User talk:SandRand97

Welcome!

Hello, SandRand97! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! StaticVapor message me! 06:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Seth Rollins, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! StaticVapor message me! 23:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to CM Punk. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 15:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bray Wyatt. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 03:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dean Ambrose. StaticVapor message me! 20:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bray Wyatt. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 15:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bray Wyatt. StaticVapor message me! 18:52, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 02:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on SummerSlam (2019). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 22:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Matt Hardy. StaticVapor message me! 15:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Are you getting these messages? If you do not start engaging with other users and providing sources for your edits. See WP: Referencing for beginners. You will be blocked from editing, maybe permanently. StaticVapor message me! 15:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wednesday Night Wars moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wednesday Night Wars, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Wednesday Night Wars

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Wednesday Night Wars, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. StaticVapor message me! 10:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bray Wyatt. StaticVapor message me! 21:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to CM Punk, goes against a Wikipedia guideline. You may find it helpful to look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 05:58, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Lars Sullivan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. S0091 (talk) 04:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SandRand97, you've certainly had enough warnings about this. S0091 has kindly offered a final warning above, but such warnings do not appear to be successful in preventing further violations, looking at the history of warnings above. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Christian Eriksen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Eriksen

Your reference used to support the Fabrice Muamba comparison was entirely inappropriate, given it did not mention Eriksen at all. I have replaced it. Giant Snowman 14:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have just notice you have been blocked for BLP violations previously. As such please consider this a final warning. The next time you add unreferenced or inadequately referenced content to BLPs you will be indefinitely blocked per WP:BLP and WP:CIR, OK? Giant Snowman 14:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reference was specifically not intended to mention Erikson, as that section of the paragraph was stating the comparison to Muamba, and was intended to support the Muamba incident. I’m not sure how you could interpret that as inappropriate. One moment I get scolded for not provided references and the next I get scolded for not providing an “appropriate” reference when I see nothing inappropriate about it. We’ll have to agree to disagree I suppose. Apologies if I am in the wrong, but I stand by my reference being entirely suitable for the context of the section it was given for. SandRand97 (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Cristiano Ronaldo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ronaldo

It’s not official so stop editing it this could be vandalism and action could be taken seriously if this continues. Salandarianflag (talk) 15:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited El Hijo del Vikingo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandido. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boris Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jr8825 • Talk 20:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your recent editing history at Chris Beniot shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you've got a history of warnings and blocks pertaining wrestler articles. Too simple to learn your lesson or at least learn the rules of Wikipedia? Maybe find a better hobby. ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cristiano Ronaldo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 00:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Edit summaires

Please stop. If you continue to use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries, you may be blocked from editing. Cable10291 (talk) 08:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TNT Sports articles

Hello, SandRand97,

You moved a lot of articles today to relect a rebranding of this channel. Please review the article content for the articles you moved to make sure the content of the article is in agreement with the new title. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your edit to Donald Trump has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of File:Donald Trump mug shot.jpg

I have reverted your placement of this image on Mug shot due to it failing the requirements of WP:NFCC #10c, and for failing WP:NFC#UUI #6. There is already a dedicated article about the image located at Mug shot of Donald Trump. While it is fine to place a link to that article elsewhere on the project, posting the image elsewhere on the project is generally not allowed, per WP:NFC#UUI #6. If you have questions about this, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 02:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Henry Cuellar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Your edit makes claims that are unsourced and is excessively detailed. Please stop edit warring over this content. General Ization ^Talk 03:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. I provided a source, The Washington Post. Check again.

2. Ok, next time I'll be as vague as possible with my edits. Understood. SandRand97 (talk) 03:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please quote the portion of the source that says that there were "three to four robbers" or that Cuellar lives in an apartment in the area. General Ization ^Talk 03:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Cuellar Carjacked At Gunpoint Outside His Washington DC Home | World News, Times Now (timesnownews.com)

I'll add to the article too. SandRand97 (talk) 03:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the new source: "The Massanger cited references from an internal group chat of members of Congress to report to report that a lawmaker said 'FYI Henry Cuellar was just carjacked in front of our building by 3-4 men at gun point. They took his car, phone and sushi but he is ok'. SandRand97 (talk) 03:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Times Now source added to Cuellar article.

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Cuellar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunpoint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 00:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]