User talk:Textorus/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Re: Thanks!

No problem, anytime! Brianga 06:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On August 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article adult interdependent relationship in Alberta, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

On August 6, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article LGBT rights in Colombia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HI again and well done. With respect to a complaint against your nomination already being 1500 chars before expansion, please note that in practice, myself and most of the other admins interpret the regulations as being a 5X expansion, irrespective of the starting legnth, so that most of the stuff is effectively new. So don't be afraid of nominating. I will even let in stuff which is 4.5X etc if the rest is good. Happy editing, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the DYK and the feedback. I saw one comment and decided there was no point saying anything more. In any case, how do you figure out how many characters an article has? On the history pages, I see "bytes" but not "characters." Anyway, appreciate your kind remarks.--Textorus 09:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh, one character is one byte in computing terms, but usually, I check the article characters in terms of the text and not the whole code, which the article history measures. To get the chararacters of whichever section you want to measure, simply copy into MS word. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 09:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Scott Allen Caplan

While I agree with everything you said -- and has only gotten worse since the time I tagged it -- unfortunately it falls outside the speedy deletion criteria, which covers those people who make no assertion of notability. Admins have been known to stretch the definition occasionally in common-sense cases (people claiming to have won Nobel Prizes or to have invented cheese, for example), but this probably isn't one of them. At this stage, a {{PROD}} (proposed deletion) tag is called for, and if that's removed, the Articles for Deletion process. --Calton | Talk 06:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

A messenge from ze leader...

Lol, I wasn't aware royalty was elected. :) You know, the major problem with being both female and bi is that you miss out on all the great humour. Swathes of arse and dyke jokes and stereotypes about drag and dungarees just cut off. What do I get? "I'm not gay, but my girlfriend is!". Ugh.

Btw, I love the way you find an article and think, "Golly, this article is dreadful! I'll just spruce it up a bit..." and then we take a look at it later and you've accomplished in a few hours what it takes some a week. :D Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 09:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Adminship.

Um, no. Not going through that again. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Ummm...whaaaa?

OK, just because you are the second editor who read something in a comment I made that was so incredibly not intended, I wanted to ask you why you thought I was 'slyly chiding' you. I was doing nothing of the sort :(. Seriously, though, because it kinda upsets me that other editors would think this from comments I generally deem very benign when I write them. CaveatLector^Talk 00:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your apology, and I'm sorry as well if my comment came across as patronizing, this definitely was not my intention. It is obvious that you have put a lot of time and effort into the work in question, and I think one of the things I can do is be sure to check an editor's history before making any comments directed at them. Thanks for understanding, and let me know if you would like collaboration working on these articles or this information. As you can tell, it's a subject I'm very interested in :). CaveatLector^Talk 01:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Your Greek Love Sandbox

Something told me I should've copied the information you had there. Would it be too much too ask if you could copy and paste the info to my talk page? PLEASE! --Avazina 23:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank You for the Info. --Avazina 01:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Notice of Inactivity

In trying to deliver the LGBT Project newsletter, SatyrBot detected a period of three months of inactivity from this account. You have been placed in our "Inactive Members" section. If this has been done in error, please let my bot owner know and change your status in he project. Thanks! SatyrBot (talk) 23:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Greenville, North Carolina

Hey, just wanted to let you know some of the info you added to the LGBT section of Greenville is info dealing with Greenville, South Carolina, not North Carolina. I removed that part and replaced it with the info about the current club. Don't worry though, I used to live there and people would call my office and think they were talking to someone in SC. haha. Cheers.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 05:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5