User talk:Redheiress
Redheiress, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Redheiress! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC) |
July 2016
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at TV Patrol, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Oripaypaykim (talk) 03:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Koreans in the Philippines. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 06:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Born for You and Bridges of Love]]. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 02:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to G-Dragon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Koreans in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highlight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Redheiress. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Bagani (TV series), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Strong Girl Bong-soon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexanderlee (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Alexanderlee (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Redheiress. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]February 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sandara Park, you may be blocked from editing. Sandara Park was singed to the label and has released music with them. Two editors stated this in the summary, stop removing without valid explanation. Take it to the article talk page if you disagree. Alex (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
As you stated, she "was signed" under the label but she isn't now, it would be better if you put (2004-2007) after her former agency in the Philippines. You can't see any sources that she is still and currently under Star Magic. The only article the says she is under Star Magic is her English article here in Wikipedia, you can't see it in Korean and other languages. She still has ties with the media in the Philippines but that doesn't mean she can still release albums outside YG. Redheiress (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
No. The parameter is for labels she has been signed to. So yes, it belongs there. And no, the years in parenthesis should not be added there, that's what gets mentioned in prose. Now again, stop removing it when you have repeatedly been asked not to and reason has been given. Alex (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
No. The reasons that were stated are contradicting. The moment the words "was signed" is strong enough to say she isn't under that agency. Redheiress (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Plus, her agency under her "Music Career" content labeled "Star" doesn't even exist. It is supposed to be "Star Magic", but she isn't still signed under either of those labels. Redheiress (talk) 05:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, she was signed to the label. Yes, that means she isn't anymore, however that is NOT a reason to remove from the Infobox. It is for all agencies/labels that she has been signed to, per template guidelines. She released music under Star Records, which is where "star" in the music career section links to. The "records" part is piped out per template guidelines. Again, STOP removing it. This is your final warning.
I have explained the reasons why and even provided links for it. I'm staying the fact. Redheiress (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- We list past and current labels in the infobox, do not revert again. Abdotorg (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)