User talk:Shanewatson20
Shanewatson20, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Shanewatson20! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
Sustainable Development Goals
[edit]Hi Shanewatson20, thanks you so much for your contributions and all the work you did on creating individual articles for each of the development goals. I noticed there has been a conversation on the talk page of that article about possibly creating individual articles per goal. There had been a separate conversation a few years back at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Development Goal 3 that concluded that the best place would be for all goals to be in one article. Clearly those views are conflicting. I think a) there needs to be wider conversation about the splits - some goals have been split out and provide additional depth; b) instead of bulk creating stubs with little to no detail it may be preferable to create more wholesome articles one goal at a time and while doing so, reduce the size of the main article. I have therefore redirected those stubs back to the main article until there have been some time to review the approach. I hope this makes sense. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 01:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Jake Brockman, Thanks for your comments. As you had mentioned there are some SDGs with separate pages and some within a single article. I agree that one at time approach is generally how content should be added instead of creating Stubs. There seems to be a larger content non-parity between French/German and English as the pages for Goals in French and English for some goals is well written with more content which might be potentially translated or more content added in english itself if more people start contributing to these goal pages. As you know SDGs and their goals along with targets, indicators are widely watched and almost all organizations are aligning themselves to these goals, so my opinion would be to have separate pages and slowly content gets added to them as the days progress as people working in the focus areas related to those goals will add unique and useful content which will provide a goal wise summary for any reader who would not only know the goals but also the targets and outcomes till date. Ideally I would request you to consider a 6 month time for those pages and see if we can get more contributors as each of those goals are not just one line statements but multiple targets and indicators aligning to them against which progress is measured. But as someone who has been in other discussions related to this I will leave it to your best judgement. Thank you for taking the time to talk to me. pseudonym Shanewatson20 talk 01:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi again.You raised a couple of good points. i) each language project had their own rules and principles about what is worthy for inclusion into Wikipedia. Some of these rules are similar, some may be very different. Bluntly put, existence in e.g. German Wikipedia is irrelevant for English Wikipedia. Articles must stand entirely on the merits of e.g. notability within this project. Having said that, when reviewing articles about people, companies, etc. in certain countries, I do take absense/presence as indicator to dig a little deeper. ii) I appreciate that UN/UNESCO programs get some attention (and in some cases can be very controversial), however when splitting articles each split needs to stand on its own feet, so to speak. So when looking at, e.g. goal 3, does the article about this goal fulfil all the criteria about notability and this should be presented with sufficient sources that are independent of the subject. See also WP:PAGEDECIDE. It is not up to me to provide timelines, etc. I can only give a view on Wikipedia policies. Looking at some of the splits, Sustainable Development Goal 14 seems minimally viable, however I'd raise the concern that the sourcing is very much primary. This article may be a good starting point. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 02:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi User:Shanewatson20, thank you for creating the individual SDG articles, I had the same task on my to-do list as well! Hi Jake Brockman, thank you for raising your concern but I think we should fairly quickly be able to alleviate your concerns. All the SDGs deserve articles in their own right, they each will have lots of content. Just give us a little bit of time to build them up. If you prefer, they could be first built up in the overall SDG article and then split off when they reach a certain size. But I think they could also be created from scratch and then built up. I am actually part of an initiative that wants to work on this during an edit-a-thon in September so it's good to lay the prep work for it now and start/continue the conversations. See link to project description (a bit out of date, will update it soon), here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_loves_Sustainable_Development_Goals EMsmile (talk) 13:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Please continue the discussion here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Sustainable_Development_Goals#Should_each_SDG_have_its_own_article%3F EMsmile (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi User:Shanewatson20, thank you for creating the individual SDG articles, I had the same task on my to-do list as well! Hi Jake Brockman, thank you for raising your concern but I think we should fairly quickly be able to alleviate your concerns. All the SDGs deserve articles in their own right, they each will have lots of content. Just give us a little bit of time to build them up. If you prefer, they could be first built up in the overall SDG article and then split off when they reach a certain size. But I think they could also be created from scratch and then built up. I am actually part of an initiative that wants to work on this during an edit-a-thon in September so it's good to lay the prep work for it now and start/continue the conversations. See link to project description (a bit out of date, will update it soon), here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_loves_Sustainable_Development_Goals EMsmile (talk) 13:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi again.You raised a couple of good points. i) each language project had their own rules and principles about what is worthy for inclusion into Wikipedia. Some of these rules are similar, some may be very different. Bluntly put, existence in e.g. German Wikipedia is irrelevant for English Wikipedia. Articles must stand entirely on the merits of e.g. notability within this project. Having said that, when reviewing articles about people, companies, etc. in certain countries, I do take absense/presence as indicator to dig a little deeper. ii) I appreciate that UN/UNESCO programs get some attention (and in some cases can be very controversial), however when splitting articles each split needs to stand on its own feet, so to speak. So when looking at, e.g. goal 3, does the article about this goal fulfil all the criteria about notability and this should be presented with sufficient sources that are independent of the subject. See also WP:PAGEDECIDE. It is not up to me to provide timelines, etc. I can only give a view on Wikipedia policies. Looking at some of the splits, Sustainable Development Goal 14 seems minimally viable, however I'd raise the concern that the sourcing is very much primary. This article may be a good starting point. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 02:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and the edit-a-thon on SDGs in September 2020
[edit].png)
Hi,
I am EMsmile, and I am a part of a group of people wishing to improve SDG-related articles on Wikipedia. We are organising this online SDG edit-a-thon during Global Goals Week, 18-26 September 2020. Please take part in it! If you have any questions about this work, please feel free to ask your question on the event's talk page here. The event page itself is here.
Here are some pages about Wikipedia editing that you might find helpful:
- Quick introduction to Wikipedia
- Finding your way around Wikipedia for novices, including tutorial videos
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
Please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) when you post on talk pages. This will automatically produce your username and the date. Look for the "tilde" character on your keyboard; for example on English keyboards it is to the left of the "enter" key (accessible with the "alt gr" key).EMsmile (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sustainable Development Goal 9 for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sustainable Development Goal 9 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Development Goal 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 14:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Systemanaturae.org
[edit]
Hello, Shanewatson20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Systemanaturae.org".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Systemanaturae.org (June 29)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Systemanaturae.org and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Systemanaturae.org, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your draft article, Draft:Systemanaturae.org
[edit]Hello, Shanewatson20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Systemanaturae.org".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)