User talk:Sinistrial

Welcome

Hello, Sinistrial! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! APK because, he says, it's true 17:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Marina Orlova, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did, can't you read?

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Marina Orlova. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

are you dumb? everything I added had a source--Sinistrial (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not be rude and personal about me. Utube inline links like that are not reliable sources for wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Marina Orlova, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Off2riorob (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

disruptive? you tell me you can't cite youtube so i removed that part but you STILL revert AGAIN, and I'm being the disruptive one?

Personally I do not care, but you haven't got a wikipedia reliable citation and for such a claim you would need a strong one, you repeatedly stuffing it in is not going to get it included in the article, it is more likely to get you restricted from editing. Have a look at WP:RS and see if you can find one. Off2riorob (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The term "published" is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online. However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable third-party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable source.

oh man did you even read that page?

i reported you as you clearly don't know what you are talking about but insist on hitting the revert button anyway

To be very clear; until you settle this dispute over the sourcing, do not add the material to the article. Discuss on the artlce's talk page, stop edit warring immediately. Kuru (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Off2riorob's edits are not vandalism, but are aiming to enforce our policy on WP:Biographies of living persons. Read that policy, read WP:Reliable sources, and also read WP:Bold, revert, discuss: if your edits are reverted, don't just put them in again and start an edit war; discuss them on the article talk page, as Off2riorob invited you to, and try to reach consensus. If you can't agree, use WP:Dispute resolution. That's how Wikipedia works. Edit warring will only get you blocked. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reliable citations

Looking for a reliable citation Marina Orlova was a russian pole dancer (google) .. no nothing there. I will keep looking for you. Off2riorob (talk) 15:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not every russian documentary has an online script translated to english.--Sinistrial (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Marina Orlova. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no support for you to add your disputed claims, I suggest you take it to and ask where you have taken your other question, to the WP:BLPN to get some community opinions for your desired addition. Off2riorob (talk) 20:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have failed to show how the russian documentary was unreliable, you've already been given over a week to do so.--Sinistrial (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Editor review/Dusti. Trusilver 21:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticizing someones edits in an editor review is not a personal attack, so striked.--Sinistrial (talk) 23:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

You were momentarily blocked by this admin through an error on my part. I believe I have unblocked you, cleared the autoblock and recorded my error in your block log. My apologies for the inconvenience.

Your comment on my Editor Review

Can you show me what you were referring to? Dusti^SPEAK!! 22:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Marina Orlova. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 20:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have been warned about WP:BLP issues, the next time you restore questionable material to Marina Orlova you may be blocked. Get consensus first at some appropriate place, either the article talk page, or at WP:BLP/N. EdJohnston (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marina Rodina

The article Marina Rodina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article has no content

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diannaa ^TALK 02:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marina Rodina

A tag has been placed on Marina Rodina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marokwitz (talk) 08:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marina Orlova. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 15:29, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You broke it, lol.--Sinistrial (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orlova is known and notable for more than just her youtube stuff. She's got a book and has appeared on O'Reilly numerous times (although some would question the notability of that activity. Multiple edits and reverts is a nuisance, and not much more. For my part, I'm looking to make Wikipedia a worthwhile product, particularly in subjects which interest me. Orlova does a fine job, so keeping her article within WP standards is worthwhile.--S. Rich (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Rodina listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Marina Rodina. Since you had some involvement with the Marina Rodina redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Prodego ^talk 21:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]