Jump to content

User talk:Thismomentisgone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: MarketVector Indexes (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs much more reliable independent sourcing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 07:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thismomentisgone! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 07:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clay Alexander (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuicoleJR was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
QuicoleJR (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bassel Ounah moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Bassel Ounah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Praxidicae, ok Thanks. Thismomentisgone (talk) 09:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fake SEO sourcing

[edit]

Stop icon You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kuru, thanks. Although, I didn't see any sponsored label or any press release tags. Can you break it down for me, how can I be vigilant in identifying such sources? Thismomentisgone (talk) 09:59, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Will you please provide the required paid editing disclosures on your user page? Sam Kuru (talk) 13:33, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already did. Thismomentisgone (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have disclosed paid editing, however, my question is still there. How can I be vigilant in identifying such sources? Thismomentisgone (talk) 20:26, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI Therapist moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to AI Therapist. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bassel Ounah moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Bassel Ounah (2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because WP:PAID cannot move the draft to mainspace themselves. Please wait for the approval.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please disclose your all paid work, not just one. Thanks. Gheus (talk) 01:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thismomentisgone&oldid=1278859766"