This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ryulong. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
O.k. I'm sorry. If you are part of the Pokémon Collaborative Project may you talk to them about voting no images for the Pokemon episode list. Please, I'm not doing the images for my use only (besides if I was I would have been posting them on my user page, which i'm not). So may you try to talk to them.
Besides how do you be apart of the Pokémon Collaborative Project???
I'm very very very very sorry about all of this I espcally sorry for giving you trouble (all that reverting crap.)
Trust me, I am a good contributor (like I said before).
(01:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC))
Unfortunately, there will not be any images on the episode lists, and it has become too much of a hassle to stop some anonymous editor from changing the template to his and your liking. Nothing bad will come out of the checkuser. Ryūlóng01:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
~:(
Also may you help me with the Category:Pokémon Opening themes please I don't want it to be Wikipedia:Categories for deletion!!!
Both of those IPs are from the same state... Texas. And there doesn'tneed to be a category for the opening themes, just an article for all of them. Ryūlóng01:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
The article Alyssa was about the name Alyssa and its derivatives until someone
replaced the whole content with all that about Alyssa Milano.
I think all contributions about Alyssa Milano should be made to origianl Alyssa Milano's page and a reference on Alyssa's page to Alyssa Milano's page.
If you think otherwise, please bring it to the article's talk page.
Okey. But the original article was about the meaning of the name. Wouldn't it be better if we left this article as is and create a new article? Persian Magi01:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I didn't vandalize anything, smart guy. I'm simply trying ot save this horrid site from stinging mediocrity. I removed an entire section of unreferenced and unverified original research, as I'm supposed to do. Or has Wikipedia abandoned the ideas and concepts of afctually being readable and verifiable? --FuriousFreddy04:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm talking about Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer cartoon studio and that big chunk of false-info and original research that was merged into it. It's now been significantly shortned and referenced (properly at that!), something that is becoming quite a rariety these days. And I did indeed edit Scooby-Doo, if you would actually read my changes, I didn't blank any section so much as revise, correct grammar, and edit down a fancrufty mention of everytime someone's parodied Scooby-Doo into a short list of titles. I really did not want to log in; I was supposed to have already quit this project weeks ago because it was deteriorating beyond control. I now see that I made the right decision originally, because good and decent contributions aren't welcomed. I hope to God that Larry Sanger gets Citizendium. off the ground and banishes this bloated, mutated, and increasingly useless Wikipedia into oblivion. --FuriousFreddy04:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Ever since FuriousFreddy's comments on my talk page, I've been unable to do any edits to it, because of the "Spam protection filter". As you are more wiki-knowledged than I, and you seem to be around at the moment, can you help me out and either (1) try to make an edit to my talk page and see if the same is true for you and/or (2) tell me what's wrong? I don't see any links to any spam-filter links there. Any help is appreciated. JPG-GR05:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Your vision must be better than mine, as I didn't see anything. Then again, this just provides another reason for me to show up for my eye exam on Thursday. Thanks! JPG-GR05:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
On the other hand, that link had been there for quite a while, so I wasn't even looking there. Regardless, thanks again. JPG-GR05:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I figured it was our good friend, but I'm so rarely editing when he's online too that I've been trying to engage him. I can be foolishly optimistic sometimes... —tregoweth (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
May I ask why you're recommending that this topic be deleted? I disagree that it is not relevant. It's an article about a character in a popular mystery series. --Bookworm85715836708:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Ryulong. Why are you deleting facts that I have added for article for boronia... Nothing better to do.
Glen's friend
Of course, this will be quickly erased, but you're an asshole. So am I, because I'm a real wikipedian and I revert and piss off lots of vandals. But as you're reverting and destroying my vandalism, it's extremely annoying. Suck Scheiße Arschloch!!!! And, of course, keep up the good work! --JohnScout09:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I actually do think you're an awesome contributor, btw. And I will totally support your next RFA. I supported your last one, as well. Best Wishes!!! --207.200.116.20009:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Blanking sucks arse, and I shouldn't do that. It's fun, but anyway, here was my original message. No idea what IP it'll show up under, since AOL is a vandal's wet dream. --207.200.116.20009:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
It's the same IP, and I copied it over, already. AOL proxies work so that the same IP edits the same page, or some crap like that. Ryūlóng09:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Your userpage indicates you've been vandalised 20 1/4 times. I was curious about the 1/4 time. Each time I've been vandalised has been an entire time, or perhaps even moreso (since some people are much more creative than I am)--207.200.116.20009:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, twas a newbie that accidentally left a message on my user page, I think (been a while). I just leave it up there now cause it's a little funny. Ryūlóng09:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
May we please have images on the Pokepisode Template.
also may we do separate episode pages. I personally will keep a watchfull eye of vandals.
Note, I will also go to every single Pokemon episode images and add the Fair use rationale, so they can be allowed on the episode list pages. (Bobabobabo16:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC))
Thanks, but no thanks
Thank you for deleting the comment that these pretzels are making me thirsty left, but please don't do it again. I was letting my friend (in real life, not wikilife) test out wikipedia, and talk to me on my talk page. I am able to revert any vandalism that occurs on my own user page. As the title says, Thanks, but no thanks. Color Me Invisible19:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Chill!
Keep cool with some snowflakes!
Try and stay calm with editors with differing opinions, the best way to get your point across to outside editors and other people in the discussion, is to make your case calmly without having a go at people. You'll gain more support for your actions, instead of ridicule, and you'll feel much better. Harmonious editing, HighwayDaytrippers20:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
But he decided to alter the template to his liking and then ask an outside admin to protect it on that version, just for pictures. Ryūlóng20:30, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Can I just ask why this was discussed in the User talk space, and then the decision being commanded as project policy? Because it's coming across like that. HighwayDaytrippers20:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, it was basically discussion over the disruption that the several users were doing, utilzining {{Digimon episode}} to show images, when there were way too many for fair use to be upheld. But then Yugigx60 went out on his own and made {{Pokepisode}} a duplicate of the Digimon episode template, and then asked an outside administrator to protect it due to the edit war. Now it's gotten way out of hand. Ryūlóng20:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, now, I think the best thing to do is for all involved editors, including the protecting admin, to discuss this at a neutral discussion page? Do you think that would be beneficial for discussion? HighwayDaytrippers20:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out. I've further clarified the reason why he was blocked on his talk page so hopefully this will clear up whatever misunderstandings he may have had about namespaces. -- Netsnipe ► 07:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I noticed your name in some edits on Power Rangers and wonder if you could look at some articles. They seem to be about a Power Rangers series that I can't verify ever existed. All appear to have been created by the same editor. They include huge numbers of articles like Power Rangers Beetle Tech, Power Rangers Beetle Tech Season 1, Power Rangers Beetle Tech Season 2, and more of the same you can find in Special:Contributions/ForeverBlack. What made me really suspicious is an article on a character, Garrett Stine, using a picture of an actor (Matthew Lawrence) who didn't play the character (but no actual actor is named) and the picture is labeled "Used only to show what Garrett would look like in real life".
I have no opinion on the fight, but I'd like to point out to both of you (crossposted to Rarelibra) that these moves are creating several double redirects, and it would be nice if y'all could clean up the mess when you're done moving things. --Golbez20:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Agree. I have already requested from Rarelibra that any new changes are taken first to WP:RM. I find this whole thing quite disruptive. We have gone through a long discussion on the matter before and seemed to reach some sort of agreement. Please note that I have no sort of agenda here (I'm neither Italian nor German). Regards, Asteriontalk20:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I actually tried to deal with whatever double redirects I know I did find and that he made in his moves. Ryūlóng21:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Sanhedrin
See Talk:Sanhedrin. Your 'friend' Nixer is making some trouble there. I see you have been involved in a little fight with him and that you are also Jewish, so drop in if you want. -Daniel575 | (talk)21:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Greetings. I'm the previously unregistered user who suplied the data regarding DaiVoyager, and subsequently noted the edits you made. Don't get me wrong, I seek not to complain; in fact I'm glad a vigilant Wikipedian was kind enough to revise my novice's statement. However, with this acount being a mere 24hours old, I have not yet learned how to credit my sources, and though I tried to, I could not. Thus, I'm leaving this message so that Hopefully I can pass on the data I found to a more skilled Wikipedian who can put it into proper from. the source I used was an aparently independently run database on Boukenger that is at least reasonably accurate-the page's creator/admin updates weekly as new episodes are aired, and had posted a japanese poster and toy advertisement for DaiVoyager, as well as already having all the data you've already mentioned in the Wikipedia article on the site in question, including the Zords and lists of villians, rangers, and precious' apearing in Boukenger. Thus, I think at least the data presented is accurate, apparently coming from Japan directly, or from someone with enough connections to japan to retrieve such data. Hence, I hereby submit the site for your review in hopes you'll find it usefull.
www.xrangeronline.com
I also apologize in advance if this message is ill-placed, being new to this I am prone to errors and thus have no problem if this message needs to be moved or somesuch.Shotesu22:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I do know of the site, but I utilize other sites for my sources. I do appreciate xranger's uploading of the 30 Sentais every week, though. Right now, I'm busy doing some other edits, and I'll look into all of this when I can. Ryūlóng22:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Although these may or may not be of any help, I do know that Wikipedia pages often sport images to go with their text; and that these are the same pics and more as were veiwable on Xranger, just much bigger and more legable.Shotesu22:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, I might not upload them, but I will use them as references. As you can see at Sargess there is already some information concerning the components of DaiVoyager. Ryūlóng22:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Pokemon Images tagged for deletion
Thank you for taking the enishitive on tagging the Pokemon images! Did it take a long time doing it, like their were about 200 images that I uploaded!! (Bobabobabo22:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
I really don't know who is right or who is wrong in this situation (he emphatically says that he is right and you are wrong) however, copy-paste moves are bad, even if they are to some sort of neutral thing (supposedly). Ryūlóng07:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Please explain why this article qualifies for speedy deletion and the article for Sybian not? Or a million other articles? FleshJoe04:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Please note that this article existed for the last 3 years and was deleted (by whom? I couldnt tell) on Sunday night with no explanation. The article survived 3 attempts to delete it by procedure (i.e. there was a public discussion) and the result was STRONG KEEP each time. I'd also like some help with making it more 'wikified'. Can you tell me where it's violating the accepted norm? (bleh I forget to sign every time). FleshJoe04:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Much appreciated. One thing about your moving it from Fleshlight to FleshLight -- the actual spelling is as far as I know 'Fleshlight', i.e. no middle capital. Also, will hits on wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Fleshlight reach the new page? Google lists the old spelling page.FleshJoe04:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! Last question (I'm nearly done restoring the article). I want to add pointers to some of the categories that have links to this article, e.g. Human sexuality, masturbation, etc. Can't figure out how to. I did look in the docs and didnt find the info I needed (my fault of course but... ) Thanks! FleshJoe05:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
What exactly does "Fair use" mean? Also, it isn't true where it says "Note: Rocky is the first Red Ranger who is not the leader of his respective team." because Jason was the original leader but when Tommy came in as the White Ranger, he was named the Power Rangers leader and Jason became 2nd in-command, so wouldn't Jason be the first Red Ranger who is not the leader of his respective team? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .
Okay, thanks. But what about my second question? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .
Yeah, but before they fired Austin St. John, Jason David Frank (Tommy) replaced Jason as the leader of the Power Ranger while Jason was still a Power Ranger. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Hi there, thanks for being on the look out, but it'd be good if you do not report users who have not edited since the last warning was issued. Thanks/wangi11:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
The biggest thing is this - everyone was centered on our actions and no consideration was given to the page naming (and original changing last year that Taalo pointed out). Similar situations abound in the military - where my soldiers do the wrong thing but the overall intentions are clear. In that case, yes, they are disciplined - while I correct the situation myself. I didn't see that happening. And I didn't appreciate the wording used against me. Somehow things can always be twisted - like the 'wikistalking' comment. Don't read into things - because accusing someone of something (like someone calling an editor a 'vandal' because of a topic the person ran into) is libel until proven true. Have a great day, and hope to run into you in a more civil manner soon. Rarelibra21:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
I apologize for what happened, but things like these should not occur on Wikipedia. Edit warring, and slinging insults (myself included it seems), but we had all tried to tell you the right means of performing the moves, and as I said, I will look into South Tyrol and the other places and see what needs to be done. Ryūlóng21:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Nope. The CSD G1 criteria holds for all pages, even talk. Thus if a talk page is nonsense, we can delete it without removing the involved article. I hope that helps. alphaChimp(talk)22:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that helps. I do find it odd, though - I would have thought just blanking the talk page would suffice. Anyway, the talk page is gone, the article remains, and I'll continue amusing myself by reverting vandalism that the vandalbot misses. John Broughton | Talk23:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Zeo Rangers Pic
What's wrong with having my picture on that page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .
What do you mean that's not the Zeo Rangers. Those are the Zeo Rangers! And who cares if it comes from a fansite, it's still a website! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .
Even if it's not necessary, it doesn't hurt to have a picture of the Zeo Rangers. It's like you remove everything people add to a Power Rangers page and you're getting pretty annoying. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .
I know, a picture of them would be all right, it's just that it should be one that comes either as a screenshot or something from solely American footage. Also, stop removing the {{orfud}} tags from those images, please? It's getting pretty annoying to keep having to do so. Also, sign your posts. Ryūlóng03:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
No, I'm not going to stop removing the {{orfud}} tags from the images because they are MY images and they are not on your Power Ranger pages so you have nothing to do with them. Also, I don't know how to sign my posts and I don't want to take the time to do so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .
Hi, I'm new to wikipedia and I joined the Vanadilism Removal Unit. I saw that when I was trying to revert vandalism I got confused and messed things up a little bit. Thanks for helping me clear that up. Also, thanks for leaving a message on my talk page with help to get me started. Rubikfreak04:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you for your help with User:Mykungfu. You did a ton of work just while I was posting a request for help on AN/I. I'm willing to do what I can to prevent this guy from disrupting things further, but I can't do it myself AND defend myself from the bogus allegations he likes to throw around. | Mr. Darcytalk04:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Ccson,Robotam,Bearly541,MrDarcy
thank you i'll have an edited version up..something easier to read.
Thanks for your revert of S Seagal's vandalism. I fear that this will continue with him unless action is taken. Could you plz mediate?Hkelkar04:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Well he might wait a day and start over. I think a confirmed non-partisan user is desperately needed to mediate matters there and you seem to be a great candidate for this. Please consider spending some time on this.I'd be ever so grateful.Hkelkar05:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I would, but I'm in school, and I should desperately be working on a laboratory report that is due in eight hours. If he repeats his edits (a violation of WP:3RR), do not revert him, but report him to WP:AN3. Ryūlóng05:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay, yes I'm new here, but my contribution to the page was deleted, both times. Now the first time was my mistake, and I realized that after I made it. But you say my addition to the Notes was too trivial, but yet you have a note saying how the sword in the movie resembles the sword used later on by the Shogun Megazord. I don't see why contribution was deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alitain (talk • contribs) .
Okay, well thanks for changing it to have The Great Temple, I was spacing the name. And again sorry for deleting that whole section before...total mistake.Alitain05:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Alitain
keep up the excellent work defending wikipedia! i have seen you around wikipedia and have noticed your dilligence in handling vandals. recently i noticed how you handled the "sausage" vandal with grace and tolerance that I am not sure i would have demonstrated. nice job. Wikipediarules222105:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Your efforts of reverting are duly noted. But in all due respect it was only a bold edit on my part which the rules endorse. I'm the founder of Public Access in Evansville, IN. The concept of renaming Public Access Community Media or Citizen Media isn't new, and I first heard it at the Alliance for Community Media's Central States Annual Convention in 2000 in Dayton, OH, which only three others and myself were invited for our efforts in quickly starting Public Access in our areas. The renaming of the article was most recently suggested by the Public Access coordinator named Sean Effel who like myself is a heavy contributor to the Public Access article.
The history which you say need not be rewritten is endorsed by the Father of Public Access himself - George C. Stoney. See the History of Public Access link by Bill Olsen if you don't believe me. As for you removing the flags that's almost tantamount to vandalisim. "Not necessary?" It's our heirtage and Wikipedia's rules for making good articles call for images.
Therefore, if you vandalize the public access entry again I will get an Administrator involved and or see that your blocked. The last person like you to keep vandalising the article no longer post there.
I owe you an apology. On second look today at your changes after having a good night's sleep I realized there was little I disagreed with. I did add "some" readditions and "some" images but that's all, which I described along with an apology in the edit summary. I also read up on the WP:OWN and WP:POV. Thanks for the suggestion. I'm sorry I snapped at you. Thanks again for your edits. Your Brother in Christ, DavidWJohnson18:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, and it was basically a WP:OWN and WP:NC(CN) issue. I have never heard of it as "Citizen Media" or "Community Media" and there was not much changed (I had just replaced the History section with the one prior to your handful of edits, one that omitted the Canadian and American flags). I wish you luck in your future Wikipedia ventures. Ryūlóng20:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
ok..so
ok, so, if there is an article without diacritics and someone moves it to add diacritics, that is ok? That is a double standard. if the article started out without diacritics, then it should stay there until an overall consensus is reached. if the article started out with diacritics, then it should stay there until an overall consensus is reached. you can't play favourites and say that all articles should get moved to add diacritics until a consensus is reached. Certain users had done mass moving of articles to include diacritics without consensus while discussions were taking place. my attmepts to return articles to their original state are being confronted by you. Right now discussions have stalled, but the mass moving without consensus that occured can't stay. One of the reasons they can't stay is that (and this is an actualy arguement used) "most articles have diacritics already". That arguement only held true because during discussions, people were moving to their favour instead of being civil and putting a freeze on moves. Masterhatch06:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
It all depends on whether or not the actual name has diacritics in it. If you went and moved Wikipedia to Wīkĭpėdíâ, that would be pointless, as there are no such diacritics within the name (and it might be move protected anyway). All of these Finnish, Czech, and other European-born hockey players' names have diacritic marks in them, and there are redirects (due to moves and unmoves) that do not have the diacritics in them. Teemu Selanne goes to Teemu Selänne, and Marian Stastny goes to Marián Šťastný. It doesn't matter if you don't put in the diacritics into the search, as you are sent to the correct article with that person's name as the title. Ryūlóng06:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and moves aren't necessary to make this as such. All you would have to do is make a new page and utilize #REDIRECT [[Insert text]]. Ryūlóng06:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
You have said before that "it doesn't matter". so, if it doesn't matter, what is your problem? you are right about redirects. They are great for redirecting diacritic spellings to the English spellings. my attempt, which you haven't answered, is to return them to the original article spelling until a consensus is reach. In the case that a consensus is never reached, then the articles remain at their original spelling. Some articles have diacritics in their oriignal spelling and some don't. by you moving all of them to diacritic form, you are forcing your personal pov (which some might call vandalism) on wikipedia. Masterhatch06:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
No, redirects should not be used for diacritic spellings to English spellings. It should only be the other way around. What purpose would it be for a user to type in a name with diacritics, just to be sent to the English spelling which may not be correct? Ryūlóng06:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
what purpose would it hold to title an article with diacritics when very few people will use diacritics when they type into the search? Masterhatch06:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Because when someone types in the name without diacritics, they can be redirected to the article with diacritics. Ryūlóng06:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Pokémon is a bad example and you know it. Pokémon, not Pokemon, is the most common way to spell it in English and therefore Pokémon should be the article's title. Masterhatch06:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
a quick google search for Ragnarok comes up Ragnarok as the more common spelling, but i have no idea what the most common spellings are in the media, reference books, and other encyclopeadias. following wikipedia naming conventions, if Ragnarok is the most common spelling in English, then Ragnarok should be the article title and if Ragnarök is the most common spelling in English, then Ragnarök should be the article title. what is your point? you know my beliefs. Petr Nedvěd is the least common way of spelling that persons name in English, so the article title should be Petr Nedved. it was that way until Lemmy moved it without consensus a few weeks ago. Petr Nedvěd should be moved back to Petr Nedved for two reasons: that is the mosst common way to spell his name in English and that was the original spelling of the article (as it was moved without consensus). Masterhatch07:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Google is bad for this sort of stuff, because they get rid of diacritics in the search (you can look for one thing without them and get it with them). And I believe that Ragnarök is used in the OED or Encyclopædia Brittanica. What you believe is not what could be considered as right. If the man's name is "Petr Nedvěd" then there is no reason that his article should be at "Petr Nedved" or even "Peter Nedved". Ryūlóng07:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes i know google is not reliable. that is why i mentioned other sources. Well, if most reliable english sources spell it with diacritics, then that is how wikipedia should be. if most reliable sources spell it without diacrtics, then that is how wikipeida should be. of course, it is a case by case situation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Masterhatch (talk • contribs) .
You have been asked to participate in a mediation relating to the use images in articles detailing episodes of the Pokémon anime. If you wish to input into discussion, you can do so here, all help is welcomed towards a positive resolution. Cheers, HighwayDaytrippers20:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I think it might be time to start removing the "Kimiko's apperance" section of the the episode pages, a little too fan crufty. What do you think? Jay3218303:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me, hey why did you place me in the Adminisrator intevention against vendalism. What happened with the Pokepisode? What makes you think that i'm a sockpoppett. So just becasue i like pokemon episode summaries make me a sockpoppett? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Judai105 (talk • contribs) .
I apologize, but your arrival, style of signing your posts, areas of interest, and knowledge of Wikipedia are too much in common with several users who I have been in contact with over the past few days. Ryūlóng00:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
TV.com
Good morning. You negated my change again, stating that TV.com is not a reliable source. This is the exact quote from the editing page for the Mystic Force episode area:
"If there are episodes added here that are not listed on TV.com's page, they will be deleted and you will be warned for deliberately introducing false information into this article.
This specifically states that TV.com is a reliable source for corroboration of an episode's status. Unless the admin changes that wording, my change can stand and should not be altered as that change itself should be considered vandalism.
Thank you.
It was decided a while ago that we should not rely on TV.com as a reliable source; other pages have not been changed to reflect that decision. Ryūlóng20:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Then why did that page specfically state, as I pasted above, that TV.com WAS a reliable source? Until that statement was removed anyway. Me 22:36, 4 October 2006 (CST)
What do you think about a seperate article for supergroups? They are a pretty extensive part of the game and alot could be written about them. Certainly more than whats in the main article. I could write up the base article on bases and then you could make sure it meets wikipedia standards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Carterhawk (talk • contribs) .
There was an article on Supergroups, but it just got too laden with advertisements. A short section in the main CoH article is enough information. We don't want it to get too much like a fansite's game guide. Ryūlóng06:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Alight, but im going to change what is there now, just to include the basic information about Supergroups, ill keep it down to one paragraph. Carterhawk16:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Sailor Moon Tuxedo Article
This is to conform with the formatting for the Sailor Moon Wikiproject. This is not making the page blank, but to put it into transition for some serious editing, expanding, etc. If you would like to confirm, please read the talk page before jumping to conclusions. This is NOT making the page blank but cutting irrelevant material. Please check the Wikipedia project pages. I'll be done with it soon and will be filling back the info that was lost. So, I would highly suggest reading the TALK pages before doing reverts on a series you are not participating in the project for. I know what I'm doing. And I haven't finished yet. Thank you. If you would like to object, take it up with the Sailor Moon project. Refoprmatting a page takes time, info cutting and then readding. Give me a chance to finish and make a note and confer before reverting and then warning me. *returns to edits*--Hitsuji Kinno07:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
I was going to come defend her, but looks like she's done a good job of it herself. So yeah, don't worry; this has all been discussed, and the article will be better for it when we're done. Thanks for your concern, though; if it'd been anyone else diving in and deleting stuff, I would've jumped on them too. XD --Masamage17:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Well can we please work together so that this won't happen again. I don't know what you are talking about, the link is from my sandbox. If this is considered vandalism, please assist me on my talk page. Wikipediaman12322:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC) P.S.-It won't happen again if you help explain what I can and connot do. I just nead to know if I can use this form, or if that is against the rules as well. Please respond on MY talkpage. Talk to you soon and thanks much.
User talk:Nath85
Thanks for the archiving here. I've had a few very testing hours worth of dealing with this editor ingoring every warning link provided to them. Whilst I try to remember not to WP:BITE newcomers, this editor began a course of disruption earlier on and I had them under watch. Good to see somebody else out there (yes, yourself!) has some patience ;) Would you be willing to accept a barnstar for your efforts both here, and your excellent efforts in vandal reporting of late? -- Longhair\talk08:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I thought your reply was your way of being modest, but after checking your userpage, I see exactly what you mean now ;) You deserve just rewards for your efforts here. Give me a moment... -- Longhair\talk09:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok - forget barnstars - I don't like them much myself but tolerate them. Give me one good reason why I shouldn't nominate you for adminship? -- Longhair\talk09:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I assume you mean, a re-nomination? I wasn't aware of your first RfA sorry - I must have been looking elsewhere at the time. Can you provide me with a few of your lowest moments at Wikipedia for review. You've been accused of incivility in the past, but I'm hoping you're past that stage. -- Longhair\talk09:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Erm...this is a complicated situation right now. Let's save it for a bit later. I have midterms next week :P Ryūlóng09:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I had seen your reversions through my vandalism watch tools, as well as his commentary on your talk page. I felt that you were correct in reverting him where you had, and I had continued that at the other pages. If he needs to contact me, I have User talk:Ryulong/Unprotected. Ryūlóng09:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I sort of think you should not have reverted him here. Sure the things said might be offensive, but wikipedia is not censored on that basis. It would appear that he was *trying* to make a contribution to the discussion. --Blue Tie12:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding my other edit(s)
I am sure you are aware of the situation I'm in; you probably have read the discussion I had with David. Thanks for providing this link for me.
I want to know why you had also reverted some of my other edit(s) which are unrelated to the series of edits I made which you deemed "vandalism". One particular edit, I reverted an edit made by a user who failed to give me any explanation of why s/he removed a large piece of an article. You had reverted my revert, and I would like to know why. The other reverts you made against my I can understand. 24.23.51.2709:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For the same reasons that David had originally reverted you. All of the talk pages were for articles were in more or less the same area of study, and all (but the article) contained your same message. Unless you have already undid my false reversion on the article, I will revert myself (after I read more into the history of the article). Ryūlóng09:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I have just found out that you have no only reverted the series of edits I made which you called vandalism (this I have no problem with); I found that you also reverted OTHER edits I did, even if they were a few days ago, including the Deulist Convocation International article I had edited. I Would like that all these False-Reverts be corrected so that I won't have to go back and re-edit everything I've done over the past week.
I understand you are know for your fight against vandalism, but if this is how you carry out your "fight"; but reverting everything over the past week; then I personally would not recommend you for Administrative rights. I don't understand how this could have happened, and I shudder to think of how many false-reverts you have made to others as a result of this technique. Why do you assume the edits I have made over the past week are all inter-related? 24.23.51.2709:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Trigger finger, my bad. I had realized that I reverted one that was a bit too far back, so I have just fixed it right now. And also, the WHOIS link that you speak of on David's talk is a link provided by {{IPuser}}. I hope you accept my apology for mistakenly reverting you elsewhere. Ryūlóng09:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Ryulong, I want to respectfully say (because you may eventually become an Admin. :) that your "trigger-finger" approach or "shotgun" approach isn't working for you. The reason I think you were denied being an Admin. the first time is because you look at fighting Vandalism as a way to rack up as many "points" as you can. The way to approach it is not to treat this as a game, but to consider each anti-vandal action you take. You MAY be merely creating more mess by removing it (I'm exagerating of course). Takes a lot to be an admin., what can I tell ya'? But thanks for reverting some of my real-vandalism. 24.23.51.2709:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the constructive criticism, but this was truly a "woops, shouldn't have clicked there" thing that I did not fix immeadiately (save for at the alpha roll page, which has been fixed, anyway, which I had reverted based on the time frame). Ryūlóng09:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Ryulong, no problem. I just hope this won't happen again. I was wondering if you plan on reverting me if I was to re-add my questions to just 1 article (namely, the Race and IQ article) so that I could get some answers. David seemed to advocated this. I am still wondering what the WHOIS link is for, and why my personal information is put out there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.23.51.27 (talk) .
Please don't move my user page from my old account name to the new one. I specifically asked that I be allowed to do this. David | Talk08:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
I realize that you are moving the pages, but you are doing it in the wrong way. I have fixed it for you so the histories are preserved (all of your edits have been moved to your new username anyway, and you should probably do all of your edits on that one). Ryūlóng08:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
User:Pat Comben is a newbie who is learning how to write articles. I have fixed this one up for him to use as a template so please don't nominate it for deletion. Adam10:00, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Vandals
Ryulong - thanks for your efforts in detecting vandals, much appreciated. Could you take a look at WP:VANDAL though, as there's some good guidelines in there about what constitutes vandalism, and the correct way to report it? Cheers, --Oscarthecat10:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion log
Hi there... you comments about the image deletion log blanking you left on my talk page is not correct. Here is the quote from the top of the page:
Note: Some of these pages may be fully or partially blanked. For a complete archive of what was nominated for deletion, you may need to check the page history. Strikeouts are completely blanked. Pages should be kept as blanked for archival reasons.
Also, please have a look at the history of Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 March 3 which shows another user doing exactly what I am doing. I am only removing the items where the discussion resulted in the deletion of the article. Any entries that are still pending (but why it is pending from March I do not know) are being left. It does not seem like the IfDs are handled the same way as AfDs. Thanks.--Gay Cdn(talk)(email)(Contr.)21:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
It's definitely still on as far as I can tell, but I don't know what's new. Someone at RB is providing RAW encodes of the web videos, but he's only done it up to ep. 5. Arrow00:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I have it watchlisted, it's just that there's been no editting for a while. I figured that there hasn't been much of anything on that front in a while. I guess it's hard to find someone who can understand Thai enough for us to get more information for the page. Ryūlóng00:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Very true. There's only one person I know on RB who understands Thai, and I haven't seen him in some time. Perhaps I should PM him. On the "is the show still going" note, I checked the official site just to be sure. I can't figure out what the last episode to air was, but the forum is still running full blast, there's recent candid pictures of the cast (less than a week and a half old), and Gymnastic Pink's actress added a blog post three days ago, so it's definitely still airing. Arrow01:16, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, first of all let me say thanks for your recent maintainance work on Bleach-related articles. However, please note that frequent Bleach-related article editors have agreed on naming conventions for Bleach-related articles, many of them are in archives of Talk:Bleach (manga). I'm mainly talking about writing hollow/arrancar in lowercase. If you want to suggest a change in convention, please bring it up in the talk page. Thanks, Ynhockey(Talk)19:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I apologize. I did not know that hollow and arrancar were put in lowercase; I thought that they were proper nouns and should have been capitalized. Thank you for pointing me to my error, and I will not repeat those little mistakes when I go about editting Bleach articles. Ryūlóng20:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Megashilva
Sorry about the confusion, earlier, i am a bit new at this, and wanted to resolve this problem quickly.
Further, i would like to make a comment on another edit i made and bring it to your attention, in dinothunder it was that dinothunder was the first time that since in space that the series had the rangers in high school, well that is not correct if you look at my edit, i would like to say that my edit on that page was more correct since the rangers were living on the ship which spent most of their time there so it is logical that the rangers were not in school but turbo was the last time that the rangers were in school. please dont put a warning on that i am sorry about the confusion and will in the future write my suggestions to you and let you do the editing instead.
It is just that there is too much trivial information on the articles. While you are right, it's just that we don't need that info there. Ryūlóng01:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Civil?
In an attempt to keep the Ceres discussion on topic I thought I'd come here. There was nothing un-civil about describing a scare-mongering tactic as scare-mongering. You labelling me as un-civil was actually probably less civil. aLii07:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Because the article is vandalized, often multiple times today, usually by IPs, the article warrants semi-protection. Michael22:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Could you look at the edits made by User:Alec - U.K. I've reverted a few - but I think there are lot of factual errors being introduced, but I'm not sure enough to revert them. E.g. Tulse Hill railway station - the first line of the table at the bottom looks wrong. A lot of the edits seem to add non-useful content e.g. Olympic size swimming pool or POV or unsourced info. Some edits look totally ok, some are very off almost as though two different people are making edits. --ArmadilloFromHell04:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I have started the first 52 episodes of THe Pokemon Sunday. I hope you think its professional. Also how do be apart of the Pokémon Collaborative Project, because I want to be apart of that. Bobabobabo (00:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC))
Also please, I don't want to be blocked I am a good contributor! I'm very sorry. Please! Lets make a new leaf. Hi, I am user: Bobabobabo, I loke Pokemon, Yu-Gi-OH (Japanese verison, cuz of 4kids), Inuyasha, and Nintendo. How are you? Please forgive me Bobabobabo (00:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC))
P.S. About the reuploading the images, was a stupid thing I wasn't thinking... I had a rough start at school.
I'm sorry, but you started off completely on the wrong foot with me along with a few other users. Just watch what you do in the future. Ryūlóng00:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Do you forgive for everything.. I do think I'm good contributor, everyone has flaws... Do they?
Yes, people have flaws, but right now I, too, am in deep in school, and my priorities are weighed in favor of school and not simple bouts on Wikipedia. Ryūlóng00:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
In case you don't know the Super Sentai series pages have been recently updated and pictures have been added to those from the Power Rangers pages. I thought I should let you know that and come to a concensus if those additions won't violate fair use policy. The IP user responsible is the same user I mentioned to you before; 70.33.248.120. -Adv19302:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
On the Incident report for User:Lightning-Feather, I hope that the listing will stay as small as possible, since passers-by are apt to ignore long discussions. So, could you please add the diff you linked to into my comment above, and then delete your comment? CRCulver22:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I hope so. It's just that I've had plenty of Incident reports go un-acted upon, and the text at the top does advise that things stay as small as possible so that people don't just pass on by, so I wasn't sure. CRCulver22:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't know what that has to do with anything but obviously it happened simultaneously. I was trying to give him a chance to stop because I know he is a child, but I also happen to agree with the block and was on the verge of doing it myself. There is no reason to delete non-disruptive, non-vandal comments from other people's talk pages, but especially not administrative comments. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I've removed your intervention request for this user, as he's only had a single warning. If offending repeats, then suggest you add it to the vandal page again. Thanks for your eagle-eyed input nevertheless, --Oscarthecat10:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi - please take a look at WP:VANDAL - when reporting vandals, please try to engage them on their talk page first, rather than taking the block approach. Thanks for your continued vigilance Ryulong. --Oscarthecat20:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
He already had three blocks for the actions he repeated today. That is why I listed him there. He wants to help, but sadly he's doing more harm and he doesn't know it. Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that's who I'm talking about. Don't you see the giant stopsign on his page that failed to garner his attention? :P Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Hmmm, I see the sign, couldn't see any mention of "October" on the page, no --~~~~ timestamps for October on the page. --Oscarthecat20:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, having three blocks would be a problem, however it appears he had stopped by the time I signed on, anyway. However, I believe I am working against a copycat now (maybe the subscription to the other IP ended for that computer (once I check the whois). Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong. Thanks for your hard work patrolling for vandals. You'll make the admin's decision whether or not to block easier if you warn them more fully. Take them through {{test1}}, {{test2}}, {{test3}}, and {{test4}} before reporting them. If they're especially vandalistic, start them with a {{bv}} and treat that as the equivalent of a test3. As an admin, the first thing I do is go look for the "final warning" on their talk page; then I check to see if they've vandalized after that. If they haven't, or haven't been sufficiently warned, it makes the decision more complicated. Anyway, all the best. Bucketsofg02:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
The Relationship rules article is a new version and, as discussed in detail, now meets all three "content-guiding" criteria of Wikipedia (V, NOR, and NPOV). The topic of relationship rules is mentioned in 4 other Wikipedia articles, and the Relationship rules article contains a substantial amount of information than provided on any of the 4 other pages combined. The article meets the criteria of a good Wikipedia article. Please reconsider you decision to nominate it for speedy deletion. Kelly03:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! I appreciate it. If you would like to see improvements to the article, please feel free to suggest them and I will see what I can do. Kelly04:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
I reviewed the 3RR report and the other edits the IP was making at the time. I believe you were acting in good faith when you were reverting, so I'm not going to block you. Edit summaries like, "I don't think she was second in command..." made it look (to me) like you weren't really sure if it was vandalism. Please be more careful of 3RR when it's not clear vandalism. Thanks, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, and mind you, I did request that the IP editor discuss these changes with one of the t4's I gave him. Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
No worries. I know it can happen very, very easily when you're in vandal fighting mode. And it seemed pretty clear that you were motivated by the desire to protect the 'pedia from vandalism rather than an actual content dispute. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Too late, it seems. And it's suspicious because there are several new users with similar usernames (all starting with 0101) editting. Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I asked both my english teacher and my sisters english professor, they said the proper way to spell the plural of staff when talking about a stick or weapon would be staves, when talking about employees and such, is when you would use the form staffs. Thought I'd post this here before I edit it xD
Also, you should see about a ban on Vinimax, that's like the 6th or 7th time he's vandalized the page in less then a month :/Myzou03:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, my dictionary provides both "staves" and "staffs" for the stick, and everytime Vinimax goes at the page, it's always too long in between to get him indefblocked. I will try the next time. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Might just have to stop reading Mystic Force page xD, I'm a grammar snob, I tend to believe 2 teachers, one being a professor over a dictionary o.o;; but eh, whatever =P Myzou05:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
You edit conflicted me... twice... while I was trying to sign my comment at WP:ANI. Oops! I should have remembered to sign the first time! *blushes* --Ginkgo100talk · e@03:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Hrm, I have no idea about the spelling :P But I'm getting very sick of these endless streams of trolls who demand their "freedom of speech" quote US and Australian law to me, and now these... "customers"...--Konst.ableTalk10:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I am choosing not to block Duhman0008 for removing content from his talk page, nor will I protect the page. Please see his page for an explanation (or visit this diff, in case he reverts my explanation). --Ginkgo100talk · e@21:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Intellectual dishonesty by SELECTIVE word manipulation.
Hi,
Could you please help with the posted views of Mdwh, Wiploc and 68.103.210.128?
Is there a way to lock the nontheism site? They are not discussing the issues first. They're simply stating that "non" + "theism" = atheism (rather than nontheism). I explained in the history notes that according to the dictionary "non" can mean "of little or no consequence" like nonissue, which doesn’t mean a lack of an issue ("non" + "issue" not equal to zero/no issue, just unimportant or irrelevant issue like nontheism).
But they don’t discuss first. They just “group post” the same point of view over and over again by joining two words from the dictionary to come up with their own personal meaning. In fact, that SELECTIVE MEANING from the MULTIPLE MEANINGS of “non” in the dictionary is their only citation or source, combining two words from the dictionary for their own personal point of view.
I do not have any more time to spend on this for the next few months, and I believe that Answer.com, which uses definitions from Wikipedia, will update its definition soon (I inquired and they said a manual update would happen soon). This means that a misleading definition reflecting only three points of view from Wikipedia may stay on Answer.com for a long time!
OH ok. did i do that last one right. I was like tackling several vandals at once and i think i got them mixed up and may have put the wrong tag on one page.--aceslead21:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok now I gotta explain it to you as well. I originally created "Who is Black" and someone else changed it to "definitions of black people" without an explanation. Still there is no explanation to this day. For some reason you and others seem to adhere to using "Definitions of Black People" and ignore the obvious unfairness of doing so. I've covered all the bases, I've explained my position, I've sought arbitration, and I've not received a proper response from anyone. At this point it is wrong and totally out of Wikipedian rules to continue to change the original title. --Zaphnathpaaneah06:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Just leave it be. "Definitions of black people" is a much better title. Go discuss it at the talk page if you wish to change it, again. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Did you look at the edits he had made? Most of them looked to be solid to me. Tagging something with {{db-noimage}} when the description page is empty and the file is from commons isn't disruption, neither is tagging an image to match its description etc. Where was the actual problem? - Bobet07:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
I was going off what had been said, and I looked through a handful that were taggings of {{db-noimage}} when there was an image; whether or not that image is on the commons I did not check, but several were on en-wiki. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
The ones I looked weren't. Only thing there was, was the description page from commons and a link to the image there. The actual content on en-wiki that made it appear that there was a page was the description page here, which was blank (or only had a category). - Bobet07:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Not your fault...
I tried to diffuse this guy. He did a C&P and got caught. Now he's playing a race card, for crying out loud. I am SO angry that I am shaking. He's been warned. Next bad edit or next insult means he's gone. Period, turn the page, game over. I won't go through with this individual what I went through earlier this year with another user. - Lucky 6.907:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
LOL! I shouldn't be laughing, but I really am. At 12:18 AM, no less. OK, he's taking a time-out under WP:CIVIL until I can straighten this mess out. I'm also filing a dispute. - Lucky 6.907:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm shocked it took this long for someone to block him. He totally destroyed the black people article, transforming it into an uncited POV personal essay and edit wars causing it to be protected. He even managed to destroy the black people talk page which is dominated by his ranting, raving, and race baiting. I got so tired of trying to deal with him that I put all my energy into the Definitions of black people article. If someone can redirect the protected and POV black people article to the well cited and neutral Definitions of black people article, that would be great. Timelist09:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
He's been blocked for a month and I've protected his user and talk pages. It started as a 24-hour block but he just kept on and on and on. I actually feel sorry for this individual. I didn't block the article, at least I don't think I did. If it's protected, I'll unlock it and let an editor with some level of reason have at it. - Lucky 6.915:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
After chatting with Timelist, it's clear to me that this guy was a loose cannon. The "Who is Black" was nothing more than a C&P of the original article, something that a user with a "ton of edits" should hav known not to do. I thought you'd speedied it because it was a plagiarized original work with a bizarre title. He's gone for good. I'll deal with any repercussions later. :) - Lucky 6.916:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair Use Image in signature
I know, I know! I just noticed this infraction, and I've been manually going around removing it from my past signatures. A friend of mine is booting up his bot to help remove the image. I've been making a lot of mistakes since I've gotten back to Wiki... thanks for the help, at any rate. - Kribbeh22:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I had a color fade in mind. But that's a project for when I have time to do stuff. I've wasted enough time cleaning this mess, and I need to get back to VP2. Thanks again. - ‹('.'‹)Kribbeh(›'.')›22:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
When I use "sky blue" with the noted space, it appears a darker shade of cyan, one that almost exactly matches that of the blue Alien Ranger. RabidPanda V19:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, "sky blue" with the space gives me just white in FireFox, the "skyblue" gives me the color you are probably seeing; this is why I have switched it to the hex values/cyan, again. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
"Forever Red" vandalism
Could you please look into the vandalism on the "Forever Red" page. There is an elaborate hoax by one user to fabricate a "Forever Red" movie... he alluded to it in the lead to the FR article and created an article about it to seemingly validate his hoax. It is pretty obvious that it is a fake by looking at the page. Thanks! RabidPanda V19:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I've offered to help Narfers02 with moving the KND episode pages from "Op." to "Operation" like Lucky 6.9 suggested on his/her talk page. I noticed you said for him/her to slow down. Should I discontinue? -WarthogDemon07:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I'll go ahead and fix up whatever he misses, but I won't move pages right off the bat then. Don't want to make things go even faster. o_O -WarthogDemon07:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
sorry
when i get started in something, i dont like to stop till i have completed a section of it. i just started to edit things tonight, so im very very very new to this. i want to fix those, but i first want to move the rest of the ep. recaps to the episode list page. and i saw somewhere on there that someone said Ep. vs Episode: so i changed them all to ep. but i didnt realize that was wrong, so ill work on changing those back. and also, you really dont have to look over anything, i just copied and pasted from the one page to the other, i didnt edit anything else into or out of them.---Narhyn
P.S.im a girl, not a guy. its hard to tell from my name, but its pronounced Nair-ren - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Narfers02 (talk • contribs) .
Vinimax
This is well past at least the 6th time he's vandalized the PRMF (JUST that page) alone, he's had 3 final warnings o.O (all by diff. people :/), just was wondering why he got so many final warnings xD Myzou23:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello! I've noticed edit summaries such as this: "JS: Requesting speedy deletion." I was curious to know which tool you're using, and whether it's freely available or just something you came up with yourself. I've used vandalproof, et.al., but I'm always looking to try new stuff. Thanks! --NMChico2404:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
No. V for Vendetta was a popular comic book before it was a popular movie, there are only two V for Vendettas, and the main article should be about the one that is more knowledgeable. Please see WP:DAB. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I understand it was first, but the majority of people who have seen the film and don't even know about the comic book is larger than those who do know about the comic book at all, let alone read it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cnota (talk • contribs) .
Hi, I've just noticed that you recently left a templated userpage message. I'm just bringing to your attention that the format and context of these templates will be shortly changing. It is recommended that you visit WikiProject user warnings and harmonisation discussion pages to find out how these changes could affect the templates you use. We also would appreciate any insights or thoughts you may have on the subject. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards Daniel.Bryant09:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Beware of sneaky middle name vandal
I'm not sure if your bot can detect this type of activity, but you want be out the lookout for this user
User talk:85.210.236.29[3]
Mostly English football players and American professional wrestlers.
In one odd case the article Arnold Schwarzenegger, the vandal added the fictitious middle name Avlot, another corrected it with a sourced real middle name of Alois.
You may (or may not) be interested to learn that I have now tagged the above article (which doesn't link for some reason) for speedy deletion, and have used the removal of your tags by the supposed author as one of the criteria. If you are not happy with this - the criteria, I would be surprised if you suddenly believed the article to be legit - please feel free to remove it from the template.LessHeard vanU22:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I see you have contributed your thoughts to Wikipedia talk:Fair use/Fair use images in lists. It's been dead for a while, but I have archived it and taken a new fresh start. I hope this time we will be able to achieve something as I have summarized the main points of both sides (feel free to improve them) and I call you to express your support or oppose on the concrete proposal that I have formulated. Thanks, Renata02:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Miami, USA
Only the one. I know it, you know it... but does every English language reader of Wiki? If I were to refer to the cities of Blackburn or Montrose I would include the nation, as I am aware that many people outside of England and Scotland do not know the general location - and since I think there should be conformity within all articles I therefore add an United States link where appropriate. Obviously your userpage - as much as it really belongs to Wiki, but you are responsible for the contents - is your own affair so I apologise for my little joke. Take care. LessHeard vanU20:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC) ps. Geology - easy subject; it is either rock or non-rock, any more detail is hair splitting!
Werdnabot should not be used for article talk pages. Discussions on articles should not be archived based on date. This is only appropriate for noticeboards and if a user so chooses user talk pages. —Centrx→talk • 03:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Whereas on user talk pages the user sees all messages that come to him and handles them in the amount of time he so chooses, an article might have open issues for months. Unlike administrative noticeboards, an article talk page might be heavily active and then completely inactive with no one dealing with comments about the article. —Centrx→talk • 03:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Repeatedly reverting doesn't do much. It is not a big deal if some erroneous thing is on the page for a little while. The lasting solution is to get someone to protect the page or block the accounts. —Centrx→talk • 05:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Ryulong, I recently participated in your RfA with a Neutral leaning Support. I was hoping you could address the issues that were brought up about the use of {{bv}}, as well as WP:BITE that is mentioned in the 4th archive of your talk page. I'm very much on the fence and this could clarify things for me. Thanks, AuburnPilottalk 06:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
The {{bv}} was more than likely an overreaction by myself to someone doing a British English-American English switch in an article (I cannot really remember when it had happened) and the WP:BITE that they are referring to was more than likely my own transitions on addressing the faults brought forward at my first RFA. I do not know if Dlohcierekim refers to something early in the month of September (which makes it more like two months ago) or late in the month (which is much closer to a single month ago at this time). I have been working on everything brought up, and with this second RFA, I will definitely continue to try to improve on what the opposes bring up (which is increasing as we speak).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
May you please help, this recently blocked user name User talk:Pokeant has been blocked yet he stills edits and writes personnal attacks on his talk page me and other users have been reverting back to the page. May you please help me out! Gracies!
I was actually tempted to try and speedy it, but technically it does assert notability - references to mainstream media, etc. Whether those assertions are valid is debatable. Crystallina04:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong - I suspect that Zarbat is correct to move those pages to the new names he's giving them. It looks like the reason is that the pages are supposed to deal with both groups of indigenous Australians (Australian Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders). As such, the term "indigenous Australian" is - as (s)he explains in the edit summaries - the more inclusive term. Grutness...wha?11:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
See the bottom of your Userpage. Thank you for all your hard work in fighting the vandals of Wikipedia.
Bastiq▼e demandez 04:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)