User talk:Mr Neil Jenkins

Welcome!

Hello, Mr Neil Jenkins, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 15:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Provoke Solutions (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

the panda ₯’ 11:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Provoke Solutions (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Provoke Solutions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 15:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mr Neil Jenkins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 15:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Provoke Solutions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Provoke Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 03:28, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. I can do no better than repeat the AFC comments

Comment: Nothing in this draft says "Notable". Everything says "Exists". There is work to do here. Since the previous review you have rearranged some deckchairs, but seem to be ignoring the iceberg.
:*References that are regurgitated PR pieces and press releases do nothing to help your cause. Please inspect all your referencing and lose those that do not meet the following criteria. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42.
:*Even then you may have to realise that the org is just not notable. Many orgs aren't notable ether. Fiddle Faddle 15:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Being a Microsoft partner, no matter at what "level" is not sufficient grounds for notability. A listing of partnerships with other manufacturers is simply promotion. Wikipedia is an ENCYCLOPEDIA of notable topics, not a business directory the panda ₯’ 11:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: provide services including cloud solutions, content management, business integration, portals & collaboration, workflow, mobility, custom software, unified communication and cross-platform integration.
it's all about what the company sells and its awards, little about the company itself other than locations. Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
... in our draft page, in order for us to review... Mr Neil Jenkins (talk) 11:30 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0) Provoke Solutions — You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject, and you should not be editing on behalf of a company. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

I will restore the text here shortly. Please do not let the text just sit there, or I will delete it again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mr Neil Jenkins. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Provoke Solutions, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:01, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Mr Neil Jenkins/sandbox

Hello, Mr Neil Jenkins. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Mr Neil Jenkins/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]