User talk:Talleyrand6

Welcome!

Hello, Talleyrand6! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Talleyrand6! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! DHSchool2003Student (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archived Sections

All of the sections I just archived can be found here at User talk:Talleyrand6/Archive 1 DHSchool2003Student (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		Thank you for the superb and high quality maps you've created. From the US, to Italy , to Australia—your map making skills are highly appreciated and make this site much better. Here's to more fantastic work 🍻! Aficionado538 (talk) 23:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aficionado538 (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 Swiss Federal election Council.svg

Hello. Could you fix this image, as it has "2022" at the top. Also, could you remove the parliamentary diagram, as it's unnecessary. Cheers, Number 5 7 22:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, the chart stays.

But I will renumber. Talleyrand6 (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The chart is already in the article in the results table – there's no need to have it twice. There was recently a discussion about infobox maps becoming unnecessarily complex, and this is one of the things that contributes towards that. Please remove it. If it's not removed, then I will remove the maps and replace them with simpler ones like File:Elections federales suisses 2019 Conseil national.svg. Thanks, Number 5 7 01:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure, there might be some "discussion" promoting simpler maps (which I've seen absolutely none of, and in fact quite a lot of discussion supporting higher quality maps), but I must say that threatening to replace a pretty nice map all things considered (well, duh, I made it) with a pretty low quality map is certainly a thing one can do. It's quite a comical idea to me, to be honest. I'll concede that the chart is actually quite redundant in the grand scheme of the article, so I'll remove it. Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2020 PA

We gave it our best fight patriot but the feds caught us eventually o7 Ohaiyoan124 (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Literally 1984 Talleyrand6 (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Saw it on Twitter, congrats. 沁水湾 (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. Thanks for your recent edit at 2024 British Columbia general election. I am not sure if the party will release riding specific data concerning the 2024 Alberta New Democratic Party leadership election. If so, that might be an article that could use your expertise, should you have the time and interest in the topic. Of course, it is three months away before we will have any results. Anyway, happy editing.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Map Style

Oh my gosh, I absolutely loved the new U.S. Presidential Election map style you created. It's so good, and I hope others can see what I saw in the style. Thank you so much for sharing!! Lostfan333 (talk) 23:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 02:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the block is due to off-site canvasing that was brought to my attention in my role as a CU. I am willing to share the information with any functionary who wishes to review the blocks per policy. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 02:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CUs may want to see ticket:2024061710001045 -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 03:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talleyrand6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll make this brief. As I understand I was placed on thin ice. All of my actions over the last few days have kept that in mind. Nothing that I have done or am suspected of doing has been with the intent of further breaking Wikipedia rules. That said, I want to challenge the block on the grounds that these are unfair assertions. I have not and did not disruptively edit over the course of this conflict. I made one edit this entire time and it was to the 1988 French Legislative Election and I did so fully within my right and fully within Wikipedia guidelines. Secondly, I want to see evidence of me having canvased anyone for their support in any action for the events which took place today or yesterday. If you appeal to my Twitter page, I will report that there has been no canvassing on my part. All of my posts were made in good faith in order to document this dispute on Wikipedia to other users on that website. I ask for due process to know where I went wrong with my documentation and I kindly ask to know on what grounds you you believe that to be canvassing. Again, despite aspirations to my character and my previous ban, I wish to say that nothing was done knowingly in violation of any Wikipedia rules. If they were so, it was without my knowing. Wishing for a swift resolution, yours in editing, Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm referring this block back to ArbCom to investigate the off-wiki harassment and canvassing allegations. – bradv 17:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talleyrand6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can one of you please review my block here. Like literally just anything. Just respond. I want due process. Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One request at a time please. – bradv 17:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

-- Maxim (talk) 18:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Motion for arbitration

You are involved in a recently proposed case for arbitration. You can review the motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Historical elections. If you wish to do so, you may submit a statement and any other material to the Arbitration Committee by email at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use. SilverLocust 💬 20:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, House Blaster (talk · he/they) 00:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed decision in the Historical elections case posted

Hi Talleyrand6, in the open Historical elections arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. You can bring comments to the attention of the committee by email at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. (Others may bring comments to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page.) For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 14:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections closed

The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections has now closed, and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

The results of any national or sub-national election are a Contentious Topic. Starting in 2026 and checked yearly afterwards, this designation expires on 1 January if no sanctions have been logged in the preceding 2 years.
The regular posters on X who associate with Election Twitter are reminded that there is no ownership of articles on the English Wikipedia. They are encouraged to seek consensus on the article talk page, use dispute resolution when they encounter disagreements and refrain from off-site coordination.
The Arbitration Committee block of Talleyrand6 (talk · contribs) is converted to an indefinite ban from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Anonymousioss (talk · contribs) is topic banned from national and sub-national elections. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Anonymousioss is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
CroatiaElects (talk · contribs) is topic banned from national and sub-national elections. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
CroatiaElects is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
DemocraticLuntz (talk · contribs) is topic banned from national and sub-national elections. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Mcleanm302 (talk · contribs) is topic banned from national and sub-national elections. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Mcleanm302 is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.

For the Arbitration Committee, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 18:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections closed