User talk:Snowycake

Snowycake, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Snowycake! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm Davejohnsan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 United States Senate election in Alabama, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 23:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

may you tell me what you reverted so i can add a source

Snowycake (talk) 23:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeraora(Pokemon) (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zeraora(Pokemon) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zeraora(Pokemon), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Curbon7. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 United States Senate election in Florida, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Curbon7 (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1924 United States Senate election in New Hampshire has been accepted

1924 United States Senate election in New Hampshire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mario Jump 83! 09:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zeraora(Pokemon)

Hello, Snowycake. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zeraora(Pokemon), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at 2021 California gubernatorial recall election. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sowry i just go kinda upset im a proud member and hate when people try to suppress 3rd parties Snowycake (talk) 21:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If something's missing and has reliable sources (WP:RS), feel free to add the content. Other editors' lack of interest is not suppression, but could be an indication that there isn't reliable sourcing yet. Zinnober9 (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since I reverted your change, and given your concerns you've stated here, I would like to remind you that you remain free to make the changes that you see fit, provided they improve the article and that you hopefully give a reason for the edit. I reverted it because you also deleted what I had just added. I don't want to make it seem like I am deliberately supressing your edits and am making it clear here why I reverted what you wrote, but please keep in mind the impression you gave when you reverted contributions that others made.2600:1012:B022:EC15:C8F6:A496:E39D:B6F1 (talk) 22:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Muboshgu. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowycake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

well i am here to build an encyclopedia how ever i think i need to also make my point a bit more clearer i am sorry if i did not make my point clear enoghf and if i was to blunt going forward i promise to use kind words

Decline reason:

This doesn't come close to addressing the concerns here. Yamla (talk) 12:30, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Put specific concerns here

i am so sorry but i do not understand specific conserns/ the thing i did to get this ban Snowycake (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowycake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am so sorry but i do not understand specific conserns/ the thing i did to get this ban also i want an explanation i will write a real appeal once i know what the conserns are Snowycake (talk) 19:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem more interested in playing politics than in improving this encyclopedia. As such, you were blocked as WP:NOTHERE, and I agree. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowycake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to appeal to my ban i made a mistake. I was playing politics and that was wrong of me i should have been working to build an enclyopedia i would like to appoligize to everyone who was affected and i will not do what i did again Snowycake (talk) 19:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please explain why we'd want someone on this website who writes stuff like Special:Diff/1033331698. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:47, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you plan to write about instead? Are you suggesting a topic ban for all politics, or only a specific subset of politics? --Yamla (talk) 19:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you now understand about reliable sources that you didn't understand before? --Yamla (talk) 19:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I still want to write about politics just i will make sure my personal beliefs do not effect what i write also in general i will write less about politics and more about culinary desserts Snowycake (talk) 19:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

for the second thing i now know i need to put ^{[citation needed]} Snowycake (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2021 (UTC@)

@Yamla i awnsered your questions

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowycake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see above the person asked some Qs i gave som As and they never got back

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - only one unblock request open at a time, please. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowycake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

in the most recent decline it cited something i did so i want to explain what happend the first part i did not no was agast wikipedia rules now that i have read all of wikipedia rules i will not do that again as for spamming my name my computer was slow and i didnt know that i had already signed it Snowycake (talk) 19:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think an unblock is possible, but you will have to agree to not edit politics, at least until you become proficient at editing. PhilKnight (talk) 20:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Was the edit summary that I had to delete here (where you said a number of unkind words as you accused other editors of trying to suppress third parties) also done by accident? GeneralNotability (talk) 20:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

again i didnt understand the rules Snowycake (talk) 21:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowycake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i agree to ur terms 100% Snowycake (talk) 21:33, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the abusive link mentioned, there is no chance that you will be unblocked at present. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 15:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think that's a "no" to the exemption. PhilKnight (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC) ok im cool w/ that Snowycake (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowycake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello are you gonna respond Snowycake (talk) 22:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stop it. One open unblock request at a time. We are all volunteers here, it's abusive and doesn't help your case, posting multiple simultaneous unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 22:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to modify or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. See WP:BLANKING. I know you did that in good faith, so this is just a polite note that it's not permitted. --Yamla (talk) 22:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Snowycake (talk) 22:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wait for GeneralNotability] to give his opinion. PhilKnight (talk) 22:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed a direct link to off-wiki harassment obviously created by this user and have revoked talk page access as a result. Reviewing administrator should take this into account as direct evidence of bad faith. --Yamla (talk) 10:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Your draft article, Draft:Zeraora(Pokemon)

Hello, Snowycake. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zeraora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]