Jump to content

User talk:TornadoLGS/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Using sources from the NwS

https://twitter.com/nwslittlerock/status/1376576884033617920?s=21 1.6 :) Colin777724 (talk) 05:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Tropical cyclone

Would you be able to help with fixing up Tropical cyclone to avoid a FARC? I'm getting ready to do the intensity section, which will be a lot of work. I should be able to get that done by myself, although it will be quite time-consuming. I don't know exactly how much still has to be done, but I know pop culture needs to be expanded to a worldwide view, and references are outdated in other sections (2000s/older aren't acceptable anymore for certain aspects). The talk page has some information on plans for the article. NoahTalk 02:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

@Hurricane Noah: I'll look into it, though I'm not a major writer of prose on Wikipedia. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States tornadoes from July to August 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton, Wisconsin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Twenty-Tens Decade Started

Hey. I know we have crossed paths every now and then with weather articles, so I wanted to invite you to a new WikiProject, the WikiProject of the Twenty-Tens decade. It was proposed near the end of May, but it was officially created today. Not sure if you would be interested, but I thought I would drop you an invite and say hi. Elijahandskip (talk) 02:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States tornadoes from April to June 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Midway, Mississippi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

PS: Please consider setting up archiving for your talk page ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
@TheresNoTime: Done that! TornadoLGS (talk) 20:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You DESERVE it. V. E. (talk) 18:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

@Visnelma: Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States tornadoes in July 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carolina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States tornadoes in October 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peters Township, Pennsylvania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

UAA

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 19:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

@Cabayi: Thank you for reminding me on the promotional end of things. Does the name not still imply shared account? I don't quite see how the username policies of other wikis apply here. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
The other wiki's policies don't apply here, but if the user hasn't edited (or tried to edit) this wiki then this wiki's policies don't apply to them either. Cabayi (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Ah, okay. Citing the German Wiki had confused me. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:48, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. I'm working on how I explain this to folks. I seem to find a couple of mistaken reports each week. Does the following make it clearer, or sound too preachy?
There are over 300 language versions of Wikipedia. Are you sure your username is valid in all of them? Receiving a block in 2 or more of them could leave you liable to a global lock without making a single mistake on this wiki. We should WP:AGF until shown otherwise.
Cheers, Cabayi (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
@Cabayi: It does come across as a tad patronizing. The one thing it does make clear is the potential for global locks. I think something closer to the original version could work, but with an added note that a block here can affect a user's other Wiki accounts, would make the message clearer. Otherwise, it comes across a bit like responding to criminal allegations by citing the laws of other countries where the alleged actions are legal. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, it's a work in progress :-) - Cabayi (talk) 20:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Help with editing

Hi there i was wondering if you could help me - i want to learn how to add stuff to Wikipedia - is there anything i can watch ie a instructional video etc as its very unclear about how to actually do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerthDigitalEdge (talk • contribs) 23:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Notability of weather draft - Help requested

Hey TornadoLGS. You have worked with a lot of weather articles, so I was wondering if you could help me with the Draft:Wikipedia:Notability (weather), which I was requested to make for the AfC reviewers. It won't be ready for a while obviously, but if you know some notability tips, feel free to add them. Once the draft feels detailed enough, it will be moved to mainspace as an essay, followed by a WP Weather/AfC discussion and vote to make it official WP:Notability subject-specific guidelines. Elijahandskip (talk) 07:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

@Elijahandskip: I'll take some look at it, though, admittedly I am not experienced in any sort of changes to guidelines and such. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Derecho

It’s a derecho bud it’s already taking off. It’s going to be one Colin777724 (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

@Colin777724: At the time that you first added the section, no tornadoes had been reported. Hence, it was premature. Now that tornadoes are being reported, a section is can be added. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes for sure and the fact that this system started out with such high wind speeds and is still increasing I could see a derecho really being a reality Colin777724 (talk) 23:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Tornado

I have nominated Tornado for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. NoahTalk 13:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas TornadoLGS


Elijahandskip (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

WikiProject Weather 2022 C/B Class Drive

Hello TornadoLGS! WikiProject Weather is doing a drive during 2022 to get all new 2022 weather articles to at least C class, with the hope of B Class. I thought you might be interested in the WP Weather drive, so I wanted to drop a message about it. Elijahandskip (talk) 14:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tornadoes of 2020/Deadly

Template:Tornadoes of 2020/Deadly has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur Deerin Call

A tag has been placed on Arthur Deerin Call requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

I appreciate helpful comments at AIV ☺️ -- TNT (talk • she/her) 05:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

No prob, Bob. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

I didn't make those bad edits on Walmart. I promise

I promise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.176.64 (talk) 01:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

COI statement

TornadoLGS, please check COI statement in Talk:A Totally Hermetic Electron-Nucleus Apparatus that I made in May 2021, and corresponding warning statement in the draft version of Draft:A Totally Hermetic Electron-Nucleus Apparatus. Migue.arratia. Besides, your flag led to a reversal to a draft that I wrote, so if you are worried about COI just bring it down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Migue.arratia (talk • contribs) 06:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Saw on your infobox that today was your wikibirthday. Have a great day! Ifnord (talk) 21:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ifnord: Thanks! TornadoLGS (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Tornado intensity

[1]

If I'm correct, why did you restore false information to the article? It's pretty impressive that an event "occurring typically once every few years" could happen eight times from 2008-2011. Also, the source only covers tornadoes in the US, so it's unreliable for saying that no such tornadoes happened between those dates, when elsewhere the article says that Bangladesh and Canada also have violent tornadoes. And why is it so critical to give precise details about dates and little US towns in a worldwide article? This is an encyclopedia, not a newspaper report of tornadoes and reports from years and years ago. 49.198.51.54 (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

EF5 is purple?

So ummm the EF scale has an update now with EF5 being purple? Colin777724 (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

@Colin777724: The discussion was mainly in regard to tropical cyclone colors, but the F/EF scales use the same colors as the Saffir-Simpson scale. There is a very lengthy discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather#RfC: Changing the color scheme for storm colors to make it more accessible. The main reason is that it makes the colors more distinguishable from each other. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Nice thanks for telling me Colin777724 (talk) 03:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For opening up a SPI for Hurricaneinfomation. You deserve it! You see, what the f*** is he doing?! Using multiple accounts for sockpuppetry? Severestorm28 12:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
very good edits to weather thanks for your work :> Lolkikmoddi (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

@Lolkikmoddi: Thanks! TornadoLGS (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Tropical Storms arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/WikiProject Tropical Storms. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/WikiProject Tropical Storms/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 13, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/WikiProject Tropical Storms/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 08:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Request

Consensus was found to merge Hurricane Cindy tornado outbreak into Hurricane Cindy (2005) a few weeks ago. Can you preform the merger, similar to the one you did to 2016 Pensacola tornado? 68.129.11.36 (talk) 16:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Help with editing on David Obiosa

Hello, Pls I was wondering if you could help me with editing David Obiosa's info

His profile:PROFILE OF BISHOP DAVID FIRDAY AMAECHI OBIOSA

Bishop David Friday Amaechi Obiosa was born on August 23, 1963 to the late Pa. Joseph and Mrs. Victoria Obiosa of Umu-Emejulu family of Ogbeugolo kindred of Umuagwuyam Eze-Inyi Qtrs, Inyi in Ndokwa East Local Government Area, Delta State. Bishop Obiosa attended Nnobia Primary School, Inyi where he obtained his First School Leaving Certificate. He furthered his studies at Institute of Continuing Education, Kwale and Ebologu Grammar School, Utagba-Uno where he got his West Africa School certificate and General Certificate in Education (GCE) respectively. For his ordination training he schooled at the Trinity Theological College, Umuahia, where he begged his Diploma in Theology. At St. Paul’s College, Awka/University of Nigeria, Nsukka, he obtained Dip Th. And B.A. (Hons), and at Crowther Graduate Theological Seminary Abeokuta he bagged a Masters Degree (M.Th) in Biblical Studies (Old Testament). Rt. Rev. D.F.A Obiosa had vocational trainings in the following capacities: Inter-Diocesan Exchange Programme between Asaba and Jos Dioceses in Pankshin Archdeaconry, Diocese of Jos, Plateau State, 2002 International/Leadership Training Programme for Church Leaders all over Africa at the Bishop Desmond Tutu Centre Nairaobi, Kenya, 2011 Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) Bishop’s Training, Ibru Centre Agbarha-Otor, Delta State, 2011 He had served as follows: Local helper, St. Stephen’s Anglican Church, Umuagwuyam-Eze-Inyi, Inyi, 1985-1987 Catechist, St. Paul’s Anglican Church, Abarra-Uno, 1987-1988 Chaplain to the Pioneer Bishop of Asaba, Late Rt. Rev. Dr. Rowland N.C Nwosu/Curate, All Saints Cathedral Asaba/Supervisor, St. Peter’s Nursery & Cathedral Primary Schools, Bishopscourt, Asaba, 1991-1992 Vicar, Emmanuel Church, Ibusa, 1995 2nd Chaplaincy to Bishop R.N.C. Nwosu/Curate, All Saint’s Cathedral Asaba/Supervisor, St. Peter’s Nursery & Cathedral Primary Schools, Bishopscourt, Asaba, 1995-1998

Chaplain, All Saint’s Cathedral, Asaba, 1999 Canon Residentiary, All Saint’s Cathedral, Asaba, 2000-2001 Pioneer Parish Priest/Vicar, St. Philip’s Parish/Church, West End, Asaba 2002 Supervisor, Akwukwu-Igbo Archdeaconry, 2003- early 2005 Supervisor, Asaba Archdeaconry, 2005-2006 Archdeacon, Asaba Archdeaconry, and later, Asaba Central Archdeaconry, after Ibusa (2007) and Asaba west End (2008) Archdeaconries were carved out of Asaba Archdeaconry, January 2006-June, 2008. Ordination Preferment, election, Consecration and Enthronement as Bishop: Diaconate: July 14, 1991 by Rt. Rev. R.N.C. Nwosu, Bishop of Asaba. Priesthood: July 12, 1991 as above Preferred canon: May 2000 as above Preferred Archdeacon, May 2006 by Most Rev. Nicolas D. Okoh, Archbishop of Bendel Province & Bishop of Asaba Elected Bishop in the Church of God for the newly created missionary Diocese of Ndokwa at the Episcopal Synod that was held at St. Mary’s Cathedral, Nnewi, March 28, 2008, presided over by the Most Rev. Dr. Peter J. Akinola, D.D. then Archbishop, Metropolitan and Primate of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) Consecrated Bishop, May 14, 2008 at the Cathedral Church of St. James the Great, Oke-Bola, Ibadan, by the Most Rev. Dr. Peter J. Akinola. Enthroned Bishop of Ndokwa, June 4, 2008, at the Cathedral Church of Christ, Obiaruku. Appointment Chaplain, Knights of Saints Christopher & Mary, Diocese of Asaba, (Anglican Communion), 1998-2008 Asaba Diocesan Communicator Member, Asaba Diocesan Board of Mission & Evangelism Member, Asaba Diocesan Bishop’s Examining Chaplain Member, Archbishop’s Advisory Committee, Asaba Diocese Between 1996 and 2004, David lectured at St. Paul’s University College, Awka, in the areas of Biblical Studies, Church History, Liturgy and Worship and Philosophy. While studying at St. Paul’s University College, Awka, David Chaired the Student’s Union’s Constitution Drafting Committee, which produced the constitution of the union. He was equally the pioneer President of the Press club of the Institution, responsible for the publications of the Theological Magazine. Rt.Rev. David F.A. Obiosa is happily married to Mrs. Joy Ifunanya Obiosa and the marriage is blessed with wonderful children. Since his enthronement as the Bishop of Ndokwa, The Diocese has been improving tremendously in terms of spirituality, increase in membership, in the number of Churches and in infrastructures, to the glory of God.

Born: 23 August, 1963 Children: 4 Diocese: Diocese of Ndokwa Consecrated:May 14, 2008 Enthroned:4th June, 2008 In office: 2008-present Church: Church of Nigeria, Anglican Communion Education: Institute of Theology Paul University, Awka. Trinity Theological College, Umuahia(Dip. Th). University of Nigeria, B. A(Hons). Crowther Graduate Theological Seminary(M. Th) Previous positions: Archdeacon, Asaba Archdeaconry(now Asaba Central Archdeaconry) 

Onyema2moro2008 (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
@Onyema2moro2008: I'm afraid I don't have much experience editing articles about living people. I suggest going to the Teahouse where you might get help from someone more experienced in this area. You don't need to copy all that text; just provide a link to the article.
As to what I can say: The first issue, and the reason I reverted your edit in the first place, is that the information you want to add to the article had to come from somewhere. You will need to provide one or more reliable sources for where you got this information. This is especially important for articles about living people. The page at WP:CITE has information on how to do that. On the content that you added to my talk page, it may be more detailed than needed (we don't needed to know every detail about his career). Parts of it do not adhere to a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view. In short, this means that an article should be objective where possible, and not praise or disparage its subject. The basic biographical information you provided at the bottom (date of birth, title(s), number of children ect.) can be summarized by using Template:Infobox person. Again, you might get more help on this at the Teahouse. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Should the EF5 tornado wiki page be updated?

I haven't talked to you in a while and I know that there hasn't been any EF5 tornado yet since Moore Oklahoma 2013 but I kinda feel like the section for Possible F5/EF5 tornadoes officially rated F4/EF4 or lower on the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_F5_and_EF5_tornadoes page should be updated since there has been a couple tornadoes that were really close to being EF5 status which one was the April 12th, 2020 Soso/Bassfield Tornado, another being the December 10th, 2021 Mayfield/Benton, KY Tornado. Those two had velocities over 200mph above ground and weren't confirmed to be but were possibly close to being rated EF5 status since they had actual potential of being EF5's. Also another one on March 25th, 2021 being the Greensboro/Centreville Ef3 Tornado had somehow velocities up to 296 mph on dealt of velocity which someone said that in a chat. I'm not sure how fast the speeds were but if that person was telling the truth then maybe it had that strength over an area where it didn't impact structures. SO yea 3 possible tornadoes being EF5 status that should be on the possible F5/EF5 tornadoes officially rated F4/EF4 or lower. I mean the lost of life is sad and impacts on friends and families is tragic but any tornado can and will indanger the ones that are in it's wake. So do you think that section deserves to be updated or just keep waiting until the next tornado has a chance to be on the list?

@Colin777724: There would need to be reliable published sources for all of these. I know that there are certainly people who would say the Soso/Bassfield and Mayfield/Benton were EF5s (or at least possible EF5s), but I am not aware of it being in anything reliable enough to cite (honestly, this comes up a lot for tornadoes with high-end EF4 ratings). For the >200 mph wind speeds, I would usually want the source (if one is provided) to still mention possible EF5 status directly, partly because I'm not sure how winds high up in a tornado translate to near-ground speeds, so it's a possible WP:SYNTH issue. As to the third one, I wouldn't put that much stake in in it since: (1) It was just a chat and (2) From what I could find, Delta-V refers to the velocity difference between the two sides of the tornado, rather than the actual wind speed. I don't necessarily doubt that these tornadoes reached EF5 strength, but the issue, again, is the sourcing. There's actually a tornado or two that I'd like to see added (Bowdle, South Dakota May 22, 2010), if only the sources were there. I actually did quite a bit of cleanup of that article (in addition to putting it in the current format) back in 2020 since a lot of the additions were not supported by sources, mostly WP:OR and WP:SYNTH issues. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Well man that is some very interesting information you have told me. And that one from 2010 is underrated for the intensity. Yazoo city is also another one that had very strong velocities. 2010 however is just interesting due to there being 13 officially rated EF4 tornadoes and some of them were quite possibly close to the ef5 intensity and status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin777724 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@Colin777724: I hadn't heard anything about Yazoo City possibly being an EF5 outside of misinformed YouTube comments. I have an interest in finding something for Bowdle since Tim Samaras actually made remarks about its possible EF5 status at a lecture I attended in 2012. But I'm not aware of anything that's actually published. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:48, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Discord?

Do you ever use discord by any chance since I use everyday an talk to my friends who are interested in weather. If you have it I would love to add you on their an we can talk to each other daily on discord.

Hello there! Thank you for reverting the vandalism!

I was not on Wikipedia at that time, but I saw an anonymous user vandalising my talk page (it wasn't me). Thank you for reverting the vandalism! Tematikkp (talk) 13:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

My adding to the users incidents page.

I apologize, i'm still not great at my ability to create articles, however i am learning & have recently learn how to make links and sources. I am trurly passionate about information and i mean no harm, i am only trying to expand the knowledge of Wikipedia!

Please also note that my recent page on Mary Jean Irving did infact have sources Nyaytyhyaynyiyeylyluytyeysy (talk) 04:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Tropical cyclone

I would like to ask what you think about my recent changes at Tropical cyclone. NoahTalk 19:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@Hurricane Noah: It took a quick look and it seems okay. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
I plan to submit this to peer review eventually to get feedback on improving it once I have had a chance to change everything that I believe needs fixed. This article will definitely need feedback there given how complex it is and the amount of work that’s being done. I have gotten a lot done since May 13 when I started my work. This article still has a long ways to go and will probably take months to get written up to my standards. NoahTalk 20:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Can we add substance to headlines on tornado articles?

Can we add more eye catching headlines to the sections? Thought it would be a nice idea and wanted to see what you think.

From, Smuckers It has to be good

@Smuckers: In my experience most section headings are pretty minimalist and not made to be eye-catching, and "eye-catching" headings don't seem entirely encyclopedic. MOS:BODY says that headings should generally be based on the precedent of similar articles, with other yearly tornado articles simply listing the month. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Ohh ok gotcha!! Smuckers It has to be good 01:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Transclusion of Tornadoes of 1952 list page errors

Can you help me figure out what is wrong with these transclusions in the List of United States tornadoes in 1952? ChessEric (talk · contribs) 02:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

adding tornadoes to 2022

I suck at wiki editing but i do a ton of research so i was thinking i can just relay some info to you and hace you put them in.

https://www.weather.gov/gld/July26Tornadoes Here are 3 EFUs that need to be added. https://twitter.com/NWSTwinCities/status/1555338594956431360 And here is an EFU in Minnesota on the 31st. IndyPlaneSpot (talk) 02:27, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

@TornadoLGS IndyPlaneSpot (talk) 01:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
@IndyPlaneSpot: Sorry, I've been busy with things lately. Not sure when I might get to it. Have you brought it up at Talk:List of United States tornadoes from July to August 2022? You might grab someone else's attention about it. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Ok thanks! IndyPlaneSpot (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Can we be friends?

Hey, can we be friends? I'm obsessed at tornadoes but not too expert. It's nice to meet you! Sarge Da2 (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

AIV

Do you have a recent blocked account of that LTA I can compare Steplo1011 to? — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 19:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

@TheresNoTime:. The most recent one I am aware of is Seddon227. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman for some others I've reported. Changing cyclone names, acing innocent, and frequent references to WP:AGF are typical behavior for this one. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Hey.

Tell me more about the original hurricane colors. And why was reverted back? TheEasternEditer (talk) 20:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Also let’s be friends if you’d like :) TheEasternEditer (talk) 20:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

@TheEasternEditer: I left a reply to your comment at the RfC. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I saw that! TheEasternEditer (talk) 20:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Just a heads up

Just letting you know, I linked the talk page discussion to an SPI. Here is the SPI in case you want to watch it. Elijahandskip (talk) 04:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

True vandalism

My vandalism it the use a mejore wikipedia and wikimedia, my vandalism it no intessional it my use a up the wikipedia OK Unar64P (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

@Unar64P: I know you want to contribute. Your edits are not vandalism if you actually mean well. I have to say, though, many of your messages are difficult or impossible to understand and you might do better here if you work on improving your English. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:07, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
oh ok Unar64P (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

We got a troll in the possible F5/EF5 discussion

That new editor, Caleb Routt, is for sure a troll. On top of debating Mayfield’s addition to the list, he also commented to remove the 2013 El Reno tornado from the list. Fun…I thought having discussions somewhat off-talk page, but still on the talk-page would help stop the trolls from commenting in the Mayfield rating, but somehow they found the discussions. Elijahandskip (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

@Elijahandskip: I saw those comments. I'm going to assume good faith for now since they could be just very strictly adhering to the idea that the EF scale is a damage scale and not a wind scale. But I'll see what more happens. TornadoLGS (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Well, my good faith assumptions just ran out. They just tried to delete 2013 El Reno from the list. [2] Elijahandskip (talk) 20:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Headstrong, but I can't see that they're necessarily acting in bad faith. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 03:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Reporting dormant accounts to WP:UAA

Hi, TornadoLGS. I just actioned your report of "SenorCumBum" at UAA, and only afterward noticed that the account's edits are all several months old. I won't reverse the block, since that wouldn't serve any purpose, but for future record, please don't report accounts to UAA that haven't edited recently. Thanks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 02:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@Tamzin: Duly noted. I had just figured "any account" with a username like that, but I understand. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Christmas present for contributions at 2022 Atlantic hurricane season

The Tropical Cyclone Barnstar
Thank you for your contributions at this season's article. ✶Mitch199811✶ 00:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Reversion of your taking down of my update to a co-worker and close friend's page

Hello. I see that you have reverted my edits of Rochelle Buffenstein's page that was updated to reflect the last 4-6 years of history that was severely lacking in context, information and citations.

Anyone can see that the update was been substantial, both in terms of clarity, history of the remarkable individual and their contributions to science.

Her previous page was made by a high-schooler almost half a decade ago. Is that what you think is acceptable for wikipedia? VAmoroso13 (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

By Wikipedia's standards all information must be cited to published reliable sources. If there is no verifiable source you can cite, the information cannot be included. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anjum Sharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anjum Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjum Sharma. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, TornadoLGS,
You received this notice because you moved this article to Draft space, creating a redirect that another editor turned into an article. Twinkle still see you as the page creator, hence the notification. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
@Liz: Thanks. You might want to take a look at the original page creator Jelasa Eding as they have created several unreferenced BLP articles. I have given them a warning TornadoLGS (talk) 04:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
@Liz: Also, do you mind if I copy that message to their talk page? TornadoLGS (talk) 04:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bdeshfoudation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bdeshfoudation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jay 💬 13:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Qapf

See fuller edit and worked example you can hopefully see why QAPF is not a true ternary diagram. Almos but not quite. Jamtrees2017 (talk) 03:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Not happy with you

Let's start with Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. Debresser (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

@Debresser: Apologies, I did not see, in time, that you were a regular. I found the removed content to be comprehensible and, from your edit summary, incorrectly surmised that you were non-native English speaker. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
@Debresser: In any case, I think the sentences could be re-added and re-phrased to be comprehensible. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
I am, indeed, a non-native English speaker. Have been so for over 40 years.
Rephrasing might be a good idea. Debresser (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Could you c/e Tornado outbreak of February 12, 1945

Hey TornadoLGS! I recently did a full write-up for the Tornado outbreak of February 12, 1945, getting it to a very solid C-class, and based on some information on Wikipedia’s discord after I asked some questions, it might now be up to a borderline B-class. It needs a copy/edit though. Since you are really good at doing the copy/edit work-ups on tornado articles, would you mind taking a look at it? Elijahandskip (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

@Elijahandskip: I'll take a look at some point. If you haven't noticed, I haven't been very active on here lately. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crucifixion in the Roman Empire (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seawolf35 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Per above comment, It will need to have reliable sources before it can be moved to the mainspace
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Seawolf35 (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, TornadoLGS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seawolf35 (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
@Seawolf35: Could this just be moved back to “not currently submitted for review? I didn’t mean to submit the draft. I accidentally put the wrong template on it after moving it to draft space. TornadoLGS (talk) 16:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Ok, thanks, I’ll move it back. Seawolf35 (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
I have moved it back to the no submitted state. Thanks for pointing this out to me.Best, Seawolf35 (talk) 17:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Responding to the change

Can you tell me how can i explain my reasoning of deleting the texts? Marjukur Rahib (talk) 07:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

@Marjukur Rahib: Surely you know why you removed the text. Enter that reasoning in your edit summary. The function of an edit summary is not just to explain what you did, but why you did it. If you didn't have a reason for removing the text, then you shouldn't have done so. TornadoLGS (talk) 15:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I've recently seen you doing a lot of anti-vandalism work. Good job! ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze__wolf 19:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Question | pointers for improving draft page Rory Pilgrim

Hi TornadoLGS,

Thanks for taking the time to review the draft page on Rory Pilgrim I'm working on. You indicated that the tone in parts of this page is somewhat promotional, and that it ought to be written to be more neutral. Promotion is not my intention and I'm perfectly happy change the text. For this I would welcome some pointers on where you found the tone to be particularly promotional. Could you kindly provide me with some steers?

Many thanks,

-t TiliavonLinne (talk) 15:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Ah! I see some edits have been made and it indeed looks cleaner now :-) TiliavonLinne (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
@TiliavonLinne: Than you for reaching out. A few phrases come across as promotional. You have removed a couple, but one that stands out to me is "Through Pilgrim's work spaces are created where people of diverse backgrounds can come together and develop new forms of understanding and caretaking." There are a few similar statements. I think one way to approach it is to avoid the sort of phrasing you would expect in a brochure or similar document. To a degree, you want to avoid subjective language. TornadoLGS (talk) 15:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this clarification, I see how the wording can come across as promotional. My intention was to provide wikipedia users with an indication of what the art consists of, something which can be challenging with a thing as interpretative as contemporary conceptual art. The actual text I took from Pilgrim's artist profile on the website of the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam, which is written by the curators of that museum. However, now I consider that if this description from that museum is included maybe it ought to be in quotation marks? Thanks in advance for your help! -t TiliavonLinne (talk) 15:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
@TiliavonLinne: Text in an article should be paraphrased and direct quotations should be used sparingly. This is largely to avoid copyright infringement. TornadoLGS TornadoLGS (talk) 16:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Clear and makes sense, I altered the text now, grouping the above mentioned thematic description with the description of artistic media used. The actual quote is now smaller and clearly indicated by quotation marks. TiliavonLinne (talk) 17:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Mariya Didi Article

Hello, I am aware that the article is lacking citations. However, Maldives lacks considerable coverage of their politics. Therefore, as a close member of the government, Wikipedia is one of the few resources that Maldivians have to inform the public about their ongoings. I will be adding citations as I find them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheoryGames (talk • contribs) 19:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

@TheoryGames: Don't add the information unless you have the citations ready. Add the citations when you add the information; not at a later time. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
@TheoryGames: Also, the text you added had a promotional tone, which is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
I have edited those parts. Feel free to take a look and let me know how I can improve it, thank you TheoryGames (talk) 20:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
@TheoryGames: The addition of sources is an improvement, but the tone is still promotional. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch (especially the section on puffery for more on that. I also recommend to you take a look at the report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Undisclosed paid editor (again) before pursuing this matter further. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
I would like to restate that I am not a close member of the government. You were correct in assuming it was poorly worded, thank you for the benefit of the doubt. I intended to mean Mariya didi is a close member of the government. TheoryGames (talk) 20:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
I have removed further potential puffery, can you please take a look and let me know how I can improve the article? TheoryGames (talk) 20:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
You can seek more advice about this at the teahouse. While I couple pick out some of the more glaring problems, I am not as experienced as others in dealing with WP:BLP articles. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Tagging categories

Hello, TornadoLGS,

It's a bit confusing when you tag categories for deletion for CSD C1 and then also another criteria. This is because empty categories are supposed to sit for a week in Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion before while pages tagged for most other speedy deletion criteria can be simply deleted upon review.

I think the answer here is to just pick one criteria to tag a category with, either CSD C1 if it is an empty category or with another criteria if the page has been created, say, by error. This would leave less possibility for doubt on the part of the administrator who is reviewing the tagged pages and really only one criteria is necessary. Thank you for all of your help. Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

@Liz: Sorry. I was a bit confused since I wasn't quite sure how to tag them. They were in the wrong namespace but I had wondered if, by some technicality, G6 wouldn't apply. But they were clearly unsuitable pages. Would G6 be the best option for non-category pages created in that namespace? TornadoLGS (talk) 22:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm new here.

Hello, TornadoLGS,

I guess I am needing help with a Wikipedia page that I'm trying to edit. It keeps getting reverted back, and I would like to know what I need to do differently in order for it to be published correctly. Please advise, I am new to the Wikipedia gang.

The page I'm trying to edit is https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Margaret_Goodell

JasonnBruce (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi JasonnBruce, my main concern was the addition of external links to the article, which appears to have been largely resolved. One thing to say, to keep in mind as a new editor, is that it is generally good to follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle. Basically, if your edit gets reverted, it is better to take the issue to the talk page rather than persist in making the edit (see also the policy on edit warring). On another note, because your edits focused on a single article, one editor posted a message on your talk page about a possible conflict of interest. Basically, this means that you should disclose if you are in any way affiliated with Margaret Goodell. TornadoLGS (talk) 15:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

DDP DJ D P

This article and similar ones are created by User:Flex Liberia, who is banned from editing. I tagged said article under G5, but I wanted to make sure you're aware of this individual. Thanks. Deauthorized. (talk) 23:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

@Deauthorized: Thank you for letting me know. I actually almost brought it to AfD. Heh. Just had my own run-in with an LTA today. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Fusa (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

Hey TornadoLGS,

I notice that you removed my edit on Fusa (disambiguation) for Flinders University Student Association. Noting that a page doesn’t exist but I believe that this is not correct as there is a page for Flinders University Student Association (FUSA), the link to the page did work on my end. Could you revert your change as it will make the page easier to find for users.

Cheers GassyTrucker GassyTrucker (talk) 05:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

@GassyTrucker:  Done. Sorry. I got a bit mixed up by your edit. I saw one entry was redlinked and mistook it for yours. I have undone my deletion and made the correct edit. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

message

What do you mean by disruptive editing and on what page? I mean no disrespect with this question. CorgiMist3r777 (talk) 16:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

@CorgiMist3r777: I forgot to include the link. Your edit to M67 grenade was disruptive. The main reason is that, in rewriting that section, you left it entirely without references. Information in Wikipedia articles should be supported by references to reliable sources. Also, keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a place for personal essays. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Emmett McAuliffe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmett McAuliffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmett McAuliffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PetitCesar (talk) 16:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Howdy!

Hey TornadoLGS

Just wanted to mention I haven't seen you around the tornado/severe weather article space in a while, it's good to see you editing these outbreak articles again as well as others! Wikiwillz (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

@Wikiwillz: Yeah a few life changes and other stuff going on has drawn me away from weather more than I'd like. I might pop in but still probably won't edit as much as I used to. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Sorry to hear that, it's always good to see you around when you do pop in for sure. Thanks for all you do around here! Wikiwillz (talk) 01:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
@Wikiwillz: Not all bad. I got a new job, which is one thing that has taken up my time. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TornadoLGS/Archive_2&oldid=1245850042"