User talk:ShyPinkLolly

Welcome!

Hello, ShyPinkLolly, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bethan Wright, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bethan Wright

The article Bethan Wright has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bethan Wright

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bethan Wright, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6279069/bio. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Your addition to Car-jacked (Novel by Ali Sparkes) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Car-jacked (Novel by Ali Sparkes)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Car-jacked (Novel by Ali Sparkes), ShyPinkLolly!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I removed the copyright violating copy-paste. Feel free to rewrite a summary in your own words. Please see WP:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Plagiarism for more information, as well as Manual of style for writing about fiction.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 18:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I didn't copy and paste it from another website, this is what it says on my edition of the book. And I said it was from the blurb as well.

The section you titled "Summary on Ali Sparkes' website" is copied directly from the book page on the website. I can't verifiy the blurb on the book, but if you typed the same text, it's still still a copyright violation. I can't claim "here is the complete text of the book" and then type out the entire book. Be also aware of WP:Close paraphrasing. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 19:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks for that. I am a new user, a few months, and this is my first proper article after my one on Bethan Wright the actress was removed. So no need to rub it in, but thanks for the feedback. °v°

November 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to So Awkward has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: So Awkward was changed by ShyPinkLolly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869241 on 2017-11-10T16:48:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:81+hhThxteL-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:81+hhThxteL-1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Arsenic-for-Tea-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arsenic-for-Tea-cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Arsenic-for-Tea-cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Arsenic-for-Tea-cover.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nthep (talk) 15:18, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About Murder Most Unladylike

Hello ShyPink, and thank you for your contributions
The most obvious problem with this article is that there is no main article about the book's author. Robin Stevens is about a someone who works in TV for children.
I'd be happy to help you write "Robin Stevens (author)".
What do you think about this? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, But you probably don't know her. And plus, I can do it myself.Thanks for offering, though. ShyPinkLolly (talk) 14:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) What has Shirt58 got or not got to do with children's TV?! SerialNumber54129 15:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any Wikipedia editor can write an article about any notable topic at any time. By far the biggest problem with Murder Most Unladylike is that the references are to the author's own website, plus a routine Google Books listing. This is completely unacceptable. Wikipedia articles must summarize what independent sources say about the topic. Unless this problem is solved, it is likely that the article will be deleted. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible references for Murder Most Unladylike

Guardian review

South China Morning Post review

Independent coverage

brief New Stateman review

It is independent coverage that establishes notability. These should be helpful. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The book has been published in the United States under the title Murder is Bad Manners, which should be mentioned in the article:

Kirkus Reviews review

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nevermoor: The Trails of Morrigan Crow (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:ShyPinkLolly/Nevermoor: The Trails of Morrigan Crow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ShyPinkLolly, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenic For Tea moved to draftspace unilaterally as failing GNG, NBOOK and acts solely as an extension of the authors website (despite my quick effort)

An article you recently created, Arsenic For Tea, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Widefox; talk 18:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I see you're a new editor and trying to add articles about children's books with have been nominated for important awards. Which is nice. Can you please take a couple of minutes to go to Talk:Car-Jacked (novel) and join a bit of teamwork there? Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wells & Wong Detective Society for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wells & Wong Detective Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wells & Wong Detective Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 21:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]