User talk:Padreburgos2020

Welcome!

Hi Padreburgos2020! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lolito Go (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lolito Go and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Padreburgos2020! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lolito Go

Hello, Padreburgos2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lolito Go, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lolito Go

Hello, Padreburgos2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lolito Go".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I receive this notice:

"This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page."

What should I do? Padreburgos2020 (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this does not require admin help, since there's no administrative action required. However, now that I'm here, I'm happy to answer.

You don't say which article this message refers to so I can't answer with specifics, but looking at your recent creations Lolito Go, Sofronio Vasquez and Poppert Bernadas, there is a lot of unreferenced information in all of them.

Articles on living people (WP:BLP) have particularly strict referencing requirements for privacy etc. reasons. Every time you make a statement that someone could question – which, let's face it, is pretty much any statement – it must be clearly supported by an inline citation to a reliable published source. This citation must come immediately after the statement, either at the end of the sentence or short paragraph, so that the reader doesn't have to wonder which source supports that statement. The same is true of any direct quotations, as well as all private personal and family details, such as date of birth (see WP:DOB), names of family members, etc. As a bare minimum, each paragraph must have at least one citation, and quite possibly several (one is only enough for a short paragraph, and only if the source cited actually provides all the information given in that paragraph).

Please go through your articles and support them better. Any information which you cannot support with a reliable source must be removed.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for taking time answering my query. This is very helpful. I will go through my creations now and work on your suggested revisions. Padreburgos2020 (talk) 14:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poppert Bernadas moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Poppert Bernadas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]