User talk:Mr Nerd 96

Welcome!

Hello, Mr Nerd 96, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:NSM Public School, Vijayawada, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 13:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:NSM Public School, Vijayawada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:NSM Public School, Vijayawada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 13:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sir, this is the first page I am creating on Wikipedia, I am trying to edit the article now in a neutral way , i have read some rules, and i am still learning, if there are any corrections let me know,, i will edit the for sure, please remove the nomination for speedy deletion, thank u in advance Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 13:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Mr Nerd 96. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mr Nerd 96|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

Much of your text is unreferenced

You don't tell us how many students or staff there are

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Such as the school that was to make a name for itself.

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

Only one wikilink, not even New Delhi

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Most of your text was copied from here Copyright © 2023 NSM PUBLIC SCHOOL and here, © 2023 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Both clearly marked as copyright. For legal reasons, copyright text will not be restored Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on NSM Public School, Vijayawada

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page NSM Public School, Vijayawada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rakesh Varre moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rakesh Varre. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Doesn't meet [[WP::GNG]]. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Endrabcwizart (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once check now I added 3 references, would it meet the criteria now? Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you must follow the Wikipedia gudilenen for article. please read WP:GNG WP:WBA and WP:BIO . if you have any confusion, you can get help from Wikipedia teahouse Endrabcwizart (talk) 05:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)e[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rakesh Varre (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rakesh Varre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr Nerd 96! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mr Nerd 96! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:45, Monday, February 12, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mr Nerd 96! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:13, Monday, February 12, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

June 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/mam I have added the reason for unblock in my page kindly review it and post your opinion, Thank you in advance. Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 01:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr Nerd 96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected sir/mam i have not received any monetary benifits for editing NSM Public School, Vijayawada or any other pages, I joined wikipedia to contribute something to the world from my side, at first I didnt know how to edit articles, later on I learnt the rules and am still learning, i created pages which I thought should be on wikipedia, Regarding the page of NSM Public School, I studied in that school almost 15 years back and now I am not anyway related to the school and I personally think that doesn't belong to Conflict of interest, regarding other pages like Bandi Saroj Kumar and Rakesh Varre, I watched their movies and liked their performances and wanted to know more information about them and came to wikipedia, unfortunately I found no information, so I thought it would be helpful for other persons like me who are searching info for these people and created pages for them. I hereby confirm that I have not received any monetary benefits from any of the pages I edited.Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 01:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't know if you are a paid editor or not, but your editing is such that it certainly appears that you are or that you have some conflict of interest. Even accepting your word that you don't, you don't yet know enough about Wikipedia to write a new article that meets the most basic requirements for style and sourcing, so you won't be unblocked to create new articles. We'll need to know what edits you intend to make instead. 331dot (talk) 07:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2nd Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr Nerd 96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. I understood now that i have been blocked for creating pages with conflict of intrest like being a fan to an actor or supporting the school i studied as they resembled paid editing, i have realised my mistake and will not repeat the same, i have contributed to many other wiki articles with significant importance and will improve edits with neutral opinion. I would avoid these kind of editing in future but if this kind of situation comes again I would disclose conflict of interest by adding relevant COI templates in it.I also ask the reviewer to tell me my mistakes if i missed any and requesting to lift the block. Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 09:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else will review your request, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 07:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rakesh Varre

Hello, Mr Nerd 96. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rakesh Varre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr Nerd 96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected sir/madam,

I have read and understand the Terms of Use and the paid editing disclosure requirements. I understand that I have been blocked for creating pages that appeared to have a conflict of interest, such as pages about actors I admire or the school I attended. I recognize that these actions might have resembled paid editing or undisclosed advocacy, even though I did not receive any monetary benefits for these edits.

I acknowledge my mistakes and am committed to not repeating them. Moving forward, I will avoid editing topics where I might have a personal interest, or if I do, I will disclose any potential conflicts of interest by using the relevant COI templates.

In my future contributions, I will focus on improving existing articles rather than creating new ones, ensuring that all my edits adhere strictly to Wikipedia’s guidelines for style and sourcing. I am keen to make useful, constructive contributions to Wikipedia and am eager to learn from any feedback provided by administrators.

If there are any specific mistakes I made that I have not yet addressed, I would appreciate guidance on those so that I can fully understand and correct my approach.

I have also read the blocking policy and this block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption.

Thank you for considering my request. I assure you that my intentions are to contribute positively and responsibly to the Wikipedia community.

Sincerely,

Mr Nerd 96 Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request reads like it was created by AI. You need to be more specific. You should say what topics you want to edit. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 17:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Parakramam moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Parakramam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and please see WP:CRYSTAL. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parakramam (movie 2024).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parakramam (movie 2024).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

4th Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr Nerd 96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Answering the question asked by the administrator, I would like to edit wikipedia on topics related to Vijayawada, Indian cinema, Tollywood, Physiology, Science and topics related to Medicine which i believe have sound knowledge on. Thank you Mr Nerd 96 Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 11:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: it's been one month and nobody is not responding to my unblock request, wiki guidelines days it will not take more than 2 weeks to review, someone please help me out I'm stuck here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Nerd 96 (talk • contribs)

There is no guarantee of any specified period of time for unblock requests to be reviewed. Administrators are all volunteers, and the queue of unblock requests is lengthy. Some unblock requests take several weeks before they are reviewed, or in extreme cases, several months. Sorry if you think it's unfair but there is nothing you can do except wait your turn. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drm310: Thank you for your understanding and kind words. Really appreciate it sir. I will wait.Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 04:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Sir/Mam its been very long time i am waiting for my block request to be reviewed. Since nobody is helping me out I am pinging you as block log shows your name. It's almost 2 months please review the block and unblock me if you believe i understood wikipedia policies and will not do the mistake in future.

Deletion discussion about Rakesh Varre

Hello Mr Nerd 96, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rakesh Varre, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakesh Varre (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mangalyam (2022 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mangalyam (2022 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangalyam (2022 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mangalyam 2022 film.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mangalyam 2022 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5th Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mr Nerd 96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have been blocked due to Undisclosed paid editing in violation of the WMF Terms of Use, ignored COI disclosure requests and continued editing NSM Public School, Vijayawada, in addition to potentially UPE-edits at Bandi Saroj Kumar, Rakesh Varre. I have realised my mistake Sir/Mam its been very long time i am waiting for my block request to be reviewed.It's almost 4 months and every time I post the unblock request it is going stale as it's not reviewed for more than 1 month and declining request as procedural decline only, please review the block and unblock me if you believe i understood wikipedia policies and will not do the mistake in future I would like to edit wikipedia on topics related to Vijayawada, Indian cinema, Tollywood, Physiology, Science and topics related to Medicine which i believe have sound knowledge on and will not edit the topics i have been blocked for. I do believe this block is no more necessary as I would not disrupt wikipedia integrity in future Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 4:27 am, 21 September 2024, Saturday (2 months, 27 days ago) (UTC−8)

Accept reason:

It appears to me that the below discussion was trending toward an unblock, but it just kind of fizzled out. This is not entirely surprising as requests for unblock are regularly badly backlogged and it's hard to keep tabs on every one of them, but I think it is past time for a second chance here. Please do heed the advice you've been given, and welcome back. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 18:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this is getting better. We're at least no longer talking to an AI. Can you please read WP:COI, especially WP:PAY, another time? You acknowledge that your edits have been problematic but "potentially UPE" doesn't tell us anything. Was this undisclosed paid editing? What is your relationship to these topics? -- asilvering (talk) 01:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@El Beeblerino Thank you for unblocking me, means a lot. I will follow the advice given. Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 02:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering: Thank you for the response, I have read WP:COI and WP:PAY again and here is my explanation. I understand that my edits do look like potential UPE but in reality I do have COI which I don't know that I have to mention at that time, here is the relation between those articles and me

1.NSM Public School, Vijayawada: I studied in this school and thought that it would be nice if my school had a Wikipedia page

2.Bandi Saroj Kumar: He is an actor and director from tollywood, I liked his movies and when I searched him on wiki in didn't find info so I thought of creating a page for him and my judgement was wrong here, even though I read the rules for creating a page for a person like if he is an actor how many movies he should make like that and he cleared most of these rules but may be I liked his movies more that's why I invested a lot of time for creating a page for him out of pure fandom. Which i realised now is a big mistake because in wiki we should always be in a neutral point of view, and i should have mentioned COI for the article.

3.Rakesh Varre: He is a character artist also from tollywood, me being a movie freak watches lots of movies so while I was searching for a famous movie named bahubali I saw cast names and all of them have blue links except this person, then i thought he is a good artist why not create a page for him and went on creating one for him, i actually learnt creating pages in this process. I don't know at that time I must mention COI and more over it looks like a potential UPE, my bad. Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 02:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Sir/Mam its been very long time i am waiting for my block request to be reviewed. Since nobody is helping me out I am pinging you as block log shows your name. It's almost 4 months please review the block and unblock me if you believe i understood wikipedia policies and will not do the mistake in future. Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Mr Nerd 96! Can you provide some examples of edits you would like to make if you were to be unblocked? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure mam, here are the following examples I would like to make if unblocked:

1) correct any spelling mistakes if I came across them on wikipedia.

2) correct any factual errors with proper references to actual if I came across them.

3) topics i think I know are medicine, physiology, Indian cinemas, etc Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 02:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: what do you think? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is sounding much better to me. Rosguill, what are your thoughts? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do think we're on the path to an unblock, but I do want to note some concerns

It seems like Mr Nerd 96 is over-apologizing and claiming to have done COI/UPE even in cases where it actually doesn't appear to apply. Being a fan of an actor doesn't normally cause a COI--the concern was the edits made appeared promotional; the appropriate course of action would have been to explain how/why you made the edits to Rakesh Varre, etc. The only example of editing that appears to have actually been a case of COI was the editing of the NSM Public School. I would want to see a clearer indication of having understood the relevant guidelines.
This isn't an obstacle to being unblocked at this time, but I would recommend not prioritizing spelling-correction or other copyediting work based on the level of English proficiency demonstrated here. The commitment to fixing referencing, factual errors, or contributing to topics like physiology, medicine, and Indian cinema seem like better areas of work to focus on (although be mindful of WP:MEDRS, medicine is one of the trickier topics to edit).

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to Rosguill

Sir/mam,

Rakesh varre is a notable actor according to WP:NACTOR, he has 11 movies on wiki which mentioned his name in cast section, you can check here Draft:Rakesh Varre all the movie are listed in filmography click on individual film and check, He even had multiple individual references. These all made me believe that he is eligible for an article on wikipedia.

Regarding NSM Public School, It was my first article at that time I didn't knew the rules so I went on copy pasting from the primary source, so many violations happened like copy right violation, not in a neutral tone, promotional,COI etc, I tried to correct most of my mistakes when I got to know about them, but to be frank it's a mistake because I must go through all the guidelines before creating a page.

Thank you for the suggestions, I would try to follow them. Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 19:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Parakramam

Hello, Mr Nerd 96. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parakramam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]