User talk:Moviebuff323

Donald Trump

Hi Moviebuff323. Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, your edit at Donald Trump replaced good sources with bad. Breitbart is not considered a reliable source, especially for biographies of living people. You also should not have removed the New York Times and BBC sources. Please read WP:RS and use the article talk page to discuss your changes with the other editors involved in editing the article. Thank you. - Mr X 00:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr X. Sorry for the mistake and thank you for being so kind in correcting me. - Moviebuff323 (talk) 00:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Your help editing the article is appreciated. I hope to see you in some of the talk page discussions.- Mr X 01:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Goodman (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

This will still need any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall to satisfy WP:CREATIVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Goodman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister Is the issue that the sources are not reliable? Because if that's what's being argued, I would strongly disagree about the sources not being reliable. Deadline Hollywood, The Hollywood Reporter, and Variety are major publications across the U.S., especially the film industry. However, if the issue is that there are not enough sources covering the issue, then that's another topic. Now, I do not know Mr. Goodman personally, but I do think that the former president of one of biggest Hollywood studios, Paramount Pictures, is a notable figure. - Moviebuff323 (talk) 23:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's simply that still needs any additional sources as mentioned above for enhancement and solidity. SwisterTwister talk 01:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added 4 additional sources for a total of 7 verifiable sources. I've resubmitted. Moviebuff323 (talk) 14:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Goodman (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All in all, the new sources still do not adequately satisfy the raised concerns.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Goodman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

T v x1 16:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Moviebuff323, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! T v x1 16:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Goodman has been accepted

Adam Goodman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dustin Kahia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dustin Kahia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dustin Kahia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dustin Kahia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fitindia (talk) 14:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dustin Kahia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dustin Kahia.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, Moviebuff323. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Dustin Kahia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Surayeproject3 (talk) 00:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Conflict of Interest Accusation

I want to firmly and unequivocally state that I do not have a conflict of interest regarding this Wikipedia article, nor do I have any personal connection to the subject. My interest in independent films has led me to contribute to various film-related pages over time, though my editing activity has decreased due to time constraints. However, I still make occasional edits to pages I find valuable to ensure accuracy and adherence to Wikipedia’s standards.

The reason I originally reverted your edit was not out of bias but because it introduced an assertion regarding the subject’s heritage that lacked reliable sourcing. Wikipedia’s core principles require verifiability, and at the time, there were no reputable sources confirming the claim that the individual is of Assyrian descent. The only verifiable sources I could find explicitly listed the subject’s heritage as Chaldean, not Assyrian. Without solid references, it would be improper to make such a change.

I understand that there is an ongoing debate regarding the distinction (or lack thereof) between Chaldean and Assyrian identity. However, Wikipedia is not a place for personal interpretations or historical debates; it is a platform for verifiable facts backed by reliable sources. If there are no credible sources confirming the claim, then the edit should not be made. Additionally, upon reviewing related Wikipedia pages, I noticed that similar assertions about Assyrian identity were also unsourced, reinforcing the need for caution.

Ultimately, my position is based on Wikipedia’s core policies: verifiability, neutrality, and reliable sourcing. This is not about my personal views but about ensuring that information on Wikipedia is factual and supported by legitimate sources. If credible sources emerge that substantiate the claim, I would have no issue with the edit. Until then, we should adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines and avoid unsourced assertions.

I hope this clarifies my position. If you have sources that definitively support your claim, I am open to reviewing them, but as of now, the edit does not meet Wikipedia’s verifiability standards. MovieBuff (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see talk page of the article for my response. Surayeproject3 (talk) 00:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]