User talk:Paulthomas2
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Paulthomas2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DS (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for spotting User:Ihateyougrace -- I've blocked the account now. If you need to report vandalism urgently, you can do so at the vandalism noticeboard, where it can be seen by admins who can pick it up and take action. Again, thanks, -- The Anome (talk) 21:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
With regards to the 3O you offered at 16:10 - there has been a development. Namely, User:Acoriofs (the other editor in the dispute) has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a previous disruptive editor at the same article. Although that sort of renders the dispute moot, I'd still appreciate it if you could offer your opinion on User:Acoriofs' viewpoint (which he managed to post before the block), as well as the couple of edits to the article since then by other users. Cheers! Indrek (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You are one of four editors who inspected/declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justin P. Wayoro for reasons other than blatant copyvio. This article was merely a bunch of text cobbled together from various sites. Step one in reviewing an article for creation should be to dump a string into google to see if it is a copyvio. If it is, the text should be immediately removed and an inspection of any images should be undertaken. In this case, the style of writing should have set of all sorts of copyvio alarm bells in your mind. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. It was written so poorly, I didn't think to check for that. Paulthomas2 (talk) 19:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Logaholic
[edit]Hello,
You just declined Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Logaholic and suggested that I add Logaholic to List of web analytics software. I already did this a week ago, but my contribution was deleted almost immediately. Logaholic wasn't notable enough for that list(according to the reviewer), because it didn't even has it's own article. Logaholic has millions of users worldwide, it sure is a software program that does belong in that list. What do you recommend that I do now?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvdvelde (talk • contribs) 13:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to re-add it to the list. The reviewer's logic is a bit flawed. There are tons of redlinks and links to companies. Also, with 425K hits on a google search, it's certainly notable. I just didn't think there was enough content in the AfC submission to justify its own page. Paulthomas2 (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
diff text is an original implementation yet you discarded it
[edit]The implementation behind Diff Text has 2 - 3 truly original ideas that improve the computer science longest common subsequence algorithm.
On these grounds you should reconsider your rejection of the article on it.
Anyway can try out the software using any web browser for free and verify its claims.
It detects moves. Properly. Without guessing. Without getting it wrong half the time.
I have compared its implementation to the one in Microsoft Word. Diff Text spots ALL THE TEXT MOVEMENTS.
Microsoft Word is quicker but it fails to spot all the movements.
THIS IS AN ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION TO COMPUTER SCIENCE YET YOU REJECTED IT.
The implementation is original.
So you reject an article even though it references an original contribution to computer science algorithm because it has no references, but anyone can verify its claims for free just by visiting the website.
It needs no references because once you visit the website you can enter your text and get it to perform the diff.
IT DETECTS TEXT MOVEMENTS PROPERLY ALL THE TIME AND IN A WAY THAT IF two possible movements are possible the one picked is the best one.
Please thing again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diff-text (talk • contribs) 15:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I see that you're new here at Wikipedia, so I'm going to respond to your question as dispassionately as I can. There are several things problematic with your submission.
- Given your username and edit history, it seems you have a potential conflict of interest with respect to this article and are likely involved in some way with the diff-text website/project.
- There exist three core content policies at Wikipedia that we try to maintain and expect others to maintain. They are: 1) Neutral point of view, 2) Verifiability and 3) No original research. Your contribution is at odds with those policies. While it may be true that the algorithm is new and unique, unless there are reliable sources to verify that claim, the claim can't be made without constituting original research.
- If you still believe that I am in error, please resubmit to articles for creation. You have my word that I will not comment further on your submission and will allow other wikipedia editors to assess the article. Regards Paulthomas2 (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thanks for your reply
[edit]If you look at the Wikipedia WinMerge entry at
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Winmerge
You will find there is not much more independent sources backing that up. They have an entry in Lifehacker. My one has an entry in HVG Weekly.
I had an idea how to make an algorithm detect moved text. It works. In its own small way it is an original idea.
To verify what I said, anyone can use the free software or even just look at the attached screenshot.
It is a piece of free software that works. You will find lots of software entry articles on Wikipedia without hard verifiable sources backing them up. WinMerge is one.
If you have to have a source backing up a claim that is very easy to prove in a few minutes just by using the software then it is wrong.
It is just like having a source trying to prove Paris is the capital of France.
I had an original idea. It is a small contribution to the world. I just want to get news of it out. This is not commerical. Anyone can use it for free.
Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diff-text (talk • contribs) 22:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
afc
[edit]- I did not delete the AfC for Rauschenburger. I just removed the copyvio and rewrote the lede paragraph, and sent it back to the original author for details. We do not delete articles for copyvio unless the entire article is copyvio, or so much of it that it can be readily removed. DGG ( talk ) 06:46, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
AFC
[edit]
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from January 1st, 2013 – Febuary 1st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
My submission on Waman P Bhonsle
[edit]Hi Paul,
The person about whom I have submitted the article, Waman P Bhonsle, is one of the foremost movie editors in the Indian film industry, popularly known as Bollywood.
I did not clearly understand the reason of decline now. Can you please help me understand what "wikify" means?
Thanks Panish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.210.239 (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Panish, I'll take a closer look at it this weekend and give you some assistance. With the holidays rapidly approaching, my weekdays/nights are way too busy. More later, Paulthomas2 (talk) 20:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hello Paul
Thanks for reviewing my submission, I've read so many wikipedia article/guidelines/help pages etc.. i"m just not getting the jist of creating this page. I'm really not sure if the external links are really footnotes...? any additional feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks again for your taking the time to assist.
Kind Regards, (CMG2012 (talk) 20:42, 20 December 2012 (UTC))
- CMG2012, I'll take a closer look at it this weekend and give you some assistance. With the holidays rapidly approaching, my weekdays/nights are way too busy. More later, Paulthomas2 (talk) 20:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Regarding my recent article
[edit]Hello Paulthomas2,
Thanks for reviewing my recent article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raptivity, and your suggestions. I have made few changes. So, do take a look when you get a chance.
Happy holidays and new year! RM (talk) 11:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Jean Michel Gibert - submission for a wikipedia article
[edit]Hi Paul
Just a reminder, as soon as you can offer some help. hope you holidays went well.
Regards, Michele
CMG2012 (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
My article submission on Waman Bhonsle
[edit]Hi Paul,
Trust you had a good holiday vacation. Wish you a very happy new year. Was wondering if you could help me on my article. As I had mentioned to you earlier I had made the changes you had recommended. Would be great if you could suggest to me the next steps.
Best Panish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.82.187 (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
My article submission on Waman Bhonsle
[edit]Hi Paul,
Earnestly looking forward to your review of my article..I have made the changes as recommended by you.
Best Panish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.140.34 (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
My Submission - hpurasinghe
[edit]Hi Paulthomas2,
Just want to let you know, I have linked verifiable references to all areas concern. Hope the document is in order now. Many thanks for your feedback. Appreciate very much.
Harsha Purasinghe
Hpurasinghe (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
Appreciate very much if you can review my revised page now. I have done the required references as you requested.
Harsha Hpurasinghe (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Paulthomas,
I have re-edited my post with all required references. Appreciate very much if you can review this again.
Harsha Purasinghe
15:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Hpurasinghe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpurasinghe (talk • contribs)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ben Caplan & The Casual Smokers
[edit]Dear Paulthomas2:
I was reviewing submissions at the Afc and I came across one that has what looks like a decline from you that didn't quite work. I'm not sure if it never did decline properly, or if the user accidentally deleted something. Could you look at it? The page is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ben Caplan & The Casual Smokers. Thanks. —Anne Delong (talk) 04:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jean Michel Gibert - submission for a wikipedia article
[edit]Hi Paul
Can you review and comment.
Regards,
Michele CMG2012 (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Review!
[edit]Hi Paulthomas2,
Can you please review my submission since I have made available the required references for verification purpose.
Thank you,
Harsha Purasinghe Hpurasinghe 17:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpurasinghe (talk • contribs)
WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Delivered at 13:05, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Paulthomas2:
WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
[edit]Hello Paulthomas2! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
- This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
[edit]Hello Paulthomas2:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Neil Kelleher, September 2012.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Neil Kelleher, September 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gordon Hammes ACS Biochemistry Lectureship
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gordon Hammes ACS Biochemistry Lectureship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.divbiolchem.org/awards/nominations/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Mass spectrometry software list
[edit]Dear Paulthomas2.
Could I ask for your help as an active participant of Mass spectrometry wikiproject. I would add some software I have written to the List of mass spectrometry software page. I believe that is a pretty interesting and unusual software for community. By the nature it is open source web-service (web-site with API) to call for pieces (like chromatograms or spectra) of raw mass spectrometry data located at web-site. I can't do it myself since it breaks conflict of interest rule (Yes, I signed with my real name :( ). I described this software on the talk page for List of mass spectrometry software, but I think there is not such a much activity on that.
Thank you very much in advance. With respect, Yaroslav Lyutvinskiy (talk) 14:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Paulthomas2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Paulthomas2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |