Jump to content

User talk:DoctorAro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, DoctorAro! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Peaceray. An edit that you recently made to R (programming language) seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 16:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray
Hi,
You just reverted my edits of the article on R since you interpreted my edits as a "test" that should be performed in the Wiki Sandbox. However, these edits were genuine and not a test. Please restore my edits unless you have any criticism against the contents of the edits.
Best,
DoctorAro DoctorAro (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, if you check the edit history, you will find out that I did not revert your edit. Another editor did that with the edit summary of Redundant sentence in opening paragraph.
You had added and it is frequently used by researchers in the social and medical sciences to perform statistical analyses of empirical data. plus a reference.
Note that medical sciences is a subset of of biology & chemistry, & bioinformatics mentioned earlier in the sentence. From the bioinformatics article:

Bioinformatics uses biology, chemistry, physics, computer science, computer programming, information engineering, mathematics and statistics to analyze and interpret biological data. The process of analyzing and interpreting data can sometimes be referred to as computational biology, however this distinction between the two terms is often disputed. To some, the term computational biology refers to building and using models of biological systems.

Furthermore, the first paragraph is complete in the focus for R:

R is a programming language for statistical computing and data visualization. It has been adopted in the fields of data mining, bioinformatics and data analysis.

That is mentioned here are disciplines that specifically focus on data & statistical analyses. This is not the primary focus of the social & medical sciences, although they may certainly use data to come to conclusions.
I would also refer you to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. It states The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic & that explanations may best be done at the end of the lead section to avoid cluttering and confusing the first paragraph.
Perhaps I should have instead used the {{Uw-mos1}} template to warn you.
Please note that you have a couple of experienced editors that have contested your change to the lead paragraph. As BOLD, revert, discuss cycle essay suggests, the appropriate place to take your request for a change to the lead paragraph would be the article talk page, Talk:R (programming language). Or perhaps there may be another location in the article to add your information. Peaceray (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are many forms of medical research that are not covered by "biology, chemistry, and bioinformatics", such as survey and register-based research and various forms of experimental research. Indeed, few medical researchers would identify with the term "bioinformatics". I know this because I am a researcher myself, and I have conducted medical research as well as social-science research. When I do research with colleagues at various universities, we use R, and I know, from my own experience, that this is a very common practice in many research teams. I do not know what the particular expertise of these experienced editors is, but if they claim that "bioinformatics" is generally understood as an umbrella term covering medical research, or if they suggest that R is only rarely used by researchers in the medical and social sciences, I challenge them.
Also, the sentences that were already in the paragraph are not formulated in an optimal way. Most conspicuously, "data analysis" is not an academic field but step in the research process that is common to many different academic fields. Therefore, I not only maintain that my edits should be added, but I suggest that the second sentence in the "old" version of the introductory paragraph should be reformulated as well.
Thank you for highlighting that changes to introductory paragraphs should be suggested in the "talk page" and not made immediately. I am a relatively inexperienced Wikipedia editor (I have mostly edited the Swedish version of Wikipedia previously). I will try to remember to suggest changes to introductory paragraphs in the "talk pages" from here on. DoctorAro (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]