User talk:Tipkorir

Patrick Korir

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Patrick Korir may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -- Merope 16:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Paul Kihara Waiganjo

A tag has been placed on Paul Kihara Waiganjo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LAA Fan 16:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Paul Kihara Waiganjo

I have nominated Paul Kihara Waiganjo, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Kihara Waiganjo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Citedcover (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to other articles

To link to other articles on Wikipedia, simply do this: [[Kenya]] or [[Arsenal F.C.|Arsenal]]. [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Maurice_Odhiambo Maurice Odhiambo] is only for external links. Also, please do not create any more articles on players who have not played in a fully professional league, as they do not meet our guidelines. Thanks, пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 11:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to know how to format an article properly, have a look at the changes I made here. Please ask if you have any questions. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 11:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Patrick Osiako.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Patrick Osiako.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Mulee. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Giant Snowman 11:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tipkorir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tipkorir. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tipkorir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oliver Maloba

Hello, Tipkorir,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Oliver Maloba, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit _(blether) 15:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just a personal note to follow up on the previous automated message. The article is about a living person, and our BLP policy is quite strict that those must have reliable sourcing - we can't host unsourced articles about living people. If you can't add some reliable sources to it in the next week it will be deleted, although I'd be happy to turn it into a draft for you to work on until you can add sources if you'd prefer. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 16:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nairobi City Stars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimmy Bageya (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing has been added to the page following the earlier declinature. The subject does not pass WP:NFOOTY and coverage is not enough to satisfy WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jimmy Bageya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jimmy Bageya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Ochieng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2013 Kenyan Super Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Augustine Ochieng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KCB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wycliffe Otieno for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wycliffe Otieno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wycliffe Otieno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. qedk (t 桜 c) 12:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vincent Otieno

The article Vincent Otieno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ebrima Sanneh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ebrima Sanneh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebrima Sanneh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 05:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ebrima Sanneh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ebrima Sanneh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebrima Sanneh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 07:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oliver Maloba for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oliver Maloba and many other of your articles are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Maloba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 14:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jimmy Bageya

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jimmy Bageya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Jackson Foundation (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at WP:NCORP. In addition please see WP:COI and WP:PAID (the latter page is mandatory) and make the necessary disclosures.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 12:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson Foundation

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jonathan Jackson Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonathan Jackson Foundation

Hello Tipkorir,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jonathan Jackson Foundation for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the subject actually exists isn't relevant to whether or not it's promotional. Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, this article read like a piece of sales literature for the company or part of the company website. I can restore it to a draft version for you to work on, but I see from the other comments on this page that you did that before and you were told that it sounded promotional when you submitted it. Can I suggest that if I do that then you submit it to articles for creation for you to get feedback again, and that you try to address any feedback before moving it to mainspace - if you don't then it's likely to get deleted again.

Also are you affiliated with this organisation in any way, or did they pay you to write a Wikipedia page about them? If so then you need to read the pages on conflicts of interest and paid editing disclosure. Hut 8.5 08:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bensci54

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

Much obliged that should you restore the draft I will take the direction you have pointed out; of sending it to articles for creation

You seem to have lots of experience and I'd wish to learn a lot more from you.

I work for a sister company to the Jonathan Jackson Foundation and I was only helping out (for free) to create the page. I will read the pages you have pointed out to understand more. Tipkorir (talk) 10:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)tipkorir[reply]

OK, I've restored it to Draft:Jonathan Jackson Foundation for you to work on. Please submit it to WP:AFC when you're done and if it's rejected please address the feedback. If it gets moved to mainspace in this state (or a similar state) it will likely just be deleted again. Hut 8.5 13:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bensci54

I will rework it appropriately. Thank you for the second chance Tipkorir (talk) 17:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)tipkorir[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oliver Maloba

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oliver Maloba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Maloba (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 14:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please please, point that out for me the copyrighted part and I will adjust it accordingly Tipkorir (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman). Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Early Life, Career sections are still entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to edit it further as I source for relevant references. I will re-submit it later on Tipkorir (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lordship Africa (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lordship Africa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lordship Africa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 18:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are well noted. I'll rework and try and seek other referencing sources then resubmit the page Tipkorir (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justiyaya was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Source 4 is a non-independent source, source 3 seems more like a passing mention, source 2 may be a sponsored post per [1]. Would likely need 2-3 more independent, reliable sources that give significant coverage to the subject for a good claim on notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justi yaya 13:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman). Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments noted. Considering all references have been flagged, I'll have to get the page deleted for now. As largely pointed out, I can't seem to find any other articles on him. Hopefully within the year there will be more credible ones that I can use. Tipkorir (talk) 05:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Masoud Juma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Okumu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kevin Okumu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BlameRuiner (talk) 11:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kevin Okumu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Okumu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Okumu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 08:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacob Osano

The article Jacob Osano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 09:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seen your pointers on this new page. Will try re-work, then update it to meet the criteria Tipkorir (talk) 10:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-worked Jacob Osano's page and replaced some references. I'll appreciate if you can look at it one more time Tipkorir (talk) 08:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tipkorir

Thank you for creating Maurice Korir.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tipkorir (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caroline Cherotich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Cherotich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Cherotich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Davis Agesa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Davis Agesa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BlameRuiner (talk) 13:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Calvins Masawa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Calvins Masawa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvins Masawa. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Singularity42 (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wycliffe Otieno

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wycliffe Otieno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wycliffe Otieno. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Singularity42 (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salim Abdalla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salim Abdalla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salim Abdalla. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Singularity42 (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonathan Jackson Foundation

Hello, Tipkorir. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonathan Jackson Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Arap Marindich

Hello, Tipkorir, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Dial911, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arap Marindich, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arap Marindich.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dial911}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dial911 (talk) 22:07, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dial911: your comments are very well received, and I appreciate the notes. I understand the concern of whether the page is suitable for Wikipedia or not, but Arap Marindich has suddenly become a hit in news rooms due to his skits leading to several articles on him due to a new found notability. That informed the need to create his page. Let me see how best to re-work it to save it from an ultimate deletion. Tipkorir (talk) 06:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arap Marindich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arap Marindich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arap Marindich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dial911 (talk) 22:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kidnapped (2017 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kidnapped (2017 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 05:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is well noted. I'll seek out more references and improve on it. Thank you for the pointers. Tipkorir (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jonathan Jackson Foundation

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jonathan Jackson Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ke.opera.news

Hi Tipkorir, thank you for your contributions! I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the website ke.opera.news, since I saw that you used it as a source a few days ago. ke.opera.news looks like a good source on the surface, but together with ng.opera.news, gh.opera.news, za.opera.news, and ci.opera.news, it belongs to a family of news platforms where contributors can register and submit articles, but there is no actual fact checking or editorial oversight (they have a disclaimer saying "Any/all written content and images displayed are provided by the blogger/author, appear herein as submitted by the blogger/author and are unedited by Opera News.") This means that the site counts as a self-published source, and is not useful as a source in Wikipedia. Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources, especially for biographies, are pretty strict, and any website where people can sign up and publish information is generally not a reliable source – that includes Wikipedia itself! Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 14:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is well noted. Thank you. Tipkorir (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lordship Africa

Hello, Tipkorir. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lordship Africa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jimmy Kintu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy Kintu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Kintu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 09:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is noted. Will look for ways to have it improved Tipkorir (talk) 14:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page has since been improved following the notes you issued Tipkorir (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gabriel Njoroge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Njoroge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Njoroge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 09:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is well noted. I'll have the article improved to keep it up Tipkorir (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page has since been updated following your pointers Tipkorir (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabriel Njoroge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lordship Africa

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lordship Africa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Bryett

The article Tim Bryett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Football coach who fails GNG and SPORTSBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 06:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This message is well received. I'll have a relook at the page, and rework it accordingly to avoid a deletion Tipkorir (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a fresh look at the page following an update. I believe there is evidence that Tim Bryett is now notable Tipkorir (talk) 17:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim Bryett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Bryett, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bryett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a fresh look at the page following an update. I believe there is evidence that Tim Bryett is now notable Tipkorir (talk) 17:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gideon Ochieng for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gideon Ochieng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon Ochieng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 08:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tim Bryett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul-Samadu Musafiri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul-Samadu Musafiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul-Samadu Musafiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 10:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charlene Ruto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charlene Ruto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kidnapped (2017 film)

Hello, Tipkorir. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kidnapped (2017 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kidnapped (2017 film)

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kidnapped".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jonathan Jackson Foundation

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jonathan Jackson Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Oguso moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chris Oguso, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is well noted. I'll have the article reworked then reposted Tipkorir (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Owino moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vincent Owino, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is well noted. I'll seek more references then submit it for consideration once again. Thank you Tipkorir (talk) 06:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hi Tipkorir! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vincent Owino

Hello, Tipkorir. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vincent Owino, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tipkorir. Thank you for your work on Robinson Asenwa. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Tipkorir, nice work on your new article. I would suggest adding it to appropriate Wikiprojects, especially Biogrpahy.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Kindly guide me on how to do that Tipkorir (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tipkorir, the easiest way of doing this is to go to the Talk page of the article in question, and copy the Biography template - {{WikiProject Biography}} - into the top of the page. There is further information available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography, but just pasting in the template will get the article into the Wikiproject, where others can see it's been added and will help expand the article. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 10:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tipkorir. Thank you for your work on Bakee Mtaani. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for you work. Suggest merging this to become a section in the Jonathan Jackson Foundation article but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tipkorir. Thank you for your work on Jenga Jirani. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for you work. I marked as reviewed but IMO it would be better to merge this into the Foundation article. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 Kenyan Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tusker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Víctor Omune

Hello Tipkorir,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Víctor Omune for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Víctor Omune to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Adamtt9 (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help out, how can I adjust that? Tipkorir (talk) 05:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Tipkorir. Thank you for your work on Vincent Owino. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I have marked it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronny Kagunzi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ronny Kagunzi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page reworked with more clear references. Consider not deleting it Tipkorir (talk) 07:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ebrimah Sanneh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]