User talk:The C of E/Archive 5
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Your DYK nom of The Three Kings includes a link to a dab page
Hi, I'm not doing the DYK review of your nomination., but when I was adding mine I saw your hook includes a link to Epiphany which is a dab page (its also in the article) - I presume that is not intentional, but I don't know which article it should be linking to.— Rod talk 09:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Possible New Page
Hello! I have been directed here by Cwmhiraeth, to ask if you would co-operate with me in writing a new football article and nominate it for DYK (as apparently you tend to do that), so we can both get some WikiCup points! Thanks, Tube Geek 77 (talk) 21:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC) PS my idea was a bout the moth infestation before the Euro 2016 final.
DYK for The Three Kings
On 6 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Three Kings, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Epiphany anthem "The Three Kings" describes the visit of the Biblical Magi to the baby Jesus (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Three Kings. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Three Kings), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of 1953 Alcoa Aluminum advertisement
Hello! Your submission of 1953 Alcoa Aluminum advertisement at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
About Athletic de Bilbao signing policy
Dear The C of E, I saw you undid an edit of mine that questioned "ethnicity" being a factor in the Athletic signing policy. I have provided some links that in my opinion support it's not (the key factor being the origin club of the player). We are discussing it in the talk page, [[1]]. Could you please comment the issue with us? Thank you! Eleder (talk) 15:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Derry City Ladies F.C.
On 22 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Derry City Ladies F.C., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Derry City Ladies F.C. play football in the Northern Irish leagues while their men's team play in the Republic of Ireland's? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Derry City Ladies F.C.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Derry City Ladies F.C.), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Church of England Marriage Measure 2008
On 23 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Church of England Marriage Measure 2008, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Church of England Marriage Measure 2008 gave couples the legal right to get married in any parish where their parents or grandparents were married, but not in any cathedral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Church of England Marriage Measure 2008. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Church of England Marriage Measure 2008), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for PSNI GAA
On 25 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PSNI GAA, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that for security purposes, Gaelic games club PSNI GAA players do not have their names published? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PSNI GAA. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, PSNI GAA), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Irish Guards GAA
On 30 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Irish Guards GAA, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2015, the Irish Guards GAA became the first British Army Gaelic games club to join the Gaelic Athletic Association? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Irish Guards GAA. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Irish Guards GAA), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Collaboration request
Hi The C of E, came across the new article on Antonín Cyril Stojan, which I feel could be suitable for DYK. I have done some work on it, but not sure if it is quite ready. I will go ahead and nominate it soon, but would appreciate any input which you may be able to give while the initial seven days elapse. Of course it's eligible for the WikiCup too. So please consider it. Thanks, C679 14:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter No.2
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg/120px-Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg.png)
- A HUGE backlog
We now have 821 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ae/New_Pages_backlog_2016_-5_Feb_2017.jpg/350px-New_Pages_backlog_2016_-5_Feb_2017.jpg)
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
- Second set of eyes
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
- Abuse
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
- this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
- this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
- This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.
Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The C of E, there has been a response to the issues you raised in this review. Please return as soon as you can to resume the review, or ping me here to let me know if you don't plan on returning to it. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Presidential M&M's
On 12 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Presidential M&M's, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Presidential M&M's are given as gifts to guests of the President of the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Presidential M&M's. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Presidential M&M's), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
ENGVAR
See Talk:Presidential_M&M's#American_English. HalfGig talk 14:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Very sorry that removal happened to you but at least it got flipped back fairly soon. HalfGig talk 15:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hi, congratulations for your work at Presidential M&M's and for promoting it to DYK. Great article, keep up the amazing work! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 16:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC) |
thought it might amuse you...
I took a look at your user page and played the sound file at the top. I was about ten seconds from pointing out to you that horrible vandalism of your user page (to place a patriotic American song on the user page of such an obviously patriotic British editor) when it occurred to me that a lot of patriotic American songs have stolen their melodies from elsewhere. At which point I promptly remembered hearing this before, in the Olympics.
Just doing my duty to spread the 'Murikan way of life. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 21:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
On 19 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells is a term given to people, traditionally ascribed as being from Royal Tunbridge Wells, who write letters of incensed conservative moral outrage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Cute article, especially since I'm an uncultured American. I am, however, confused by this line:
"Although most Americans would not fully understand the reference, the town—which was the only council area in Kent to vote by a majority for Remain—was nonetheless considered to be a symbol of middle England."
Is it referring to Brexit or something? Cheers. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 09:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Deckiller: It was supposed to refer to Americans not understanding what "Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells" meant as per the source, the stuff about being the only area in Kent to vote remain was added by someone else and not by me which I think did break up the intent of the sentence. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Everything seems to relate to Brexit these days...but I digress. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 10:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter No.3
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg/120px-Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg.png)
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
- Still a MASSIVE backlog
We now have 821 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017) for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Grondemar 15:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for 2017 EFL Cup Final
On 26 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2017 EFL Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Southampton reached the 2017 EFL Cup Final against Manchester United today without conceding a goal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2017 EFL Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2017 EFL Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Tomahawk chop
Hello! Your submission of Tomahawk chop at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2017 WikiCup newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:
Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.
The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.
So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Assembly Members (Reduction of Numbers) Act (Northern Ireland) 2016
On 2 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Assembly Members (Reduction of Numbers) Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Northern Ireland Assembly will lose 18 MLAs because of the Assembly Members (Reduction of Numbers) Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, effective at the snap election today? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Assembly Members (Reduction of Numbers) Act (Northern Ireland) 2016. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Assembly Members (Reduction of Numbers) Act (Northern Ireland) 2016), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 11:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
The article Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 18:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for The U.D.I. Song
On 11 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The U.D.I. Song, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Rhodesian folk song "The U.D.I. Song" was written by a Northern Rhodesian and first performed by a South African? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The U.D.I. Song. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The U.D.I. Song), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017)
On 11 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lincoln City's win over Burnley meant that they became the first non-league football club to reach the FA Cup quarter-finals in 103 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Home Run Apple
Hello! Your submission of Home Run Apple at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Manchester Gorton by-election, 2017
On 12 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Manchester Gorton by-election, 2017, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2017 Manchester Gorton by-election was called after the death of the Father of the House? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manchester Gorton by-election, 2017. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Manchester Gorton by-election, 2017), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
R. v. Gowan
I've addressed your concerns here: Template:Did you know nominations/R. v. Gowan. Futurist110 (talk) 00:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- I've responded again there in response to your latest comment there. Futurist110 (talk) 20:03, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Reich Ministry of Transport
![]() | On 12 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reich Ministry of Transport, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that despite the Reich Ministry of Transport running trains to extermination camps during the Holocaust, the US later ruled some of their personnel only had "lukewarm" connections to the Nazi Party? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reich Ministry of Transport. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
The article Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 22:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for South African Defence Force Ensign
On 21 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South African Defence Force Ensign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the South African National Defence Force initially used the South African Defence Force Ensign (pictured), which contained the former flag of South Africa, despite the adoption of a new national flag? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South African Defence Force Ensign. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, South African Defence Force Ensign), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Field goal (rugby)
On 22 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Field goal (rugby), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that field goals in rugby union, which were worth the same number of points as tries, were abolished in 1905? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Field goal (rugby). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Field goal (rugby)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Southern Rhodesia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Flag of Southern Rhodesia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HaEr48 -- HaEr48 (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Southern Rhodesia
The article Flag of Southern Rhodesia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Flag of Southern Rhodesia for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HaEr48 -- HaEr48 (talk) 18:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Consolation prize
![]() |
In lieu of a DYK |
If you can't have a DYK, you still can have a Barnstar. Good effort. This is not a prediction on the outcome of the discussions. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC) |
You and I have been accused of collusion. Didn't happen. I deny it. And am mad as hell. But you should be aware. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- I guess that's what happens when you see a "comprehensive QPQ review" concluded within 12 minutes of a nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- How hard is any of that? Is there a question about that too? You saying there wasn't a QPQ? Prove it. Fucking witch hunt. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Only just noticed this vile response. No, I didn't say there wasn't a QPQ. Read it properly. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- It was appropriate in more ways than one. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Only just noticed this vile response. No, I didn't say there wasn't a QPQ. Read it properly. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- How hard is any of that? Is there a question about that too? You saying there wasn't a QPQ? Prove it. Fucking witch hunt. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Fucking sign at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 04:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
QPQ?
Thank you for looking at my DYK nomination, but what is a QPQ please? Alansplodge (talk) 11:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I'll give it a bash later. Alansplodge (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- QPQ now done for Template:Did you know nominations/SS Tyndareus. Thanks for your patience, I was waiting for an easy one! Alansplodge (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Robert Rinder
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Rinder, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Judge Rinder is not a judge? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Rinder. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert Rinder), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Londonderry Borough Police
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Londonderry Borough Police, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that thrust into a difficult situation, Horney Dicks failed to satisfy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Londonderry Borough Police. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Londonderry Borough Police), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Wayne Shaw (footballer)
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wayne Shaw (footballer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Roly Poly Goalie ate all the pies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wayne Shaw (footballer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wayne Shaw (footballer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Robin Hood v. United States
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robin Hood v. United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robin Hood sued the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robin Hood v. United States. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robin Hood v. United States), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for The Winker's Song (Misprint)
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Winker's Song (Misprint), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a song about masturbation was written by Ivor Biggun and recommended by Johnny Rotten? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Winker's Song (Misprint). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Winker's Song (Misprint)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for 1953 Alcoa Aluminum advertisement
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1953 Alcoa Aluminum advertisement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a woman can open a bottle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1953 Alcoa Aluminum advertisement. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1953 Alcoa Aluminum advertisement), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Tal's Hill
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tal's Hill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that baseball players fall down on the Grassy Knoll? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tal's Hill. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tal's Hill), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Mount Davis (Oakland)
On 3 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mount Davis (Oakland), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Oakland Athletics' management refuses to remove the tarp from Mount Davis (pictured) unless the team reaches the World Series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mount Davis (Oakland). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mount Davis (Oakland)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Home Run Apple
On 4 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Home Run Apple, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New York Mets fans once booed the Home Run Apple for over two minutes because it was not raised for a Mets home run? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Home Run Apple. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Home Run Apple), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flag of Southern Rhodesia
The article Flag of Southern Rhodesia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Flag of Southern Rhodesia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HaEr48 -- HaEr48 (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for making that change. I'm a bit hesitant to put this in the lead slot, since we had Mount Davis (Oakland) on April 2 and also ran your Home Run Apple hook on April 3. While I'm a big baseball fan, not everyone at DYK is. Yoninah (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oh. Now I see on your talk page that Mount Davis got over 20,000 hits. Wow! And the Chicago Cubs are reigning world champions. So I will move it up ... Yoninah (talk) 21:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Big A Sign
On 7 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Big A Sign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the halo on the Big A Sign (pictured) lights up to tell passing motorists of a Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim baseball win? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Big A Sign. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Big A Sign), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Wrigley Field ivy
On 11 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wrigley Field ivy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that any baseballs that get hit and lodged in the Wrigley Field ivy (pictured) score the batter a double? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wrigley Field ivy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wrigley Field ivy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Take Up Thy Cross, The Saviour Said
On 14 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Take Up Thy Cross, The Saviour Said, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Good Friday hymn "Take Up Thy Cross, The Saviour Said" was one of two American works included in the Church of England's Hymns Ancient and Modern? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Take Up Thy Cross, The Saviour Said. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Take Up Thy Cross, The Saviour Said), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |