User talk:Thrashmaniac99

Napalm Death

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Napalm Death, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. If you think the lead should be changed, we encourage you to discuss this on Talk:Napalm Death and gain consensus for this change. Thanks! MrMoustacheMM (talk) 00:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. – Richard BB 08:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spiritual Healing album by DEATH

The new Relapse edition of the album has a note by Chuck Schuldiner's sister Beth explaining that the original Relativity version had an error - that the album was not produced by Scott Burns but by Chuck Schuldiner and Eric Greif. The new version is credited this way. Best, A Sniper (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thrashmaniac99, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Thrashmaniac99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Associated acts

Hi. Please refrain from adding bands to the "associated acts" parameter of Template:Infobox musical artist if those bands do not meet the criteria at Template:Infobox musical artist#associated_acts. I have removed your addition of several bands to Carcass's infobox as none of them fulfilled the criteria to be considered an associated act. Also, please do not remove valuable hidden notes, such as the one at Carcass which explained to only add bands that meet said criteria. Thank you. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 18:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Surgical Steel (album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at World Downfall, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned several times not to change genres without any discussion or without providing any sources. Additionally, per WP:MINOR, do not mark substantial edits (such as adding genres or bands to an infobox) as "minor". MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please read Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts and stop adding acts that don't qualify as associated acts to band articles. I have reverted your additions to Terrorizer. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Opeth page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at St. Anger, you may be blocked from editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at ...And Justice for All (album). Mlpearc (open channel) 21:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

So, what, is making contentious changes to the genre fields in infobox your whole raison d'être? Keep your mitts off My War. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 04:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You are blocked a second time for constant changing of genre without providing sources. Please see WP:REFB for how to add references, and stop ignoring these warnings or the next block will be permanent. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 02:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thrashmaniac99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thrashmaniac99. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swamped in Gore moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Swamped in Gore, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 22:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swamped in Gore (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of notability. No sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swamped in Gore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Swamped in Gore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thrashmaniac99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Swamped in Gore

Hello, Thrashmaniac99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Swamped in Gore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 22:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]