User talk:Stratospheric78

This is Stratospheric78's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fort Duurstede Expedition (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I can't read this (severe grammar problems), and a Wikipedia article should be readable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fort Duurstede Expedition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 07:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stratospheric78! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 07:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i will do to fixed my article thank you for the critique of my article Stratospheric78 (talk) 16:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Stratospheric78, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! QuicoleJR (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Stratospheric78 (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Stratospheric78. Thank you for your work on Bombing of Manado. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much Stratospheric78 (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Stratospheric78. Thank you for your work on Operation Pagar Betis. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You welcome sir Stratospheric78 (talk) 10:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User:Kibbutz1967 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Specifically, you should not place user block templates on pages of users who are not blocked. ([1], [2]). Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Battle of Long Jawai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

first of all im probably thanks at your information about the sockpupperty but i need to fixed Long Jawai results with neutral result because the Indonesian also claimed the inital victory before the british countered their attack so the results that i used was initial indonesia victory and commonwealth counter attack victory Stratospheric78 (talk) 10:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The place to report suspect sock puppets is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations or WP:SPI. You may find an existing sock puppet investigation, for example, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mesbmr6710. When you report suspected sock puppets, please provide evidence showing why you think that they are a sock puppet.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raid on Kalabakan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

skibidi Wikidude2243 (talk) 10:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	nice job Wikidude2243 (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Operation Mena. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]