User talk:Rudy Saint

Hello, Rudy Saint, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Changing infoboxes

Thank you for your edits! Wikipedia has a Manual of Style to help make sure that articles have a consistent appearance. When you're making changes to the infobox, please make sure your changes match the expectations - the template documentation ({{Infobox person}} and {{Infobox film}}) have good explanations of how to use the different parameters. Some of the edits you've made that really shouldn't have been done include adding zero's to single-digit dates (so use 3 instead of adding 03), wikilinking country and language, adding nationality when there's the country of birth matches, adding present day names for cities when they've changed names (Wikipedia uses the location names at the time they were born for birth location). Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Shershaah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Again, please follow the MOS and don't overlink country/language in infoboxes. Also please read WP:OVERLINK and avoid linking terms repeatedly. [1] Ravensfire (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonu Ke Titu Ki Sweety, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Staff. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anuradha (actress), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 19:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alluri Sitarama Raju, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chintapalle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hindustan Socialist Republican Association

added a link pointing to MLA

Mahavir Singh (revolutionary)

added a link pointing to Arms Act

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delhi Public School, R. K. Puram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBSE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Purani Dili Talkies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Purani Dili Talkies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dark-World25 (talk) 14:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sooryavanshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mastermind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drishyam 2 (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kumid Mishra

Hi, ive had to revert your edit to this article because you added an unsourced date of birth and place of birth which has to be referenced to a reliable source as per WP:BLP, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mission Mangal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Club and LPG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Baaghi 3

added a link pointing to Cop

Prateek Bhushan Singh

added a link pointing to Gonda

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upinder Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags and small text in infoboxes

Hi. Please do not add flags and small text to infoboxes. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding these flags, they will only be removed and you will be wasting your time. Wikipedia's style manual says flags should not be used in this way. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Aamir Khan. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sooryavansham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Meerut division, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:BoAt

Please do not waste the time of our volunteers. The draft cited no sources and hence, there's no proof of any notability. Kleuske (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dunki (film)

While reverting the changes of blocked user to previous version, your changes were accidentally removed. Please do readd your changes again. RangersRus (talk) 13:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Varun Dhawan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Anil Dhawan, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kiren Rijiju, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Law and Justice.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajendra Arlekar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akash Ambani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garvit Chaharia

The article Garvit Chaharia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garvit Chaharia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Garvit Chaharia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dcotos (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lalu Prasad Yadav

added a link pointing to Gopalganj district

Rabri Devi

added a link pointing to Gopalganj district

Smart Bazaar

added a link pointing to Reliance

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Alia Bhatt, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thedarkknightli (talk) 19:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narendra Singh Tomar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Basavaraj Bommai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yediyurappa ministry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vinai Kumar Saxena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banda district.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dhruv Rathee, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gopinath Munde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --Hipal (talk) 23:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BoAt

Hello, Rudy Saint. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BoAt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hipal (talk) 23:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the complaint on WP:ANI. I'd like to hear from you about whether you can address this problem or if a block from editing is necessary. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:BLPPRIVACY.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Schazjmd (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudy Saint (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn’t know about mentioning sources and will take care from next time. Rudy Saint (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We'll need more than your pledge to take care. Your lack of sources is only one very small aspect of the block. Please address your posting of personal information so serious it had to be removed from view so that even admins cannot see it. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock for edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudy Saint (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will definitely add the sources and limit too much personal information without citations. Thank you for your warning

Decline reason:

As per above and below. If this is the best you can do, wiki.riteme.site isn't the place for you. If you have a substantially more convincing unblock request that demonstrates you understand what you did wrong and specifically demonstrates you now understand WP:BLP, feel free to make your request. But you've already wasted two unblock requests and don't get an infinite number. Make the next one count. Yamla (talk) 20:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This really is not enough. You're going to have to convince us that you understand our policies about biographies of living people. -- asilvering (talk) 20:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudy Saint (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’ve read the policies and I think my block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. Rudy Saint (talk) 08:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is obviously inadequate, and your (better) comments below still don't convince me you have read and understood WP:BLP. PhilKnight (talk) 18:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is actually worse than your prior requests, as you are just repeating talking points back to us, and you don't do as Yamla asks above. You seem to be either unable or unwilling to answer our questions. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve read and understood all the policies on biography of living persons and now need not to be banned. Rudy Saint (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can't just take your word for that. Please demonstrate your understanding. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not add too much personal information -and information without sources. All the contributions made will be from a neutral point of view. Rudy Saint (talk) 10:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you absolutely sure this (1) demonstrates you understand what you did wrong and (2) specifically demonstrates you now understand WP:BLP? I don't mean to trick you. My claim is that it obviously does neither of those things and instead, indicates you either aren't listening to us or can't understand the problem. If either of those things are true, we are just wasting our time with you and the reviewing admin should remove your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 10:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sure that I’ve understood

and I am neither just bluffing it nor wasting your time. Rudy Saint (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, it's clearly time to remove your talk page access. I will do so. The reviewing admin is free to reinstate talk page access if they think it appropriate. --Yamla (talk) 10:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.