Jump to content

User talk:Struway2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Struway)

1,000 Destubbing Challenge

[edit]

Hi Struway2 - I hope your doing well. If you get a moment, would it be okay if you could contribute an article or two (or few) towards Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/The 1000 Destubbing Challenge? We're so close to reaching the goal - I've been doing a lot of it by myself but it's really long overdue that I ask for help xD - no worries if you can't! RossEvans19 (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing

[edit]

Can you stop changing my wiki page when I have updated it please Pdfc2025 (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfie Chang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Worcester.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

[edit]

You have made two claims without citing the relevant policy. The first one is that Closer is a celebrity gossip magazine. I think you have to distinguish between "news" and "gossip". For example, the London Times has news items and also a gossip column, clearly labelled as such. Again, a "gossip magazine" (to use your derogatory phrase) will be very careful to check the factual accuracy of its news items, not least because of the danger of being sued for defamation by the celebrities concerned should information be wrong. The magazine's publisher also publishes TV Choice, Motor Cycle News, Parker's Car Guide, Australian Women's Weekly, Harper's Bazaar, Better Homes and Gardens, Men's Health and Women's Health. Are you suggesting these are unreliable sources? On forums, you claim no forum is a reliable source. Are you quoting policy or is that just your opinion? By their nature, forums are contributed to by people who are specialist in the subject and know what they're talking about, and posts will be quickly called out by others if they contain inaccuracies. 91.234.214.10 (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've just spotted your comment on my talk page. First thoughts: quite rightly policy takes exception to people talking about other people on their social media feed, or a blog they produce, or their website, or a podcast they have put out, or a self-published book where they pay the publisher to publish what they write. Not sure what a "zine" is - I've not encountered the term before. This must be distinguished from moderated sources - e.g. a publisher who reads the manuscript and checks it for accuracy, or academics who post to a forum where the brainstorming can produce useful insights. Pie and Bovril is a forum for soccer enthusiasts, and enthusiasts know an awful lot about their subject. I would imagine it is well known in Dumfries that Lyndon and Victoria are cousins - if that wasn't true one of them would have been quick to say so. 91.234.214.10 (talk) 12:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KRO

[edit]

I was listening to Colin Murray too! Thought I'd take advantage to add a couple of links. Thanks for the thanks.  :)

Now, if only I could find evidence of Aston Shakespeare's colours... In Vitrio (talk) 11:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]