User talk:Prateek Pattanaik

Discussion tracking

Contributions by Prateek Pattanaik to: User talks · Article talks · Wikipedia talks

Odia

Hi, for adding content in Odia script, please try https://or.wikipedia.org/. There are also links to corresponding Odia article in the Languages block (on the left-hand side by default) of many Odisha-related articles on English Wikipedia. Thanks.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 11:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: : I added the Odia names only in the cases of temples that are present in Odisha and are related to its culture. Think of it as the name in Native Language. This is a general practice and I do not see what is wrong in it. - Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 11:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: : You can see examples of such usage as a general practice in articles like Mahakaleshwar Temple and Mahabodhi Temple.

Thank you. I've removed those as well. Adding the name in Odia/Indic script is largely unnecessary, unhelpful, and not general practice in English-language scholarly sources. It is also a slippery slope leading to clutter and editwars; WP:INDICSCRIPTS was brought in for a reason. Those who want to find out about an article's Odia orthography can simply read the Odia Wikipedia article. If you would like to add an Odia pronunciation, please use IPA and/or add an audio pronunciation guide as seen in Odisha. (And I see that Bhubaneswar only has a pronunciation guide for Bhubaneshwar.)—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 07:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: : Thanks for the help, Haddock. I'll add the IPAs and the audio pronunciations soon. -Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 08:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konark Sun Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Makara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pattachitra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sonepur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prahallada Nataka

Thanks for writing Prahallada Nataka. I think this can be nominated at WP:DYK. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Prateek Pattanaik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help

Hi,

I was looking for some small help.Recently I created a new article en:Kithaab i.e. hi:किताब (नाटक)-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation & being translated in various languages like Tamil ta:கித்தாப் Telugu te:కితాబ్ (మలయాళ నాటకం).

Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab hi:किताब (नाटक) bn:কিতাব (নাটক) to your language ଓଡ଼ିଆ Wikipedia. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.

Thanking you , with warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics

The article Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no in-depth independent sources about the journal. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG (see also WP:NOTINHERITED.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious!

pearls of Odisha

Thank you for your thankless quality contributions to articles on Odia culture, including beautiful images, and your efforts in developing the Odia Wikipedia. It is a true pleasure to say this to a fellow Odia – you are an awesome Wikipedian!

Sainsf (talk · contribs) 14:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are recipient no. 2324 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Many thanks for the prize! :) -Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 18:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please thank Sainsf who found you, - I only added the number. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf: Thanks, Sainsf (talk · contribs) :) -Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you copy from one article to another

you must, for copyright reasons, indicate that, and the simplest way is to add something in the edit summary saying copied from [[this article]]. If you haven't done that, you can do a "null edit" - edit a section by adding a space, then in the edit summary write "null edit" and the link etc. Doug Weller talk 17:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- @Doug Weller: : Thanks for the tip. Since I had written the paragraph in the initial article too, I wrongly considered there was no need to reiterate it. Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 02:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I understand, but as it's easy to check to see where text comes from (something a number of us do simply to make sure it's not a copyright violation, there's a lot of that), making it clear saves time. Doug Weller talk 08:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramhari Das

The article Ramhari Das has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Northern Escapee (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Escapee: Thank you for the message. I published the article accidentally without adding all sources, and promptly corrected my error soon. If you notice, one of the sources is the Sangeet Natak Akademi, the premier cultural institution of India, a governmental body. I think that qualifies as a very reliable source, and hence this tag can be safely removed. Meanwhile, I will continue to add more references, as is the norm. -Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Prateek Pattanaik, thanks for the work you do here. kindly always remember to include sources in articles you create before publication as this is one of the fundamental editorial policies. Regards. Northern Escapee (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

250 years Beethoven, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bichitrananda Swain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bichitrananda Swain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bichitrananda Swain moved to draftspace

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Bichitrananda Swain, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bichitrananda Swain

Hello, Prateek Pattanaik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bichitrananda Swain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bichitrananda Swain

Hello, Prateek Pattanaik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bichitrananda Swain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Odissi raga

Template:Infobox Odissi raga has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 14:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Satchidananda Das moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Satchidananda Das, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the biography published as part of the state level award by the Government of Odisha, one of the highest awards to be given. The source cannot be dismissed as unreliable. Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Satchidananda Das (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Satchidananda Das and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Prateek Pattanaik! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Satchidananda Das

Hello, Prateek Pattanaik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Satchidananda Das, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it as helpful to reply to talk page posts from 2011 and 2007

I doubt anyone will pay any attention. Doug Weller talk 14:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recording a point of view will help in future discussions, as I see it. Helps to avoid the same questions over and over, delaying useful edits. Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 16:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Satchidananda Das

Hello, Prateek Pattanaik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Satchidananda Das".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Your edit to Jayadeva birth controversy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Doug Weller talk 15:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 14:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Odisha Sangeet Natak Akademi award

Template:Odisha Sangeet Natak Akademi award has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]