User talk:Therealangelo1177

Retired names

Wait until the final report comes out. The document that is accessible is just about requests and not finals. Songda Talas 22:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Typhoon Rai

Please read the report carefully before editing the page if the system was decommissioned, thank you. HurricaneEdgar 03:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! HurricaneEdgar 10:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Damages template for Infobox weather event.

I noticed that you have been typing the input for the damages parameter like this:

| damages = $2.12 billion (2011 [[USD]])

Instead, I would appreciate if you wrote them like this:

| year = 2011
...
| damages = 2120000000

The year template exists for that reason, so I'd like you to use them as intended. Thanks! TheBigBookOfNaturalScience 📖 (💬/📜) 11:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subtropical storm Don

Hi, I noticed that you removed the infobox of current information of Subtropical storm Don in the 2023 Atlantic hurricane season. Please note that the infobox is extremely important for information and images and deleting it is not appreciated. Your edit has been reverted. Insendieum (talk) 23:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 01:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Therealangelo1177! Your additions to Draft:Typhoon Haikui (2023) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2023 Pacific hurricane season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Pacific Typhoon Names

Please be sure to check which user added the content. It was an IP Adress User that added the content, without giving a description nor a source. Also, the Typhoon Committee 56th session website is still under member access only, so please check the most recent session website to see if there is anything to support what a user added. Also, where the IP Adress edited Conson, I believe that Luc-binh is actually a name suggested by Hong Kong in a session some years ago, and not a Vietnamese name. The pages where I reverted your edits were Tropical Storm Conson (2021), Typhoon Hinnamnor, and the 2022 Pacific typhoon season. Songda Talas 00:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Therealangelo1177 (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forget about the Luc-binh part Songda Talas 17:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Miss Universe Thailand 2023, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please do not use subnational flags per MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE. Sciencefish (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Miss Universe 2018, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read MOS:BOLD before bolding in articles. Sciencefish (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2012 Pacific typhoon season, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Stating that the 2012 PTS had an ACE index of 304.33 and is the fifth costliest season on record is Original Research. Jason Rees (talk) 22:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Typhoon Khanun (2023), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please cite a source before re-edit the page. HurricaneEdgar 13:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe Colombia 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazonas Department. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Miss Universe Philippines 2024. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop adding bold to articles per MOS:BOLD Sciencefish (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Therealangelo1177. You have new messages at Talk:Mister and Miss Supranational Thailand.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit summaries, again

I see you were asked above, some time ago, to add edit summaries every time you save a change. But you don't do it for the majority of your edits. Please review the directions and cooperate with the norms of the community in this regard. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Grand International 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampong Chhnang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-national flags

Please read MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE. Sub-national flags are rarely appropriate in Wikipedia articles, probably never in a pageant article like you added here. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't reply here but I got notified by the software that you reverted me in several places and added flags back in again. I'm adding it to the ANI case (WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Therealangelo1177 disruption, reverting/restoring bad content in beauty pageant articles). You should be aware that both failure to communicate, and editing in contravention of community standards (one of which is MOS) are considered disruptive and can result in a block. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even though you consider those countries (ex. Curacao, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, etc.) a territory of another country, the flags should also be there to represent their respective countries. You can see that in the past editions of beauty pageants, there are a lot of pageant articles that put a flag despite not being recognized in the list of all the countries. Removing the country flag there in the table would not be the same as per MOS:SOVEREIGNFLAG. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I just wanted to ask if you could please cite and archive the sources that you use to update the season articles. Oftentimes, many of your contributions don't include a supporting source or aren't archived via Internet Archive or archive.ph. It would be more convenient for other editors as they'll have to try to find the source before it gets overridden by new info. OhHaiMark (talk) 03:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting back unsourced material

When you revert another editor with an edit summary like (summarizing you here) "this was important to include", you are responsible for making sure the material has proper sources, just as if you had written it yourself. Could you keep that in mind and consider adding a source where I provided a link? Otherwise it is still failing WP:V and can be removed again. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced section in the article doesn't mean that you should remove some information right away. Viewers might not know who made it to the semifinalists, finalists, and the winner of the pageant if you remove that table. The editors worked so hard to create a table for the contestants who made it to the first cut. By adding this (Template:Unreferenced section), should be enough to put that in a section where is unreferenced. Just in case, unless someone can put a reliable source to support it.

Also, relating to a source that only supports the runners-up and the titleholder of the pageant edition doesn't mean you should remove the semi-finalists. It took me a while to find a source that can be reliable, verifiable, and related to the unreferenced section. In this way, that section will not be removed. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect. Any editor may remove unsourced claims right away, this is exactly what WP:BURDEN says. Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. Particularly when they involve living persons.

Lately as a courtesy I have been tagging unsourced sections of pageants and waiting a couple of weeks to a month before removing material. But this is not required. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but there are some times seeing a message in the top center that reverting someone's change to add something or add a reliable source cannot be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits like what it said there. Doing it manually may take a while or may not know who made it to the first cut. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you are saying you are deliberately reintroducing the unreferenced material because it will be difficult to restore deleted tables, later. That's not a good reason. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing some information there that is unreferenced may find it not productive or helpful. It is not right to do that. Try finding a reliable source of yourself that can have an inline citation to a reliable source instead of just removing information. In this way, this will support it to the part where is unreferenced.

I am doing it so hard just to have a reliable source to each of the unreferenced sections. Therealangelo1177 (talk) 03:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mister Supranational 2024. Stop adding back material that has been clearly marked as unsourced. Sciencefish (talk) 08:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Track maps

Do not ever insert old-colored maps, even if there is no new-colored map yet, per WP:ACCESSIBILITY, as you did here. Doing so discourages the making of a new-colored map as well. Jasper Deng (talk) 10:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi, as you edit Miss Cosmo 2024 to change the font and your reason for readability please see the use of small in 95% tables per MOS:SMALLFONT. 🌼𝓡𝓬 𝓡𝓪𝓶𝔃🍁 (talk) 02:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]