User talk:Ss112/Archive 2
Pink Floyd
[edit]Hi, I posted a question about your changes on Talk:Pink Floyd discography and hope you will reply on that page, as it will be of interest to anyone who watches that article. Thanks. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 14:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that you have added some more Australian chart positions and have cited Australian Chart Books 1940-2005. Is this more than one book? If so, can you specifically add which one covers which chart positions. It would also be useful if you could add the publisher, publisher's location and ISBN(s) to the reference as well. Is there a specific reason for the note in the reference about pre-1989 information? --JD554 (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- In that case, I don't think the note is necessary. The link at the top of the columns is to ARIA Charts where it mentions about the Kent Music Report. Thanks for the help in getting the rest of the information for the reference, --JD554 (talk) 11:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikiproject Tool Newsletter 3
[edit]Message from the My Chemical Romance task force
[edit]Hello!
You may be interested to know that the WikiProject My Chemical Romance has recently been transformed into a task force of WikiProject Emo. Please visit the task force page to see what's new. This move allies the task force with a larger WikiProject that handles much of the administrative overload, thus allowing task force members to focus on the most important activity: article improvement.
The project's membership list has also been moved to the new task force page. If you see that your username is in the "Inactive/former members" section, please do not take offense; this is because you no longer appear to be active on Wikipedia. We may also take the liberty of removing the member userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:My Chemical Romance task force members. Of course you are free to rejoin the task force and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active again.
For active editors, it is our hope that this change will help spur you to improve articles related to My Chemical Romance. You may have noticed that the old My Chemical Romance project userbox on your user page has automatically changed to the new task force userbox. We may take the liberty of fixing the template link on your userpage, to avoid redirects.
Thank you and we hope you will continue to support the My Chemical Romance task force!
You are receiving this message because you have previously identified yourself as a member of WikiProject My Chemical Romance, either because your name appeared on the project's Participants page or because you have placed the project userbox on your user page. As a courtesy, if you have left the project, retired from Wikipedia, or simply no longer wish to be an active member of the task force, please remove the userbox from your user page. This will remove you from Category:My Chemical Romance task force members and help the task force to keep its active membership list up-to-date. |
--IllaZilla (talk) 01:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Jackson projects
[edit]Please comment here, a debate on the future of WP:MJJ and WP:JANET. — R2 14:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, could you please comment here and watchlist the article for a few weeks. Cheers. — R2 16:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
BEP
[edit]Hey. Can you please possibly give me the link to the ARIA charts, as I cant find anything for the week commencing June 15 (my friends bday XD). Thanks -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 08:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
List of best-selling singles by year Australia
[edit]Hello, as a contributing editor to the article, I invite you to read and respond to the issues I have raised at Talk: List of best-selling singles by year Australia. Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
A well deserved pat on the back
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | ||
I noticed the nice fix-ups that you recently did on some Kiss related pages, then looked back on your body of work...this is long overdue. J04n(talk page) 15:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, thanks for adding the Australian chart positions. Unfortunately you didn't add a citation, so with the discography being FL-class, I've removed them for the time being. If you could provide a full citation so we can comply with WP:V, that would be great. Thanks again, --JD554 (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
heya, you noted on this article that the music video section is incomplete and that their were more. what were they? myself and others have scoured the net to try and find evidence before and couldnt find anything? thanks Mister sparky (talk) 22:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Source
[edit]Hello. Where did you get this from? I searched ARIA official website, aCharts, australian-charts... nothing about this song. Where did you get this peak from?--12345abcxyz20082009 (talk) 09:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, fine then. I'll leave it, as the sites should update their peaks today. --12345abcxyz20082009 (talk) 09:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
GA reassessment of Fall Out Boy
[edit]I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Fall Out Boy/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
A favour?
[edit]heya, hows you? just wanted to ask you a favour? was wondering if you could either dig up or point me in the direction of the chart history of UB40 in australia? i'm working on their discography article and the only info i can find is that only 3 of their albums charted, surely there must be more. thanks! :) Mister sparky (talk) 22:32, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
The Very Very Best of Crowded House
[edit]Hi and thanks for your numerous improvements to the article I created, much appreciated. By the way, is there an online resource/archive for Australian chart positions for singles and albums before the late 80's? Thanks, Ian. Iangurteen (talk) 08:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Since when does having a readable page make it grammatically correct? I reverted the IP edit because the punctuation goes before the apostrophe. I should have been more clear in my edit summary. I apologize. Jayy008 (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
It's not personal preference, though. It's English grammar. Even though, people make it personal preference when they add it. To make sure, I Google'd it and the sentence comes first with the punctuation in, then you add the speech marks after. It's got nothing to do with if the page is readable either way. Just thought I'd clear this up. And oh, I didn't know other Mimi pages were like it, I'm not a frequent music editor any more, it's too much work for me to go through all her pages and sort it. Plus I'm semi-retired now. PS. Consistency only matters in an article, not every article by an artist. Jayy008 (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't know all of that. In any case, some of those on the page still need the punctuation inside. But if you want to revert my edit, I will not challenge it again. Jayy008 (talk) 15:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Editor help
[edit]Seeing as you recently edited Graduation (album), would you help me with Yokota126?, who has been making the same change to sourced content, the album's sales figure, and has not taken heed to any of my edit summaries in reverting such edits. Dan56 (talk) 02:14, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Updating chart peaks
[edit]Hi there! Just a polite reminder when updating chart peaks, which I've seen you done recently: don't forget to update access dates, as well. It may not seem like a big deal, but it's clearly incorrect to leave the reference as is for verification purposes, like was done when I updated the page for the discography of the Glee Cast. An edit summary here indicates a similar concern by another user, and it just takes a quick two seconds! Thanks! Yves (talk) 09:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
NGE episodes infobox
[edit]i dont think there is one.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Keri Hilson
[edit]Hi there, I've noticed you've edited Keri Hilson articles before. Feel free to edit and help out on her new album's article No Boys Allowed and the single Pretty Girl Rock. ozurbanmusic (talk) 10:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Please read WP:NOTBROKEN. Thanks and happy editing! Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well, it's actually 11 characters more, but the main reason for not redirecting is that one day someone might create the Australian Singles Chart article. Inevitably, we will want all of these occurences to point to this article, and it will be a hughe pain in the backside to fix all of these wrong links. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:35, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- Even if someone created the ARIA Singles Chart article, we would want Australian Singles Chart to be redirected there. And I don't think bots can recognize things as complicated as that. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Re: My Chemical Romance discography
[edit]Sorry for the confusion, I provided an explanation at at 110.33.254.64's talk page yesterday, but I really should have included it on the discography's talk page. Anyway, this is what I said: The album column in the the singles table is excluded for accessibility reasons. Ideally tables on Wikipedia should not reach the far right side of the screen to accommodate readers who have smaller screen resolutions (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (accessibility)#Resolution). Because MCR albums and songs tend to have long names, they take up a lot of space. A singles table with both long song and album names would take up the whole horizontal length of most medium sized screens, which creates accessibility issues for readers with smaller screens. To shorten the horizontal length of the singles table, the album column has been removed because it is the most expendable. – Zntrip 18:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:TimeIsTickingOut.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:TimeIsTickingOut.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Australian positions
[edit]Australian positions above 50 aren't archived by any of the standard sources for discographies. If you want to add them to discographies, please wait until they are archived in the Pandora archives (see WP:GOODCHARTS for links and explanations). When they appear there, then add them with a link to the specific archive.—Kww(talk) 13:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't done an exhaustive cleanup, just noticed yours today and recognize your userid as belonging to a generally productive editor. Certainly, we have a problem here. Please don't make it worse.—Kww(talk) 15:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
You Have Been Loved
[edit]Just noticed you were updating the Michael's singles discography recently. I don't mind myself the best quality of the GM article. Anyway, there is no information confirming that "You Have Been Loved" was released as double-A single along with "Strangest Thing" in its lead. Secondly, You Have Been Loved release is very likely an extended play that features four different songs in total. Ie. there is no reason to title it as ""You Have Been Loved" / "The Strangest Thing '97" (its cover also doesn't confirm this speculation). And for your comment left in the template: The '97' in "The Strangest Thing" differentiates it from the standard album version on Older. There's a reason why it's included. - Apart from rare cases (which were originally 7" vinyl singles), actually all singles releases include different than their album's version(s). Not mentioning that "Strangest Thing" was not previously released on single, and for that reason the "97"-note in its title is more optional than ordinary. Whatever makes you happy, anyway. Was glad to talk to you. Uzerakount (talk) 13:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:RulesAndRegulations.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:RulesAndRegulations.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Better source request for File:AntiDWombats.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AntiDWombats.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 12:46, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ss112 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Oz talk 06:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Editing the archive will not be noticed by anyone except people watching the page, the case has been closed. Alexandria (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- All that was done was an IP block. Just because an accused user does not respond does not imply if the case can or can not be closed. Hello could have been a bit more clear on why he was closing however. Alexandria (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. Its been closed. I thought it was against Wikipedia rules to edit as an IP when you already have an account. But when you update Australian chart positions, please wait until the ARIA website has been updated per WP:OR. Oz talk 22:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)