User talk:Tengu99

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Tengu99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- MrDolomite 05:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citing Sources

To help cleanup the article Russian Expeditionary Force in France, check out Wikipedia:Citing_sources and Wikipedia:Citations_quick_reference. It looks like you did all the hard work finding sources and noting them in the article, now it is just a matter of making the wiki links work. Check out U.S. I Armored Corps. I have probably overdone it a bit :) but it is hopefully it is easy to see how the < ref > tags work with the Notes section at the bottom -- MrDolomite 05:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Firearms

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF 21:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

M-1 Carbine Article

The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look?Sf46 (talk) 19:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graf & Sons

A tag has been placed on Graf & Sons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Graf & Sons and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Justpassin (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tengu99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is Hazbin Hotel a web series or not?

I thought I'd add my two cents here. Hazbin was arguably a web series, but since it will likely be released on a streaming service, it falls under streaming television (or it will once it is on such a streaming platform). This is in contrast to Medrano's Helluva Boss which released on YouTube, which can be called web series more accurately. --Historyday01 (talk) 13:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YaG-10 (artillery)

Hello Tengu99,

as you might have not noticed, there are allready articles about this anti-aircraft-gun in other languages. The russians refer to it as 76 mm self-propelled anti-aircraft weapon 29-K or, in russian, 76-мм зенитная самоходная установка 29-К. YaG-10 is only the truck and therefore not the propper title of the page. A reliable source (russian literature) would be for example Е. Д. Кочнев, Автомобили Красной Армии 1918 — 1945., — М.. : Яуза: Эксмо, 2009. — С. 311. Maybe you can move the page one more time? I would correct some of the remainig links that clearly refer to the weapon and not the truck after that.

Regards, --Druschba 4 (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problems with calling it by a more proper name. Would it be alright to just translate and copy this page (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/29%D0%9A)? Looks like I'd need to add "Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution" to the top?

Also, can you direct me to any pages with more info about 4M (artillery?

Thank you for your help :) Tengu99 (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the 4M (artillery): There is an russian article about the weapon system at ru:Зенитная пулемётная установка М4 образца 1931 года. It was mounted on serveral vehicles and also stationary, for example on buildings. See also commons:Category:Quadruple-mounted Maxim anti-aircraft machine gun. I personally highly doupt the number of 3000 GAZ-AAA equiped with it, especailly since a 2 ton truck would be quite an overkill for a 500 kg machine gun. Today, we would consider that thing most likely as a Technical (vehicle). The 3000 might be the number of guns produced in total. The GAZ-AAA trucks were rare compared to the GAZ-AA (two-axle chassis, 1.5 ton truck) and mainly used for pulling heavy equipment due to the better traction of the 6x4. And it was used as a chassis for much heavier weapons like a 76.2 mm gun (but also only a very low number). I personally would decripe the weapon system more in detail and leave out douptful information about the chassis used.

There are some sources in the russian article that might help you. English pages about model trucks are usually not really reliable.

You can translate the russian page for the 29K, if you want. You can use Template:Translated page on the talk page. A how-to is on the page there. Regards, --Druschba 4 (talk) 15:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, 3,000 seems like way too many, I'll delete that. Most likely it's talking about the quad mount itself. Thanks again! :) Tengu99 (talk) 18:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4M (artillery)

Thanks for the article on 4M (artillery) You have used bare references and I wanted to suggest that you formate the references. See MOS:CITEFORMAT for ideas. Thanks and keep on writing articles! Bruxton (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gebauer 1934.M GKM

Hello, Tengu99

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Gebauer 1934.M GKM, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 14:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gebauer 1934.M GKM for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gebauer 1934.M GKM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gebauer 1934.M GKM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 04:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will post objection to the deletion on the nomination page. I misunderstood the directions and thought I was supposed to delete that tag first then propose why on the talk page. Tengu99 (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kamov A-7

Hello, Tengu99,

Thank you for creating Kamov A-7.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Your article is largely uncited and only has one bare url reference. It is coming up as a copyright violation. I think it should be moved to draft so that you can get it ready.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 19:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruxton:First I've heard of The Teahouse. Thanks! :) Tengu99 (talk) 01:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work

I know nothing of Soviet floaty drone copters from the 40s but I *love* that we have someone working on that. Bravo you. jengod (talk) 02:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, thanks. :) Tengu99 (talk) 23:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of .375 Whelen

The article .375 Whelen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Marked unreferenced for years. Unlike other ammunition with their own articles, I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject outside of lists, online forums and other types of wikis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 5.6×39mm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sako. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tengu99. Thank you for your work on Junovicz P.A.1. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a nice day today. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article. As your article have adhered to the policies of Wikipedia, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a good day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tengu99. Thank you for your work on Chicago Helicopter Airways. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Greetings! I trust you're having a wonderful day. I wanted to express my gratitude for your valuable contribution to Wikipedia through your article. I'm delighted to inform you that your article has successfully met Wikipedia's guidelines, and as a result, I have reviewed and marked it accordingly. Wishing you and your family a fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mieczysław Dębicki moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mieczysław Dębicki. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Ibjaja055}} Could you give me some more information about needing more sources? It has 5 at the moment. What would you consider sufficient?Tengu99 (talk) 21:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tengu99 Thank you very much for reaching out. I would have respond earlier but you didn't tag me very well. I see that the article has potential and I wanted to make sure that it stays. I have rework and I have submitted it at AFC. Pls help to add more references even from your language. It will assist the article to pass AFC. Thank you Ibjaja055 (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tengu99. Thank you for your work on Tatra T-III. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:Thanks! :) !Tengu99 (talk) 01:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tengu99. Thank you for your work on Gábor Sztehlo. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the good work on a very cool biography!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 17:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moriwen:Thanks! :) Tengu99 (talk) 11:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Tengu99. Thank you for your work on 75 mm Schneider-Danglis 06/09. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thanks! :) Tengu99 (talk) 17:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]