User talk:EndzoneEnthusiast

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, Sartaj267, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ytoyoda (talk) 15:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jadon Sancho

Hi, I see you have edited Jadon Sancho's article and stated he is a Manchester United player, while I appreciate you editing this, please only edit this if there is a reliable source. Mattchapp7 (talk) 17:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have made the change because there is an official statement from Manchester United official website itself. Thank you though. Appreciate your concern.

July 2021

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that in this edit to Helal Uddin Ahmed, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 06:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The content has to be removed because the allegations that are made in that article are completely false and undignified.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Felipe Anderson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 19:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Helal Uddin Ahmed seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raphaël Varane. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. RossButsy (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No offense but why are you getting so mad?

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miralem Pjanic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. RossButsy (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Players

Please do not edit their team or status before 1 July. All contract run to 30 June 2022. Kante4 (talk) 14:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Galácticos

Could you please stop making these edits? There's no third galáctico era as of now. Pizzigs (talk) 13:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Erling Haaland. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Why replace a strong source also including the cost with a weaker one that doesn't, making the cost of the transfer uncited? Makes zero sense. TylerBurden (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to André Onana, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Giant Snowman 19:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sadio Mané, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of disruptive editing have I done? I think you are mistaken. Do not blame without looking thoroughly. Sartaj267 (talk) 06:29, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Takumi Minamino‎

By the way, I didn't mean to revert you earlier; sorry about that! I'll be glad when 1st July comes and we can then only report completed deals again. Best wishes. --Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 10:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Happy to contribute along with everyone! Sartaj267 (talk) 17:06, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Federico Valverde. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

~~Please stop your disruptive editing.~~

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

~~If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eden Hazard, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)~~[reply]

@FMSky: It is in fact common practice to specify the league a player's club plays in the lede of a player's article. Why are you reverting Sartaj267's changes? Robby.is.on (talk) 14:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is anyone supposed to know this? Its not like he ever provided an edit summary/explanation for edits that, at first glance, dont seem like improvements at all. Quite the opposite actually - having a league name that doesnt really tell a whole lot, instead of the country someone plays in. Literally just writing "this is the standard for footballers" or anything would've been ok --FMSky (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FMSky: How is anyone supposed to know this? I don't expect you to know that. But I would expect you to know you're right if you're handing out template warnings. Both of you should have settled the disagreement by discussion instead of slow-motion edit warring across multiple articles. Literally just writing "this is the standard for footballers" or anything would've been ok Did you see explain your reverts anywhere? Robby.is.on (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes i wrote "no improvement" in a number of articles when first reverting, i didnt write it every time though. is this normal editing behaviour? https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Eden_Hazard&action=history just brute forcing the same edit into the article over and over again without an explanation --FMSky (talk) 17:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good. is this normal editing behaviour? No, of course not. As I said, both of you should have started a discussion. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Helal Uddin Ahmed, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting page protection

To request page protection you should make a posting at WP:RFPP. If you use WP:TWINKLE, it can make the process much easier. Also, there has not been enough disruption at Helal Uddin Ahmed to warrant protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Helal Uddin Ahmed. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sartaj267. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Helal Uddin Ahmed, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Bangladesh)

You reverted my edit without giving any reason in edit summary, and I noticed in your contribution that you have been reverting edits of other users and administrators on a regular basis. DreamRimmer (talk) 09:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on the "Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Bangladesh)" page was reverted due to incorrect information, specifically the incumbent secretaries names, which I corrected after your wrong edits. Regarding my other reversions, they were made to maintain accuracy and adhere to Wikipedia guidelines. I would like to emphasize that my actions are rooted in a dedication to preserving the precision and quality of Wikipedia articles. Each reversion I've made aimed to rectify factual errors or breaches of Wikipedia's policies. I invite you to examine the relevant edits to better comprehend the reasoning behind my decisions. Thank you. You have a great day! Sartaj267 09:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you made the edit that I reverted, you didn't provide any source. You are aware that all users of Wikipedia come from various parts of the world, and when they check the changes made on the article of another country or topic, they must see the information inserted without any context and editing summary and If no significant information is discovered after extensive research, they believe it is appropriate to revert them, because even if there is less correct information in a Wikipedia article but there should be no incorrect information at all. I just want to advise you that in the future, you should not revert any edits other than harmful edits without summarising them so that no controversy arises. Thank you! -DreamRimmer (talk) 10:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should have checked the source in the first place before editing and this conversation and unwanted dispute between us would never happen. Sartaj267 18:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't cite any sources when you made numerous name changes in this edit. DreamRimmer (talk) 18:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have a great day! Sartaj267 13:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Twinkle Khanna, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Andrés Iniesta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lucas Vázquez, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is your source https://www.transfermarkt.com/lucas-vazquez/profil/spieler/221316 Sartaj267 05:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is your source https://www.transfermarkt.com/lucas-vazquez/profil/spieler/221316

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jude Bellingham. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this threat? Spanish Summer transfer window starts at 1 July. Sartaj267 05:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does it? Why don't any of the sources relating to Bellingham's transfer mention that? Mattythewhite (talk) 18:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you like man. I am not interested anymore. I was just being rational and professional in terms of following the Spanish transfer window and adhering to the Wikipedia format. Never mind. Sartaj267 18:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is confirmed.

Yes 84.67.223.146 (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Houssem Aouar

Hi there. Could you please explain what you are doing at Houssem Aouar? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding official statement and most reliable sources that's it. I am aware of Wikipedia policy. ESPN is more reliable source than your source. You can add your source along with the official statement and ESPN sources as well. Thank you. Sartaj267 08:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jude Bellingham

I wanted to know why you reverted the edit with regards to Jude Bellingham. A suitable source has been provided and follows the same pattern as other players. AtishT20 (talk) 09:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. My decision to revert the edit was based on Wikipedia's policy of maintaining a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (NPOV). The claim that Jude Bellingham is 'one of the best midfielders and youngsters in the world' is subjective and lacks sufficient verifiable achievements. As of now, Bellingham hasn't won accolades such as the UEFA Champions League, been included in the UEFA Team of the Season, been named Champions League Player of the Season, or won the World Cup. These are often used as objective benchmarks in evaluating such high acclaim. Without this recognition or substantial agreement among experts supported by reliable sources, the statement could infringe upon Wikipedia's NPOV policy. I hope this clarifies my decision. If you have any issues with my edit on Bellingham's page, please feel free to seek an Administrator's help. I will be the first one to put the abilities if other moderators consider it. Thank you. Sartaj267 10:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

André Onana

Three editors (myself included) have not reverted your removal of sourced content from this article. A quick look at your talk page shows that you have a history of disruptive editing and edit warring. Unless you stop, you will likely end up blocked. Giant Snowman 07:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern regarding the edits I've made. However, I must express my unease at the tone of your communication, which, at times, can be interpreted as threatening. Our goal here is to create and maintain accurate and balanced content collaboratively. Let's strive to keep our discussions productive, respectful, and free from personal or implied threats, as per Wikipedia's guidelines. Best regards. Sartaj267 08:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Order of precedence in Bangladesh, BERC Chairman Rank

@EndzoneEnthusiast,

I am writing to urgently address a significant inaccuracy on the Order of Precedence page regarding the Chairman of the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission (BERC). An erroneous edit was made on August 5, 2023, removing the Chairman's rank from the page. I am providing concrete evidence supported by official government documents to rectify this mistake and reinstate the Chairman's rightful rank without further delay.

Here's the unassailable evidence supporting the Chairman's rank:

Legal Basis: According to Section 10 of the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission Act, 2003 (Act No. 13 of 2003), the salary, allowances, and conditions of service for the Chairman and members of BERC are governed by rules. Until the rules are established, the government sets their salary, allowances, and conditions of service.
Prime Minister's Decision: Memorandum No. 03.072.019.03.001.2010-234 from the Prime Minister's Office, dated November 10, 2010, confirms the Honorable Prime Minister's decision to equate the Chairman's rank with that of a Judge of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. (Copy attached as "Copy 01")
Ministerial Approval: The Ministry of Power, Energy, and Mineral Resources, along with the Department of Energy and Mineral Resources, issued Memorandum No. 28.013.019.02.00.035.2010-583 on December 7, 2010, formally endorsing the Chairman's rank equivalent to an Appellate Division Judge. (Copy attached as "Copy 02")
Financial Alignment: Memorandum No. 07.00.0000.126.00.001.10-87, dated April 19, 2017, and Memorandum No. 07.161.00.00.00.002.2010-151, dated April 26, 2011, from the Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh, underscore the Chairman and members' agreement to align their salaries and allowances with the Supreme Court Judges (Remuneration and Privileges) (Amendment) Act, 2016. (Copy attached as "Copy 03")

Given the unequivocal legal framework and high-level decisions, I demand an immediate correction to the Order of Precedence page on Wikipedia. This demand is not a mere suggestion; it is a non-negotiable necessity based on the provided official documentation.

Should you require additional information or clarifications, please contact me at +8801777015777. Your prompt attention to rectifying this matter and upholding factual accuracy on Wikipedia is expected and demanded. 2400:C600:3369:1407:65BA:5D27:CC4C:8A2E (talk) 05:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your detailed evidence regarding the BERC Chairman's rank. I've reviewed and updated the Order of precedence in Bangladesh page on Wikipedia accordingly. Please check the changes and let me know if further adjustments are needed. EndzoneEnthusiast 10:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jan-Carlo Simić

The player is part of the first team, has made his debut with the first team yesterday and has a first team number (#82), as you can easily find yourself from the Serie A football league website who lists him as a first team player: [1][2] Saying he is a player for the Under-19 and ignoring he is also an established player in the first team (he has been appearing already four times as an unused substitute in Serie A games before making his debut yesterday) is merely incorrect. Thanks, Angelo (talk) 09:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok EndzoneEnthusiast 04:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jude Bellingham

I have seen that you've been editing out (File:Jude Bellingham with Real Madrid in 2023.jpg), but the picture isn't copyrighted because it was uploaded by the owner and was verified under cc by-sa 3.0 which is accurate. Bellingham is no more in Dortmund, he's in Madrid so the picture needs to be changed. Yotrages (talk) 9:56, 30 December 2023

What should I say to this? I removed the image that might violate copyright and added the image source. Mentioning you to resolve this issue thank you, what should I do? @Mattythewhite EndzoneEnthusiast 13:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yotrages: The image was a blatant copyright violation and was previously published online here. As such, it has been been deleted on Wikipedia, and has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons. The user who uploaded it doesn't hold *any* claim the image's rights. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who nominated for speedy deletion in the first place @Yotrages EndzoneEnthusiast 14:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@EndzoneEnthusiast: I get it now, the user entered wrong information. thanks. Yotrages (talk) 8:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm Annh07. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jude Bellingham seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mikel Arteta. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Seasider53 (talk) 10:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Seasider53 (talk) 15:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article

Re Jude Bellingham. I'm surprised an editor of your apparent experience didn't know, but WP:Good article is a status that has to be achieved by nomination, review, and acceptance as meeting the required standard. You can't just stick the tag on any random article. Please make a greater effort to restrict your editing to constructive improvement of articles. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 08:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

Why did you change the ref? Feels not needed to me. Kante4 (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i would say that one source is enough for the honours section. What do you say? The other one could be used for the prose maybe. Kante4 (talk) 09:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deemed it most appropriate to cite sources from the official website. I hold your opinion in high regard and have no objections to it. I value the opportunity to learn from your insights. EndzoneEnthusiast 10:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inter Milan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring in Kylian Mbappe

Hello, @EndzoneEnthusiast. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war on the article Kylian Mbappe. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RoyalSilver 01:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to edit-war. You have continued, despite the warning, and have violated the 3 Revert Rule so you are at risk of a block. GoldRomean (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Despite adhering to the policy, I am violating the rule and the other guy isn’t? Beautiful judgement EndzoneEnthusiast 01:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Acriist10 is also violating 3RR, and has been warned accordingly. GoldRomean (talk) 01:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not partake edit warring, I was simply reverting back to the standard format. It was Acriist10 who was reverting back my original edit which was plausible. I don’t think I deserved the threat to be blocked. EndzoneEnthusiast 01:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:3RR. Please discuss the issue on the article talk page instead of continuing to revert. I'm sure Acriist10 feels the exact same way about their edits. GoldRomean (talk) 01:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Martínez

I appreciate that you tried to create an article about Real Madrid youngster Joan Martínez, but an article already exists: Joan Martínez (footballer, born 2007). You can help expand on that one and provide more information. I redirected your article to the Joan Martínez disambiguation page as there exists another footballer also named Joan Martínez. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 23:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kepa Arrizabalaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]