California, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles. Thanks for that work. A bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Medicare (Australia)
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Medicare (Australia), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neurosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weir Mitchell.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikiproject Medicine May 2024 Newsletter
[edit]
- Issue 22—May 2024
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Hello all. Another irregular edition of the newsletter. I was inspired to collect this after seeing several medicine-interested editors nominate their first good article. Please review a GA nomination if you have time, and help support our colleagues' efforts:
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- Wikipedia:Good article reassessment is back in business, with a new process and new coordinators. If you see medicine-related GAs that may no longer meet the GA criteria, feel free to nominate them for attention/reassessment (please, not too many at once, lest we get overwhelmed). I'll incorporate them into the listings above.
- Maintenance category of the month: Articles with topics of unclear notability (I've listed just the 36 that start with "A"; there are 398 total).
- Note for the curious: 24,211 of the 57,554 articles (42%) tagged as part of WP:MED have some maintenance tag.
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine at 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC).
WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - November 2024
[edit]- Issue 23—November 2024
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Hello all. A short edition to get the newsletter going again. As it says at the bottom, if you have thoughts on how the newsletter could be useful/interesting to you, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Newsletter:
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- Help WikiProject Unreferenced articles with their November backlog drive by addressing the 130 medicine articles lacking sources.
- Reminder that you can follow medicine-related deletion discussions, GA nominations, merge requests and more by watchlisting Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Article_alerts. Many of these discussions would benefit from more attention.
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)