User talk:Richielemay29

June 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richielemay29. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:CLNS Media, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Richielemay29. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Richielemay29|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Belbury (talk) 16:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do work for the company. I was unaware I wasn't supposed to make the draft in my User Page. The draft has been moved and I will continue to work on it from the draft articles page and request a review when I have completed, Thank you Richielemay29 (talk) 16:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Take a look at WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE for guidance on how to make sure that other Wikipedia editors understand the nature of your presence here. Belbury (talk) 16:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I put the paid template on your user page, since you disclosed here that you are employed by CLNS Media. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is draftified

You article has been moved to Draft:CLNS Media. Continue to work on it there, and submit for review when you're done. Don't try to publish this is article space yourself if you have any association with that company.

I have also deleted your user page because it redirected to a now-nonexistent article. See Wikipedia:User pages to learn the appropriate uses of your user page.

Also, you need to explain why you created two user accounts. User:Richielemay appears to be another account of yours. If you intend to abandon one, please say which one. You can have only one account. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw you write on Wikipedia:Teahouse that you want to abandon User:Richielemay. To abandon it, simply don't log into it anymore, and use one account exclusively from now on. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I won't log into that one anymore, Will only use this account, thank you Richielemay29 (talk) 16:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CLNS Media (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CLNS Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richielemay29! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]