User talk:SBson1357

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, SBson1357! Thank you for your contributions. I am John "Hannibal" Smith and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 06:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SBson1357, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SBson1357! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hey there,

That was very weird. I'm using an anti-vandalism tool that automates the process of catching vandalism, reverting edits, and posting the warnings. I didn't actually hit revert on your edits, so I'm not sure what happened there. I'm sorry about that! You didn't do anything wrong there. I reverted my edit, and removed the warning template. If you ever need help, feel free to ask. Have a good one. :) Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 06:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Photo (2006 film)

The article Photo (2006 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about film. Apparently unfinished with empty plot section.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Apoorva (Telugu actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Apoorva (Telugu actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 02:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SBson1357, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Satellite rights

Hi there, re: some of your recent edits where you introduce details about satellite rights sales into articles ([1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], etc.) satellite rights sales are not considered noteworthy by the Indian cinema task force at Wikipedia. We're not here to track every aspect of a film's finances. See this discussion if you're interested in the background. You should also see our Manual of Style for film articles as this represents community consensus for the sort of information found in film articles. "Rights" sales are not indicated anywhere in the MOS.

And even if the content was noteworthy, none of the information was sourced, which is also problematic. Please see Referencing for Beginners if you don't know how to add references, and please also see our guidelines on reliable sources so that you know what sorts of references are suitable for inclusion. (Note: user-generated sources like blogs, IMDb, Wikipedia, discussion forums, etc, are not suitable.) If you have questions, feel free to respond below. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your question

Hi SB, I'm responding here to your query on my talk page, so that it will be easier to find the links to the information. As noted above, MOS:FILM, our Manual of Style for film, presents an overview of the sort of content that should be included. You can also look for Indian films among our "GA" or "Good Article" collection to see what sort of content is generally presented. Note that these articles are not perfect by any means, and you might find GA-rated articles that contain information about satellite rights. This could be because the information was added before the community decided against including it and we just haven't gotten around to removing it, but it could also be attributed to GA reviewers not being familiar with all the various style rules for film articles and Indian film articles in particular.

Generally speaking, you should stay away from any sort of marketing speak, avoid hyperbole and subjective labels like describing films as "flops", "failures", "all-time blockbuster status", "super hit", etc. Summaries of critical response ("The film received generally positive reviews") should be directly attributed to a reliable source that says unambiguously that the film received positive reviews. Mundane marketing like trailer releases, first-look posters, TV appearances, are not noteworthy. There's tons more, but I can't think of them all. I probably should write up a FAQ or something for new editors... Anyway, if you need input from other members of the Indian film editing community, feel free to open discussions at the Indian cinema task force where people who are more familiar with Indian films than I am can help out. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your question here, I assume you're referring to "super hit"-style "verdicts", since "verdict" is typically seen in this context, for example here. Absolutely not. These are subjective terminologies and just the tone alone is inappropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia. When RottenTomatoes.com decides that a film's critical response is "rotten" we absolutely do not say "the film was declared rotten". If by verdict you are referring to a film's overall critical response, i.e. how critics responded to the film, then statements like "the film received generally negative" or "generally positive" or "received mixed response" would be suitable provided they are attributed to a major reputable source. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your addition to Aatadukundam Raa has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Siddhu.png

A tag has been placed on File:Siddhu.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I'm sorry for that. I didn't knew that the picture belonged to another website. I agree that the picture should be deleted. Sorry for my mistake. I will take care from next time.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Apoorva Aunty.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Apoorva Aunty.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Herb Abrams, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Aatadukundam Raa.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Aatadukundam Raa.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Aatadukundam Raa.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aatadukundam Raa.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Soniye on Samudram (1999 film)

Hi there, I wanted to let you know I reverted your edit where you linked "Soniye" to a Michael Jackson song. They do sound similar, admittedly, but I couldn't find a single citation to use. K_arunamon ^Talk 04:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--

Yup, you have the right idea. It's policy on the site. Even if it's self-evident in this case (the songs do sound remarkably similar), someone else has to have written about it first. Otherwise, it's considered original research and we can't do that. Thanks for being so understanding on this :) K_arunamon ^Talk 05:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your addition to Lovers (2014 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your note at User_talk:AnomieBOT (asking the wrong person). Upload the image to Wikipedia, not Commons; and add Template:Film poster rationale to the image page, using the syntax shown at the bottom of that page. Hope this helps. – Fayenatic London 18:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Lovers 2014 Telugu film.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lovers 2014 Telugu film.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I fixed this. – Fayenatic London 20:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Anveshitha serial.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Anveshitha serial.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Fayenatic London 19:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm MassiveYR. I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions to Taj Mahal (2010 film) appear to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MassiveYR (talk) 07:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please can you let me know in a simple way as I did not understand what is a soapbox. I will add the required sources, URL quickly once I add all the information regarding the article i have created. SBson1357 (talk) 07:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Click the word "soapbox" above – it is blue text instead of black, which means it is linked to another page. There is a full explanation at that page.

The point is that articles about films, or anything else, have to be written from a WP:neutral point of view. Express it as a journalist would write, not as a fan. – Fayenatic London 17:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Venkat Telugu hero.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Venkat Telugu hero.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided sufficient information regarding the image can you please fix it by adding a template as I don't know to add which template. SBson1357 (talk) 10:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no template for using non-free images of living people. See Category:Non-free use rationale templates for the available combined templates to use with non-free images. Wikipedia:File copyright tags/Non-free has a list of the specific template for the copyright part; the closest is near the end: {{Non-free biog-pic}}—to provide visual identification of a specific individual or group for whom there is no freely-licensed content, and who is deceased, or impossible or impractical to access – but a living person is not eligible for that one. Yes, I know it's a pain, but that's the law. This file will have to be deleted. – Fayenatic London 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Rohit Telugu actor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rohit Telugu actor.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you fix this with appropriate template? SBson1357 (talk) 10:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No – same as above. – Fayenatic London 20:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Taj Mahal 2010 Telugu film.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Taj Mahal 2010 Telugu film.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you fix it with appropriate template? SBson1357 (talk) 10:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please use the template yourself in future, as shown in the green section at the bottom of the template page. – Fayenatic London 17:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SBson1357, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Srinivasa Reddy (director) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 12:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your addition to Srinivasa Reddy (director) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 12:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I understood my error. Please can you let me know in a shorter way about which content can be added and which content can't? What if I read a particular article and add information from that? I mean as I copy-pasted with slight changes on Srinivasa Reddy (director) article is that fine? SBson1357 (talk) 12:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of sources are acceptable and what if I add an information which is not available on internet? SBson1357 (talk) 12:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understood the rules but can you let me know in a simpler way? SBson1357 (talk) 12:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. SBson1357 (talk) 12:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm waiting for your kind reply. SBson1357 (talk) 13:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Rohit (Telugu actor)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Rohit (Telugu actor), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/mp/2002/11/26/stories/2002112600340400.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Rohit (Telugu actor) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Rohit (Telugu actor), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rohit (Telugu actor). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Rohit (Telugu actor) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Rohit (Telugu actor) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Cordless Larry (talk) 16:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]