User talk:Rex.1998D

This is Rex.1998D's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boitoi (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Laplorfill were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boitoi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boitoi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Laplorfill (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rex.1998D! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Laplorfill (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boitoi (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

most of the sources are press release or provided for by SRV Media, a digital marketing agency.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boitoi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boitoi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Boitoi

Hello, Rex.1998D. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boitoi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Boitoi

Hello, Rex.1998D. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boitoi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalkokkho (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalkokkho and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:32, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalkokkho (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://filmydon.in/kalkokkho-house-of-time-full-movie-download/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Kalkokkho may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the key person attached with this film. You can take reference from https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/52nd_International_Film_Festival_of_India

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_Indian_Bengali_films_of_2022

[1]https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1775661

Kalkokkho is one of the best film which was premiered at Bhushan Film Festival 2021.

There are many news about Kalkokkho movie.

[2]https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/sarmistha-maity-rajdeep-paul-kalkokkho-busan/article65840927.ece

[3]https://bengali.abplive.com/photo-gallery/entertainment/kalkokkho-movie-release-premier-was-attended-by-many-celebrities-913730

[4]https://www.indulgexpress.com/entertainment/cinema/2022/jul/29/rajdeep-paul-and-sarmishtha-maitis-kalkokkho-house-of-time-to-release-on-august-19-42759.html Rex.1998D (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kalkokkho

Hello, Rex.1998D,

This is not an article draft, it's a talk page comment. Please do not move incomplete pages like this into main space of the project. This does a disservice to our readers who expect well-written articles that are properly referenced, not some film buzz lines from IMDb. Wikipedia is not a platform for you to promote movies you like or have worked on. It's an encyclopedia about notable subjects and people.

If you have questions about article creation, Wikipedia's standards for notability or any questions about participating on the project, please bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you advice and support. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Rex.1998D! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kalkokkho moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kalkokkho, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Unsuitable for mainspace. scope_creep^Talk 15:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rex.1998D: Don't move this back into mainspace until its done. It is unsuitable in the mess its in at the moment. Please take a look at WP:REFB which is a wee tutorial to show you how to create proper in-line citations. scope_creep^Talk 15:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rex.1998D. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Kalkokkho, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Debasish Mondal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Debasish Mondal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://nsd.academia.edu/debasishmondal/CurriculumVitae. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 12:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Kalkokkho (House of Time). VickKiang (talk) 07:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not do it for any promotion or advertising. I just wanted to contribute Wikipedia. Rex.1998D (talk) 07:33, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this paragraph:

2020-21 has been the saga of an unknown paranoia that left its darkest and deepest scars in each and everyone’s life globally. In this epoch of survival-crisis and indefinite pause to life and living that the pandemic brought in, Aurora Film Corporation, India’s oldest functioning Cinema Producing and Distributing organization since 1906, the 116 years old company took the initiative to produce their new feature film, “KALKOKKHO” (House of Time) after a long break with new generation filmmakers, National Award winning Filmmaker-duo Rajdeep Paul and Sarmistha Maiti, both alumni of Satyajit Ray Film & Television Institute. “Kalkokkho” (House of Time) marks the return of the legendary Aurora Film Corporation led by the third generation custodian, director-producer Anjan Bose and also sets the prologue for the new era of cinema in Bengal to keep rolling with the support of best infrastructure of the studio system that Aurora is setting up in the City of Joy. A part of ‘Kalkokkho’ was shot on the new floor of Aurora Studio.

You promoted the company and film using the lines legendary, new era of cinema, best infrastructure, epoch of survival-crisis and indefinite pause of life. This is not how you write an encyclopedic article. You've been given a level 3 warning above and notices od copyvios, but even after numerous suggestions you continue to promote this film. Please write neutrally and without copyvios. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 07:38, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sir for your guidance. Rex.1998D (talk) 07:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalkokkho (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at House of Time instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalkokkho and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:08, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

House of Time moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, House of Time, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debasish Mondal (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Debasish Mondal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. I think I'm the third editor to point out that your edits are promotional, and that you likely have a conflict of interest, and may be a paid editor. The last is hard to prove, but the first is not: the draft that User:KylieTastic just declined was incredibly promotional. If you cannot start editing in a neutral and encyclopedic manner, using reliable and acceptable secondary sources, you are likely going to end up blocked. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Debasish Mondal

Hello, Rex.1998D. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Debasish Mondal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:House of Time

Hello, Rex.1998D. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:House of Time, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:House of Time

Hello, Rex.1998D. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "House of Time".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]