Talk:Sustainable Development Goals

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sustainable Development Goals article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 12 months

Other talk page banners

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Ending poverty in all its forms everywhere was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 1 October 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Sustainable Development Goals. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The article SDG 14 and the Rio Conventions was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 May 2019 with a consensus to merge the content into Sustainable Development Goals. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.

International development High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Environment: Sustainability High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Globalization Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sanitation Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

International relations: United Nations Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Noinclude on Infobox

I noticed the infobox was <noincluded>. Is that needed? I didn't remove it in case there's a reason, but I think it's just clutter because most pages don't do it that way. Does anyone know if there's a reason? Dukese805 (talk) 21:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Dukese805: the reason is so that the infobox does not included in excerpts, i.e. when this article is transcribed elsewhere. It's not visible to the reader so I don't think it's a problem? EMsmile (talk) 11:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Back to economics class

There is no such thing as "sustainable economic growth". Growth of any kind is by definition unsustainable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

have a look at the article on sustainable development where this tension is discussed... (article needs improvement). EMsmile (talk) 07:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Extra points for sustainable economic growth linking back to sustainable development. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 13:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SDG Common Agreement

Hi,Why we're not yet done with all we all want and need to achieve??.Sometimes things and somethings they've delayed by us to take actions as to stop unwanted conflicts,unnecessary spendings,unwanted pregnancies,stop corruptions and fraud,stop spreading illnesses,stop inequalities,solve global social problems and more.Amooketsi SDG suitable Economy that creates work and expand to bring changes on every worker income as we all know that cost of living is everytime the highest crisis that lead to poverty, hunger and lack of unemployment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.197.197 (talk) 11:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Denialism and criticism

I was researching for sources linking the SDG criticism with denialist and far-right conspiracy theories for another article, but I find that there's no section about criticism or reception in the article, but it seems that it existed in the past, as seen in the discussion. I think that having such a section with a good summary of who is against and why, should be good for understanding better the topic. Is there any reason for not having it? Theklan (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reference:

Theklan (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We do have such a section in the article. You can find this kind of content under "challenges", User:Theklan. EMsmile (talk) 21:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced paragraph in the lead

On 1 December, you, User:JD John M. Turner, had added the below paragraph to the lead. However, I have restored the previous version of the lead now because I felt your changes to the lead were not well justified. The lead is meant to be a summary of the article. It is useful to have sources for those statements of the lead that need sources (no sources needed for pure summary statements). Your paragraph is not wrong but it's unclear where it came from. What's the source of it? It reads a bit like "UN speech", was it copied from a UN website? This is the paragraph I mean:

"The SDGs emphasize the indivisibility of sustainable development's social, economic, and environmental dimensions, advocating for inclusive policies and practices at global, national, and local levels. Despite their non-binding nature, the SDGs have influenced global debates, policy agendas, and institutional priorities, though transformative change remains limited. Collaborative financing, technological innovation, and a strengthened global partnership are critical for achieving these ambitious goals by 2030." EMsmile (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction on 13?: “environmental” v. “planetary?”

Not sure if it’s a typo? But how can #13 be environment-focused but also encourage consumption/not pursue planetary integrity? Just wondering if it was supposed to be 7,12 and (some other number?). “The SDGs include three environment-focused SDGs, which are Goal 13, 14 and 15 (climate, land and oceans), but there is no overarching environmental or planetary goal. The SDGs do not pursue planetary integrity as such.Other SDGs, which as Goal 7, 12 and 13 ignore the planetary limits and encourage consumption.” 2601:58A:8B83:F170:ADEA:CD51:174:63D7 (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting that. The sentence was wrong. I have deleted it now, together with the other edits made by the same user on that day. EMsmile (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]