User talk:Only699WordsToGo

Moshe Kasher, Tim Ryan Endorsement

well by what it looks like, it seems that he really does like Tim Ryan

January 2020

Hi Only699WordsToGo. I wanted to let you know that political endorsements must meet all three of these criteria:

The endorser must have an article or be unquestionably entitled to one
This endorsement must be covered by reliable and independent sources
Coverage of the endorsement needs to use the word endorse, or other closely related synonym.

This is covered by the consensus at WP:ERFC.

For that reason, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, poker websites, and blogs are not acceptable sources. Also, donating to a campaign or showing up to a campaign rally are not endorsements. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you - Mr X 🖋 16:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Only699WordsToGo (a SpongeBob joke, right?). To bring some more context to the above, I'd advise you to read the closing summary at WP:ENDORSERFC. The community has collaboratively decided to adopt the above criteria for innumerable reasons, but amongst them are our policies that information on Wikipedia must be true, legal issues arise if we label individuals too hastily and that reliable secondary sources tell us how much content is fair to include about any particular event. I reverted you in this edit and this was a mistake of mine; reading WP:ENDORSERFC more closely, I realised that the second criterion only applies to individuals and not to organizations. I'm sorry that I made this mistake, and another user kindly re-added Dream Defenders. But your comment Glad we had to jump through hoops to add an endorsement that we all new was legitimate. Good criteria! is not helpful and it would be good for everyone if you made sure that any new entries you add meet (a) all three of the criteria, if it's an individual or (b) the first and third criterion, if it's an organization. Otherwise your contribution will be undone and it's a waste of everyone's time, when there's a huge variety of improvements to Wikipedia we could all be making.

To pre-empt a possible response of yours, "why do other things not follow these criteria?", that's because Wikipedia is a work in progress, the criteria were established recently and because we need help tidying up many pages. Feel free to help us in enforcing these criteria. — Bilorv (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American politics discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]