User talk:Morning star

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 00:37, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Baltasar Gracián

Do I understand that you deliberately dumped a bunch of Spanish language text into the English-language Wikipedia, so that either someone has to clean up after you promptly or we have to delete it? That seems rather unproductive. All you are doing is making work for other people. Yes, certainly a worthwhile topic, and if you want to do the translation yourself, great, but if you are making a translation request, the place to do that is WP:TIE (or even Wikipedia:Spanish Translation of the Week) and let someone get to it when they have the time, instead of creating something that will be deleted in 2 weeks if no one fixes it. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:35, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

So do you actually plan to work on this where you put it, or do you just want to put in a request through a more normal channel (in which case I'll probably just turn Baltasar Gracián into a stub)? (Either approach is equally OK, just let me know which way you want to go.) -- Jmabel | Talk 02:03, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

Template:Fascism sidebar

While the actual template is a good idea (similar to Template:Communism sidebar for that series of articles), could we get a better image of the fasces for the template? I think it's a bit out of place to use an image taken from the U.S. Mercury dime. Firebug 15:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! I've found a different image, but there might be one more directly relevant, to Fascism, available. — Morning star 16:30, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ward Churchill

Hi: I think that User:Zen-master's wholesale reversion of your edit was a bit harsh given the amount of useful material that you added and I have mentioned this to him. I agree with what he has to say about the importance of the essay controversy with quotations so I would hope that this material will stay in the main article. The reversion, however, deleted a lot of useful stuff that you added (the details of Churchill's degree topic and all the bibliographic data, for examples) so would you please add those back in. I would do it myself but it is after 01:00 local time and I must away to my bed. --Theo (Talk) 00:09, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pleasant reply and good job on restoring the good stuff. I feel that the article is much improved by your intervention. Those page size warnings are grossly misleading now. But no harm was done. --Theo (Talk) 10:02, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Theo : for your thanks, and your encouragement. —Morning star 12:51, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I understand why you moved the text to a sub-article, but I would be careful about making major changes like this to controversial articles without raising it first on the Talk page -- and this has been a very controversial article as you can see from the page history and Talk page. Anyway, the 32Kb article size was a more important consideration a few years ago, when some browsers couldn't edit texts larger than that and truncated them, but that no longer appears to be a problem. That being said, it is worth asking whether articles longer than can be shortened, refactored as we say, because most people have short attention spans these days. -- Viajero 13:31, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The apparent assumption of malice by one editor in the face of several assertions of good faith should not bother you. You seem to be doing just fine to me; and your ready recognition of areas for improvement is a strength that does you great credit. In my opinion there are at least three things that need no repetition on Wikipedia: 1. Reversion. 2. Apology. 3. Defensive explanation. Those who accept good faith do not need it (repetition, that is) and those that do not will be strengthened in their hostility. --Theo (Talk) 22:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again, Theo : sage advice. —Morning star 00:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hello, good sir

http://www.geocities.com/njtankfarm/

Template: Kurosawa

I took the liberty of "picking up the ball and running with it" on the Kurosawa template you created:

I inserted it into all the Akira Kurosawa film pages (except of course the 3 that don't have an article at all yet: Scandal (film), Record of a Living Being, and Rhapsody in August)
I twiddled all the things that needed to be twiddled in the template to get it to work "properly" (that is, if viewing the page of movie XYZ, then the entry for "XYZ" in the template should be displayed black and bold, and not blue as a clickable link). Usually this just meant adjusting the actual page name in the link to be correct. In some cases, xxxx_(movie) had given way to xxxx_(film); in other cases the name was slightly different (The One Most Beautiful --> The Most Beautiful, etc.). That was an issue because the template only works completely "properly" in the above sense if the title is an exact match, not a redirect.
I hope the result was what you had in mind when you created the template.

--IslandGyrl 00:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

George Michael

I don't know how, but for some reason you made a mess of the George Michael page. (not on purpose I think). Many 's and other symbols were changed. Like Español turned into Espa�ol. Either way I reverted it but kept your new disambiguation part. Maybe you can figure out what happened. Garion96 (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Garion96 (talk) 20:33, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scholars of Marxism

Your wish is my command. Help populate it :-). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 07:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Myatt references

:-) You're welcome! Jude (talk,contribs,email) 06:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of diaphragm and axis in WW2 context

Hi there. About the article you added recently, The Rome-Berlin Axis, would you be able to help disambiguate two links you created? It is the title of chapter 4: This Berlin-Rome Line is not a Diaphragm but rather an Axis - you linked to diaphragm and axis, but both of these are disambiguation pages. Would you know, from the context of the chapter, what the author or the original quote means by diaphragm and axis? I have some ideas, but don't want to prejudice what you think. You could add your thoughts here if you wanted. Thanks. Carcharoth 15:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch fascists

Could you please explain why you added Cornelis van Geelkerken, Anton Mussert and Meinoud Rost van Tonningen to List of fascists? I've removed them recently bacause they were no fascists, but national socialists.--Willem Huberts 12:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a vote

Hi Morning star,

I saw you contributed to one of the articles (now I've forgotten which one -- was it Willmoore Kendall??) of a conservative. That page has a link to the "American conservatives" category page, which is now the subject of a vote on whether to delete it as a category. I thought you might have an interest in whether or not it should stay, so I invite you to take a look at the category page and click on the box up top to contribute to the decision, which could be made in the next couple of days. Right now the vote is tied.Noroton 23:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested

Hi again Morning,

Thanks for your vote on keeping the American conservatives category, it won by a 2:1 margin. You might have an interest in an article I've just created Pre-Iraq War opinions on Saddam. It's poorly named (something I want to change) but as it stands now, it's essentially statements made by public officials and opinion leaders from across the political spectrum about how dangerous Saddam's regime was considered before the war. The article is being proposed for deletion, but I of course think it's useful. I'd be interested to know what you think.Noroton 01:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Da Ali G Show

That is funny timing. Gotcha. ;-) I'll put in screenshots soon (if it still needs it). What'll really be cool is making individual pages for the episodes and including a few funny quotes. One thing I was debating was how to order the summaries. I did mine in the same order as they appear in the episode, but it might be better to always do Ali G, Borat, Bruno, Interview or something. - Peregrinefisher 23:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added images to the filled in entries. If you'll finish the summaries I'll finish the images. There's a rule against images without summaries. Also, it looks better if the colon goes inside the bolding for interviewees. I've probably put hundreds of colons outside the bolding myself, but I finally decided to look at the result and it looks better inside. By the way, love the Umlaüts! - Peregrinefisher 18:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If we add more to each episode, it should probably in a seperate page for each episode. - Peregrinefisher 19:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and created a page for Law (Da Ali G Show). We could make it how we like, and then use it as a template for the rest. - Peregrinefisher 19:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Morning star (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

208.54.95.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Blocking administrator: Dmcdevit (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Please provide the block message so we can find the block. -- Yamla 18:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. —Morning star 19:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 208.54.95.1 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: —— Eagle 101 ^{(Need help?)} 06:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

—— Eagle 101 ^{(Need help?)} 06:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reinrassig

Looking for help from a knowledgeable editor - came across this page Reinrassig while adding categories. See from your profile you might know this stuff. Is it right? I couldn't see it in German Wiki or German Wikitionary so thinking maybe the word was not spelled quite right or something. Any idea (or know who would know)? Obina 10:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 208.54.95.1 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Yamla 19:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the problems. --Yamla 19:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error: Block ID not found. It may have been unblocked already.

There's no block for you, it's just the IP. I'll see about getting things changed to allow logged-in editing. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 10:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to a softblock, so you should be ok again. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 11:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Morning star (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

208.54.95.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Blocking administrator: Dmcdevit (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: We are not undoing the block on T-Mobile—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:George-Friedman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:George-Friedman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 22:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FromaNativeSon.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FromaNativeSon.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 18:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject:Terrorism

Greetings,

I was hoping I could get some input from you, about the proposed mergerof Wikipedia:WikiProject Terrorism and counter-terrorism with Wikiproject:Terrorism. It seems there's a lot of overlap between the two projects, and if we spent a few days merging the lists of articles, sharing ideas and collaborating on improving the same articles which both projects are focused on improving...we could really make some headway. Whether you're in favour, or against, the idea of a merger - I'd appreciate some feedback regardless. Much thanks. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 21:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kinship with All Life

Your additions have been challenged; please provide a citation where requested or remove the material in question. Thanks! Richard001 09:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikified Memetic Engineering

Good looking out on wikifying the article. I was so focused on researching I forgot to do it... Thanks --Gnosis 04:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LaVeyan Satanism

A template you created, Template:LaVeyan Satanism, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 06:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard-Wolstencroft.jpg

I have tagged Image:Richard-Wolstencroft.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 23:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Evola books

A tag has been placed on Template:Evola books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The East Came West (book)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article The East Came West (book), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evola and the Jews

Hello Morning star. In one of your edits,[1] you added this statement: Evola differed from main anti-Semitic position (that Jews are responsible for what is wrong with the world), but agreed that they had a tendency to denigrate lofty "Aryan" ideals (of faith, loyalty, courage, devotion, and constancy) through a "corrosive irony" that ascribed every human activity to economic and sexual motives (à la Marx and Freud). This needs to be sourced. — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 10:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alice Sweet Alice

An editor has nominated Alice Sweet Alice, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Sweet Alice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Terrorism Newsletter

The Terrorism WikiProject
April 2008 Newsletter

News

1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack was made a Featured Article
Omar Khadr has an ongoing peer review as it begins the slow crawl towards Featured Article status

Trials have begun this month in the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot, Benbrika affair and 2006 Toronto terrorism case, each article could use a good vetting, and the articles on specific alleged terrorists are desperately in need of some clean-up.
Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein had his case overturned by the Iraqi courts and was ordered released, although the US military says they will not release him.
China announced that they had disrupted a plot targeting the 2008 Summer Olympics, while detractors claim it was fabricated.
The bail hearing for Abdullah Khadr, fighting extradition to the United States, is scheduled for April 29
Former Turkish Member of Parliament Leyla Zana is sentenced to two years imprisonment for praising Abdullah Öcalan.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guantanamo detainees missing from the official list needs votes on whether or not it should be kept on Wikipedia.

Archives • Discussion

Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 05:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints

An article that you have been involved in editing, Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 00:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evola

In 2006 you made a big addition to the references on Julius Evola's page. You also included: Wasserstrom, Steven M. (1995), 'The Lives of Baron Evola', Alphabet City 4 + 5 (December): 84-89. I'd be interested to know if you own this essay in text or scanned form or if you otherwise have access to it? I'm looking for this for quite some time and I previously contacted the author and publisher to no avail. I'd like to use it for the German article on Evola. Thank you for your time. --149.225.88.207 (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Daniel Patrick Boyd

On August 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daniel Patrick Boyd, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biographical Dictionary of the Extreme Right Since 1890 (2nd nomination), which you contributed to. Steve Dufour (talk) 03:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Morning star! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Philip Rees - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Michael (professor)

The article George Michael (professor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Typically, assistant professors do not pass WP:PROF, and this article presents no evidence that Michael is exceptional in this regard.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Eppstein (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of George Michael (professor)

An article that you have been involved in editing, George Michael (professor), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Michael (professor). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kevin Coogan

The article Kevin Coogan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

doesn't seem notable, can't find any sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prezbo (talk) 04:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:ColinJordan.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ColinJordan.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:UniversalOrderlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:UniversalOrderlogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jmundo (talk) 05:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CosmicRetribution.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CosmicRetribution.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CosmicRetribution.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CosmicRetribution.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Islamic terrorism

Template:Islamic terrorism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Life After Death: Fact or Fiction?

The article Life After Death: Fact or Fiction? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:KilltheIndian.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KilltheIndian.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Terrorism - Welcome Back!

Welcome back from Wiki Project Terrorism! I'm Katarighe, a Wikipedian member since 2009. I'm currently the successor of Sherurcij in September because, he has not edited Wikipedia using this account for a considerable amount of time since May 2010. We are trying to renovate the new WP page this fall 2011 and we look forward this month whats next. If you are interested, start the renovation with us and new awards on contributing terrorism are coming soon. The WP terrorism newsletter begins January 2012. See you on October for the updates on WP terrorism. I will send this message next month about the updates. Good Luck.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Terrorism at 22:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antisemitism: A Reference Handbook

The article Antisemitism: A Reference Handbook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails criteria set forth in WP:NBOOK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 15:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Morning star! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Proposal - a new scope for fascism task force

I have proposed a new scope for fascism task force. Please express your opinion in the task force's talk page. Thank you!

Sapere aude22 (talk) 16:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Possibilianism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KPBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Extremist Groups: Opposing Viewpoints (2001)

The article Extremist Groups: Opposing Viewpoints (2001) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garbage and Recycling: Opposing Viewpoints

The article Garbage and Recycling: Opposing Viewpoints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:56, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Global Warming: Opposing Viewpoints (2002)

The article Global Warming: Opposing Viewpoints (2002) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:56, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hate Groups: Opposing Viewpoints (1999)

The article Hate Groups: Opposing Viewpoints (1999) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hate Groups: Opposing Viewpoints (2004)

The article Hate Groups: Opposing Viewpoints (2004) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iraq: Opposing Viewpoints

The article Iraq: Opposing Viewpoints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Islam: Opposing Viewpoints

The article Islam: Opposing Viewpoints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Israel: Opposing Viewpoints

The article Israel: Opposing Viewpoints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New World Order: Opposing Viewpoints

The article New World Order: Opposing Viewpoints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 08:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Race Relations: Opposing Viewpoints

The article Race Relations: Opposing Viewpoints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 09:00, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of War – Opposing Viewpoints

The article War – Opposing Viewpoints has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book is a collection of article reprints & fails WP:BKCRIT. The article is simply a table of contents (WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 09:00, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:StrugglefortheLand.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:StrugglefortheLand.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Annie Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Philadelphia Story

Wolf Pact (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rex Mundi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Eagle and Swastika, since you contributed to the article. Thanks. BigJim707 (talk) 03:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited How to Survive a Plague, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IFC and David Barr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Provincetown International Film Festival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Undertow and Lucy Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kevin Coogan

The article Kevin Coogan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not fulfill notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plot Spoiler (talk) 07:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Elémire Zolla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Progressive, Germanic, Orientalist, Lombard, Alsatian, University of Rome and Mystic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Age of Reason (Boardwalk Empire) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to William Forsythe and Moonlight (song)

Gimcrack & Bunkum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert White

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shakib Arslan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASSP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Garbage and Recycling: Opposing Viewpoints for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garbage and Recycling: Opposing Viewpoints is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garbage and Recycling: Opposing Viewpoints until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 22:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kids for Cash (2013 documentary), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert May (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shifting Gears (Nancy Sinatra album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaults (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmed Rami (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Military Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmed Rami (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The system (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Geydar Dzhemal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Turkic and Prophets

Ahmed Rami (writer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Berber

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Barsamian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macmillan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited That Night, A Forest Grew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hostess (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Resistance Is Futile (Dexter) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Government Agent

There's Something About Harry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Government Agent

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamptons International Film Festival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Billy Baldwin, Jamie Johnson and David Rooney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tip Top (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Informer and Algerian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Marchers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Entente and Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dead Man's Bones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Insider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jamel Debbouze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Algerian and Malian

Frazier Glenn Miller, Jr. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Armored cars

Nabil Ben Yadir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blind Spot (film)

Philippe Nahon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to C.I.D. (TV series)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amitav Acharya may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

(Politics in Asia) |publisher=Amazon.co.uk |date=2007-09-28 |accessdate=2013-06-01}}</ref> 2014)<ref>http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Periodicals/De/pdf/02_02_06.pdf</ref> || ''Constructing a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-fascist or neo-Nazi?

Hi Morning Star - I'm wondering if you might be able to give some advice? I've been reading a lot on Ukrainian far-right politics, and am not sure whether a number of groups would be classified as "neo-fascist" or "neo-Nazi."

For instance, the Social-National Assembly of Ukraine uses neo-Nazi imagery, boasts of attacks on minorities, calls for a uniracial society and holds the rights of nation, supported by a strong state, above those of the individual. One member, in an interview with the BBC, describes Hitler favorably.

On the other hand, far-right Ukrainian groups trace their origins back to Stepan Bandera and the OUN: in the 1940s these both collaborated with and also fought against the Nazis. Academic sources use both "fascist" and also "nazi" descriptions, and note that these movements glorify fascist ideals while maintaining a heritage of persecution by the Germans (among others). So, are they neo-fascist or neo-Nazi? Just curious about your thoughts. -Darouet (talk) 22:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ip Ching may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|birth_place = [[Foshan, China]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michel Chossudovsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nenad Popović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Serbia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jane Eyre 1934 DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jane Eyre 1934 DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sex-positive feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page V Magazine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julius Evola, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Burgher and Telluric. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Moynihan (journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Scorpion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (T)error, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Independent and Vogue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century

The article The Hoax of the Twentieth Century has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jeff Lowe

added a link pointing to National Geographic

Korla Pandit

added a link pointing to New Republic

List of documentary films

added a link pointing to National Geographic

Passing (racial identity)

added a link pointing to New Republic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wild and Woolly (1932 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canine and Cabin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexander Prokhanov

added links pointing to Apocalyptic, Surreal and Godfather

Albert Makashov

added a link pointing to Cordons

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Léon de Poncins, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain, British and Saint-Denis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques Bordiot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb

Hello,

I saw you cited IMDb as a reference here on Rupert Evans, and again here on Canaris. I've removed these references because IMDb isn't a reliable source as anyone can edit it, just like Wikipedia. See https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Resources#Questionable_resources for more info. Basically, sourcing IMDb is discouraged, and instead IMDb entries should only be external links. Downwiththesyndrome (talk) 08:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Datuk Seri Najib Razak listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Datuk Seri Najib Razak. Since you had some involvement with the Datuk Seri Najib Razak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 04:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename category

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Islamic Relief organizations to Category:Islamic relief organizations Hugo999 (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johnny Lingo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bargain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harold Arthur McNeill

The article Harold Arthur McNeill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Morning star. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Craig Harline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LDS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BrotherhoodofSatanposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BrotherhoodofSatanposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Morning star. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Footer Releases LJDLP

Template:Footer Releases LJDLP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 00:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miscellanea (Guénon book)

The article Miscellanea (Guénon book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for books or the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:30, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Morning star. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Extremism in America: A Reader

The article Extremism in America: A Reader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warren Jeffs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for new WikiProject

I see you were a member of the (now defunct) WikiProject Wikipedia: WikiProject Germanic Mysticism. I wonder whether you would be interested in starting a WikiProject Mysticism which I am trying to start at Wikipedia: WikiProject Council? Vorbee (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Dear User: Morning star, it appears that Wikipedia: WikiProject Mysticism has now been started, so you may like to join. It has been suggested at Wikipedia: WikiProject Council that Wikipedia: WikiProject Germanic Mysticism could be merged with the newer WikiProject. Vorbee (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prison Dogs

The article Prison Dogs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary. No independent verifiable reviews found in a WP:BEFORE. All citations are from non-reliable sources (youtube, facebook, IMdB, etc.) Nothing better found. Tagged since 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The East Came West

The article The East Came West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambig page feeding two non-existent articles. Both books are likely to fail WP:GNG in any case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Brigade Piron (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Socialism: Vanguard of the Future

The article National Socialism: Vanguard of the Future has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Unsourced since 2005. No content which could obviously benefit other articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Brigade Piron (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rants and Incendiary Tracts

The article Rants and Incendiary Tracts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Unsourced since its creation in 2005. No indication of notability found in Google Books search, and unlikely to be notable merely as an anthology of other texts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Brigade Piron (talk) 10:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Fascism 1918–39

The article British Fascism 1918–39 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Unsourced since 2005. It appears only to have been produced in one edition and not to have had a notable impact on the scholarly literature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Russian Fascism: Traditions, Tendencies, Movements for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian Fascism: Traditions, Tendencies, Movements is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian Fascism: Traditions, Tendencies, Movements (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nyack, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mill Brook.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Opposing Viewpoints series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opposing Viewpoints series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposing Viewpoints series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Doug Weller talk 13:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings I hope. You created these a long time ago and Wikipedia has changed a lot since then! Doug Weller talk 13:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, no worries. Thanks for the 'heads up'.—Morning star (talk) 16:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paris (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kill the Messenger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Podhorzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data-driven.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Sally Grossman

On 18 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sally Grossman, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of slavery in Utah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extermination order.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antigovernment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open Head Surgery

The article Open Head Surgery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable album without sufficient references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 139.6 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Terrorism: Opposing Viewpoints (2004 book)

The article Terrorism: Opposing Viewpoints (2004 book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BOOKCRIT by any criterion. In a WP:BEFORE I could find no evidence of reviews or coverage. It's published by an educational publisher; for WP:TEXTBOOKS, I couldn't find any evidence it was a standard text, editor is not notable, a few citations in Google Scholar that may or may not be good evidence. Very old article (2006) that doesn't seem to be up to current standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Impeachment of Man

The article The Impeachment of Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for five years, no sources forthcoming.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Human trafficking in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human trafficking in popular culture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human trafficking in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Nazism in relation to other concepts" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Nazism in relation to other concepts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 31 § Nazism in relation to other concepts until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Völkisch Ideology and the Roots of Nazism

The article The Völkisch Ideology and the Roots of Nazism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notabilty questionable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]