User talk:Srabanta Deb

Nomination of Dhananjaya Dasa Kathiyababa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhananjaya Dasa Kathiyababa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhananjaya Dasa Kathiyababa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dhananjay Das Kathia Baba This article has many important entries. This article has Bengali Wikipedia. Santadas Kathia Baba's only disciple is Dhananjay Das Kathia. Please do not delete it from Wikipedia. Thank you Srabanta Deb (talk) 03:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fandauk Pandit Ram High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fandauk Pandit Ram High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fandauk Pandit Ram High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Panditra High School, a traditional educational institution in the village of Nasirnagar Upazila, Brahmanbaria District, is over 100 years old, so it has been studied by many famous people from a traditional educational institution. So I would say don't remove it from Wikipedia Srabanta Deb (talk) 02:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Santadas Kathiababa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santadas Kathiababa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Sri Nimbarkacharya moved to draftspace - unreferenced

An article you recently created, Sri Sri Nimbarkacharya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kathiababa Charitable Trust

Hello Srabanta Deb,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kathiababa Charitable Trust for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dhananjay Das Kathiababa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dhananjay Das Kathiababa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir

The article Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The deity Jagannath is not Nimbarka's father

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, but this edit is not factually correct. I just want to clear that Nimbārka's father (sage Jagannath) was named after this deity. .💠245CMR💠.•^👥📜 16:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Sri Anandamayi Kali Mandir, Fandauk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sri Sri Anandamayi Kali Mandir, Fandauk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santadas Kathiababa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santadas Kathiababa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 07:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santadas Kathiyababa is a leading spiritual leader of Hinduism in India. He has temples all over the world. This article is very important. Bengali is on Wikipedia. So this edit is completely restored to its previous state. Thanks. Srabanta Deb (talk) 02:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sri Sri Nimbarkacharya

Hello, Srabanta Deb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sri Sri Nimbarkacharya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sri Sri Nimbarkacharya

Hello, Srabanta Deb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sri Sri Nimbarkacharya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santadas Kathiababa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santadas Kathiababa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance

A tag has been placed on Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:59, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance. Thanks! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Banshidas Babaji moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Banshidas Babaji, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 02:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Banshidas Babaji was a major religious leader of Hinduism. This edit is very important in Hinduism. So do not remove this edit Srabanta Deb (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't allow you to add an unreferenced "puffery/hagiography" on the Wikipedia. I've once again draftified it. Please write it neutrally and add references. Once you are done, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 02:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Banshidas Babaji has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Banshidas Babaji. Thanks! ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 02:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tara Kishore Chowdhury moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tara Kishore Chowdhury, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 10:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Thanks for contributing to the article Santadas Kathiababa. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 13:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Santadas Kathiababa. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Phuzion (talk) 13:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santadas Kathiababa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santadas Kathiababa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The registration of Santdas Kathiyababa is very important for the Nimbark community of Hinduism. He is one of the spiritual gurus of Hinduism in India. So do not delete this article. Thanks. Srabanta Deb (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The registration of Santdas Kathiyababa is very important for the Nimbark Sampradaya of Hinduism. He is one of the spiritual gurus of Hinduism in India. So do not delete this article. Thanks. Srabanta Deb (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hamsa God

I hope that you agree that Hamsa God describes the same topic as Hamsa (bird). This is known as Wikipedia:Content forking, and is generally avoided, which is why I redirected the title to the older article. Since the version you created has no sources at all, unless you provide sources, as required by our policy on verifiability I will nominate it at Articles for Deletion if you won't agree to redirect the title. The outcome of a deletion discussion is very likely to re-establish that redirect. Vexations (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Hamsa God

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hamsa God. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hamsa (bird). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hamsa (bird). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vexations (talk) 21:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hamsa God is a Hindu deity. He is one of the main deities of Hinduism. This article is very important for people of Hindu religion. Hamsa God and Hamsa bird are not one. Two different registrations. Hamsa God is the title in Bengali Wikipedia (হংস ভগবান). Therefore, in terms of consideration, the registration of Hamsa God is very important and the registration of God of all people. Another community in Hinduism is the Nimbark Sampradaya. This Hamsa God created the Nimbark Sampradaya. So I kindly request you not to delete the Hamsa God article from Wikipedia. Thanks Srabanta Deb (talk) 00:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srabanta Deb,

I agree that this isn't a duplication of the other article but this page is completely unsourced and could be tagged for deletion. The safest decision would be to move this page into Draft space where you can work on it. If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or the deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Habiganj District

added a link pointing to Graduate

Lakhai Upazila

added a link pointing to Graduate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brajananda Saraswati moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Brajananda Saraswati, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 15:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brajananda Saraswati was a Vaishnava devotee of Hinduism. He has many disciples. This article is very important. So the registration is fully restored to its previous state. Thanks. Srabanta Deb (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dhananjay Das Kathiababa

Hello, Srabanta Deb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dhananjay Das Kathiababa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sri Sri Anandamayi Kali Mandir, Fandauk

Hello, Srabanta Deb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sri Sri Anandamayi Kali Mandir".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Anti-Hindu violence in Bangladesh

Hello SD. Thanks for starting this article. Unfortunately, there are already at least three on the same subject:

There have also been some half-hearted proposals for a merge. You might want to merge to one of the existing three though, to avoid having a fourth article. Thanks, 2A01:4C8:58:C7F5:D847:7BA5:279F:46FE (talk) 07:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article or section needs sources or references that appear in credible, third-party publications. So this edit is very important. Thanks Srabanta Deb (talk) 07:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Dhananjay Das Kathiababa

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Dhananjay Das Kathiababa a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Dhananjay Das Kathiababa. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Mccapra (talk) 22:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dhananjay Das Kathiababa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhananjay Das Kathiababa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhananjay Das Kathiababa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 10:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dhananjay Das Kathiababa Editing is very important. It has Bengali and Hindi Wikipedia edits. The main devotee of the Nimbark community of Hinduism . Thank you. Srabanta Deb (talk) 02:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dhananjay Das Kathiababa. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santadas Kathiababa

A tag has been placed on Santadas Kathiababa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhananjay Das Kathiababa. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santadas Kathiababa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santadas Kathiababa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tara Kishore Chowdhury moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tara Kishore Chowdhury, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dayananda Deb moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dayananda Deb, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance

Hello, Srabanta Deb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Banshidas Babaji

Hello, Srabanta Deb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Banshidas Babaji, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Santadas Kathiababa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santadas Kathiababa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 14:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance

Hello, Srabanta Deb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santadas Kathiababa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santadas Kathiababa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brajananda Saraswati

Hello, Srabanta Deb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brajananda Saraswati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Dr. Swami Shivananda

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Dr. Swami Shivananda. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sivananda (yoga teacher). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sivananda (yoga teacher). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Das Kathiababa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santa Das Kathiababa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Owlf 📪 12:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santadas Kathiababa

A tag has been placed on Santadas Kathiababa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santa Das Kathiababa

A tag has been placed on Santa Das Kathiababa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tara Kishore Chowdhury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tara Kishore Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara Kishore Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dayananda Deb

Hello, Srabanta Deb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dayananda Deb, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swami Santadas Kathiababa

A tag has been placed on Swami Santadas Kathiababa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dayananda Deb

Hello, Srabanta Deb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dayananda Deb".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gopal Jiu Ashram (Santdham) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gopal Jiu Ashram (Santdham), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:36, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pagal Shankar Jiu Temple, Fandauk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pagal Shankar Jiu Temple, Fandauk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:36, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swami Santadas Kathiababa

A tag has been placed on Swami Santadas Kathiababa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 16:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 17:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gopal Jiu Ashram (Santdham)

Hello, Srabanta Deb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gopal Jiu Ashram (Santdham), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pagal Shankar Jiu Temple, Fandauk

Hello, Srabanta Deb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pagal Shankar Jiu Temple, Fandauk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kumbh Mela

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you added content to an article, Kumbh Mela, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It has not been removed. I have merely added a "citation needed" tag. Please could you add a citation to a reliable source that supports the statement you added. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If nobody adds a citation that supports the statement you added, then it will be deleted. Verifiability is very important in Wikipedia articles. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Santadasji Kathiababa

The article Santadasji Kathiababa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nmarshall25 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swami Santa Dasji Kathiababa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swami Santa Dasji Kathiababa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Santa Dasji Kathiababa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Swami Santa Dasji Kathiababa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. You have tried adding "citations" to other language's Wikipedia articles several times. This is not OK.

Anyone can add content to Wikipedia articles. This makes them unreliable as a source for other Wikipedia articles. For example, I could edit Bengali Wikipedia to say that Rishi Sunak's faeces are made of solid gold (they are not – he is not a god). I could then edit English Wikipedia to say that people mine gold from London's sewage works, to obtain the gold that Rishi Sunak flushes down the toilet, and cite Bengali Wikipedia as a source for this nonsense.

Your edit has been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can discuss it on the article talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swami Santa Dasji Kathiababa

A tag has been placed on Swami Santa Dasji Kathiababa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nmarshall25 (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pagal Shankar Jiu Temple, Fandauk

Hello, Srabanta Deb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pagal Shankar Jiu Temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gopinath Jiu Temple, Fandauk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gopinath Jiu Temple, Fandauk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopinath Jiu Temple, Fandauk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the 30 Aug 2021 version of this article and saw that it contains more information on the temple than the present version. You also created the Bengali version of the article bn:গোপীনাথ জিউ মন্দির, ফান্দাউক, which is why the Bengali version reads like a translation of the 30 Aug 2021 English-language version.^{Google translate} The information in the article must have come from somewhere. Do you remember where you got the information from? A book? Personal knowledge? A chat page?

Is it possible for you to provide citations to sources for the much richer information in 30 Aug 2021 version of the article?

There is another similar article at Kali Mata Mandir, Morakari, with the same problems, but no useful citations.

If you do not fix these problems, then your efforts will have been wasted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 23:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ISKCON Prabartak Sri Krishna Temple for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ISKCON Prabartak Sri Krishna Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Prabartak Sri Krishna Temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kali Mata Mandir, Morakari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kali Mata Mandir, Morakari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali Mata Mandir, Morakari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 23:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gopal Jiu Ashram (Santdham)

Hello, Srabanta Deb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gopal Jiu Ashram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Your undiscussed page move of Santa Das Kathiababa has been reverted. If you think it should be moved to another name, then use the process at WP:RM#CM. You will need to give a reason for the move. It is a good idea to provide evidence for any statements you make. Please also read MOS:PREFIX; if your proposed name goes against Wikipedia policies it will most likely be rejected. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santa Das Kathiababa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santa Das Kathiababa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Das Kathiababa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, as you did with Santa Das Kathiababa. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The place to explain why you think that the article on Santa Das Kathiababa should be kept is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Das Kathiababa. It is not my talk page. I have moved the comments you made from my talk page to the right place.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Santa Das Kathiababa, you may be blocked from editing. You were told about this before, see User talk:Srabanta Deb#Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)).-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you repeatedly trying to delete this registration even though there are enough references in these registrations. Srabanta Deb (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not participate in the deletion discussion in August 2021. The result of the discussion was "soft delete".
It was somebody else who moved the article to draft in November 2021.
It was somebody else who moved the article to draft in January 2022.
I did not participate in the deletion discussion in March 2022. The result of the discussion was "delete".
I did participate in the deletion discussion in March 2023. The result of the discussion was "speedy delete".
It was somebody else who moved the article to draft in May 2023.
It was somebody else who asked for the article to be speedy deleted in May 2023.
I am participating in the deletion discussion in September 2023.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You created a new version of this article at Santadasji Kathia Baba at 10:32, 9 September 2023‎ (UTC). I have added it to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Das Kathiababa.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Santa Das Kathiababa

Hello Srabanta Deb! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Santa Das Kathiababa, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://sanatantv-live.translate.goog/লাখাইয়ে-শ্রীশ্রী-সন্তুু/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Santa Das Kathiababa and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Santa Das Kathiababa, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Santa Das Kathiababa. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Santa Das Kathiababa with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Santa Das Kathiababa saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gopalji Radhabihari Ashram (Santdham) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gopalji Radhabihari Ashram (Santdham) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopalji Radhabihari Ashram (Santdham) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Gopalji Radhabihari Ashram (Santdham). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. You were told about this before, see User talk:Srabanta Deb#Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)).-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Gopalji Radhabihari Ashram (Santdham). -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you repeatedly trying to delete this registration even though there are enough references in these registrations. Srabanta Deb (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it should be kept, you should explain why it should be kept at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopalji Radhabihari Ashram (Santdham).

You are allowed to improve the article during the deletion discussion, which is what you have been doing.
You are not allowed to delete the Articles for deletion notice from the article. This is needed so that other users can comment at the deletion discussion.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:03, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok .Thank you. ❤️❤️❤️ Srabanta Deb (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kathiababa Ka Sthan,Vrindavan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kathiababa Ka Sthan,Vrindavan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Temple founded by Santadas Kathiababa has been nominated for deletion

Category:Temple founded by Santadas Kathiababa has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santadasji Kathia Baba

A tag has been placed on Santadasji Kathia Baba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. The four deletion discussions are listed below; all resulted in deletion:

delete, 5 September 2023, see discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Das Kathiababa.
speedy delete, 1 March 2023, see discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Santa Dasji Kathiababa.
delete, 2 March 2022, see discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (2nd nomination).
soft delete, 21 August 2021, see discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa.

When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srabanta Deb,

If you continually insist on creating this article in main space, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. What you can do is work on a version in Draft space and submit it to Articles for Creation for review and possible approvable. But recreating this article after it has been deleted multiple times will not end very well for you. If you want to continue as an editor on Wikipedia, then please move on. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathiababa Ka Sthan,Vrindavan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathiababa Ka Sthan,Vrindavan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathiababa Ka Sthan,Vrindavan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bimala Devi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bimala Devi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimala Devi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 01:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bahula Shakti Peetha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bahula Shakti Peetha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahula Shakti Peetha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ratnavali Shaktipeeth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ratnavali Shaktipeeth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratnavali Shaktipeeth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kumarikunda Shaktipeeth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kumarikunda Shaktipeeth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumarikunda Shaktipeeth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gayeshpur Padmalochan High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gayeshpur Padmalochan High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayeshpur Padmalochan High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anandamayi Kali Temple, Brahmanbaria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anandamayi Kali Temple, Brahmanbaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anandamayi Kali Temple, Brahmanbaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Hansa Bhagwan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Hansa Bhagwan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Hansa Bhagwan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 02:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 02:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet

A tag has been placed on Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Note that as the article's creator you are not entitled to remove the speedy deletion tag. You will have to use the article's talk page to explain why you think it should be kept.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vrindavan Kathiababa Ka Sthan

A tag has been placed on Vrindavan Kathiababa Ka Sthan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating deleted articles

Please stop recreating deleted articles. In the past few hours you have:

Recreated the article at Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet‎, which Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet decided to delete. There was an option for refunding asking admins to "refund" the article - but you did not take that option; instead you just made a new version of the article.
Recreated the article at Vrindavan Kathiababa Ka Sthan, which Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathiababa Ka Sthan,Vrindavan decided to delete.
Recreated the article at Sri Hansa Bhagwan, which Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Hansa Bhagwan decided to turn into a redirect.

The main reason your articles get deleted is that you do not base them on what reliable sources say. Instead you either write what you believe or use translation software on an article in another language and post it as your own work in English-language Wikipedia. You then decorate the article with citations, without caring whether they support the text they are cited for, and without caring whether they are reliable sources.

You have been doing this since 2020, but you do not seem to have learned from your experiences.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Vrindavan Kathiababa Ka Sthan‎. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Nimbarka Ashram, Sylhet‎‎. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Because you ignored all the warnings above, failed to follow the guidelines and continued to create inappropriate articles, I've blocked you from editing for one year. Deb (talk) 09:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srabanta Deb. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I unwittingly created a new article on English Wikipedia. So Liz gave me infinite obstacles. I apologize to all Wikipedia contributors. Exempt me from this obstruction. I will create accurate, informative, reliable and good articles from now on. Srabanta Deb (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exempt me from obstruction

I unwittingly created a new article on English Wikipedia. So Lizz gave me infinite obstacles. I apologize to all Wikipedia contributors. Exempt me from this obstruction. I will create accurate, informative, reliable and good articles from now on। Srabanta Deb (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to misunderstand or misconstrue what you have done and why you were blocked. I will now be removing your talk page access. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. UtherSRG (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]