User talk:Snickerdo

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nrpscrest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nrpscrest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pauline mcgibbon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pauline mcgibbon.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wellandcrest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wellandcrest.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GO Transit rail system

Are you having fun yet? You are right on with the escarpment crossings - sorry. Please check my latest changes to the CPR connection to the former New York Central main line across southern Ontario. This is supposed to be for GO Trains but I think almost every major line in area is shown - which helps to explain why GO uses the tracks they do. Some icons are missing or just don't look right to me. Highway overpass and underpass are different colours and a correct Hamilton Junction symbol is not available. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once upon a time, I was going to create a track diagram for the Toronto, Hamilton and Buffalo Railway and had a look at realignments in the Welland Area. I gave up. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

401 Featured picture

Hi there Snickerdo, was wondering if you might support a picture of Kings Highway 401 that's been nominated for a featured picture. I think just a few more supporting votes for the alternative (colour photo) will allow it to pass. Here's the link: [1]. Anyways thanks in advance and I look forward to working with you to make that article better! Haljackey (talk) 15:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Highway-424.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Highway-424.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 23:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NiagaraRegionTransitLogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NiagaraRegionTransitLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

St. Catharines neighbourhoods map

Hello, I have some questions for you regarding the image of "The Communities of St. Catharines" (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:St.-Catharines-Neighbourhoo.png) showing the city's neighbourhoods. I have been searching for a map such as this one and have found no others like it on the Internet. Are there any others like it on the Internet? What is your illustration based on? Is there an official (or unofficial) list of neighbourhood names with their boundaries out there somewhere? I am looking for additional references in this area. Thank you! Nosaelg (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parclo-AB3.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parclo-AB3.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Future Ontario Expressways

Where did you find this photo: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/Expressway-network-future.png

I have done some research and have not been able to find any plans for a new highway north on London connecting the 402 to the 401/403 interchange. I would like to see these plans, so if you could direct me that would be great.

That map is a mess of unexplained OR methinks. I believe the highway around London is supposed to be this one...Ring Road to Nowhere but that certainly isn't under consideration these days. In the mid-1960s, perhaps a planners dream. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 08:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:400-series-network-future.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:07, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:NiagaraRR55.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NiagaraRR55.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Floydian ^τ _¢ 15:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parclo-AB3.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parclo-AB3.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Parclo-B2.png

The file File:Parclo-B2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned graph/chart/diagram.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NiagaraRR581.png

The file File:NiagaraRR581.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NiagaraRR681.png

The file File:NiagaraRR681.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NiagaraRR3A.png

The file File:NiagaraRR3A.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NiagaraRR420.png

The file File:NiagaraRR420.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:GatoradeComplex.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GatoradeComplex.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Communities in St. Catharines, Ontario

Template:Communities in St. Catharines, Ontario has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]