Jump to content

User talk:Peshewapope

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please provide reliable sources for the content you are changing in the article. ... discospinster talk 00:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send me your email and i can give you all the documentation you want. Im tired of the hate. Clearly all of the changes they keep making are intended as slander. 71.213.174.28 (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are to be added to the article, not e-mailed to me. ... discospinster talk 00:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to United Remnant Band of the Shawnee Nation—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only removed or rewrote preexisting false information. Please return it to the way I had it. 71.213.174.28 (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at United Remnant Band of the Shawnee Nation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.   Aloha27  talk  01:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest (COI)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Peshewapope. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page United Remnant Band of the Shawnee Nation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Yuchitown (talk) 02:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

For the sake of a formal declaration, do you are are you connected in any way directly with the United Remnant Band of the Shawnee Nation, Shawnee Nation, United Remnant Band or the Zane Shawnee Caverns? --ARoseWolf 17:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
your fishing for more ways to silence me. Nice try Peshewapope (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually required and no, I'm not trying to silence you. COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia though not expressly forbidden. It is suggested you use to articles talk page to propose changes but they still have to gain consensus to be added. --ARoseWolf 18:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC) --edited 18:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look I know it seems like everyone is piling on you but I am seriously and have seriously been trying to help you avoid sanctions. Wikipedia policies can be difficult for new editors, especially for those that came here because they see something they think is wrong or missing and want to fix it. I don't believe that is wrong otherwise we should all be sanctioned. I saw things that I thought were wrong or missing when I first came here. I went about it the way I thought was right, BE BOLD. I was wrong and other editors helped me. No one here wants to silence you but we also don't want to go behind you making your edits compliant with policy or fixing articles you edited. Thus far, minus the personal attacks, I believe you were editing in good faith, even the edit warring. But at some point this turns into WP:IDHT territory and you become WP:NOTHERE. That will get you indefinitely blocked , something I hope to avoid. --ARoseWolf 18:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am working to compile all the sources needed to debunk the misinformation promoted here. I will do it the right way. I know you probably know very little about the subject matter in question, but this has been a long standing and coordinated effort to defame my people. Wiki is just one small facet of this web of lies I'm trying to unweave. Peshewapope (talk) 18:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is NOT necessary for editors to know anything about a topic, we only add content from reliable independent sources. You might need to read Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. Theroadislong (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Talk:United Remnant Band of the Shawnee Nation) for a period of 72 hours for continued personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 17:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thats just perfect. Now you censor me to avoid the truth. Yet another reason wiki is a completely unreliable resource for factual information. Peshewapope (talk) 17:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, nobody here ever suggests it is? Wikipedia merely reports what reliable independent sources say about a topic and it is those sources that you need to read. Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then file a complaint as I suggested. As they say, put your money where your mouth is. Doug Weller talk 17:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you are not blocked from other pages

[edit]

So you can complain about sources at WP:RSN or about Admins at WP:ANI. Doug Weller talk 17:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]